IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prochp/978-3-642-39747-9_32.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Rethinking Social CRM Design: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective

In: Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management

Author

Listed:
  • Hong-Mei Chen

    (Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa)

  • Stephen L. Vargo

    (Shidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at Manoa)

Abstract

The rapid rise of powerful social customers has drastically changed the e-business landscape. Social CRM (SCRM) emerged in late 2009 as an e-business strategy for companies to enable customer relationship management (with social customers) utilizing social technology. Despite the many applications that are labeled as SCRM, there is a dearth of guidelines for SCRM design and development. Many companies are trapped using social media as just another communication channel, and have naively applied traditional Electronic CRM (ECRM) practices on social platforms based on a model of exchange that centers on goods (e.g., goods-dominant logic or G-D logic), with value created by the firm and relationship implying multiple transactions of value-laden output. G-D logic might have served companies in the pre-Web 2.0 environment in which the interaction with customers could be contained in one-to-one, closed, well-defined channels. However, in a collaborative open, social environment in which interactions cannot be contained and are often unpredictable, this firm-centric, transaction-oriented approach is at odds with how social customers behave and expect, and therefore becomes inadequate in fostering true relationships that cultivate devoted advocates and brand co-creators. In this chapter, we offer an alternative logic called service-dominant (S-D) logic for SCRM design to meet new challenges. S-D logic is based on the reciprocal application of applied competences (service), which sees relationship in terms of co-creation of value. We argue that the S-D logic perspective for SCRM is appropriate, if not essential. We offer S-D logic-informed strategies for SCRM and next-generation CRM system design.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong-Mei Chen & Stephen L. Vargo, 2014. "Rethinking Social CRM Design: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective," Progress in IS, in: Francisco J. Martínez-López (ed.), Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management, edition 127, pages 767-784, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-642-39747-9_32
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39747-9_32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nha Nguyen & Gaston LeBlanc, 2021. "The Impact of Service Employees and Servicescape on Customers’ Perception of Quality Improvement Efforts," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 7(2), pages 123-144, April.
    2. Mohammad Hasan Galib & Khalid Ait Hammou & Jennifer Steiger, 2018. "Predicting Consumer Behavior: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-73, August.
    3. Norberto Muñiz-Martinez & Magdalena Florek, 2023. "Food-based place branding as holistic place ecosystems: the case of Basque Gastronomic Ecosystem," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 155-166, March.
    4. Mahmood Al-Bashayreh & Dmaithan Almajali & Manaf Al-Okaily & Ra’ed Masa’deh & Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, 2022. "Evaluating Electronic Customer Relationship Management System Success: The Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-642-39747-9_32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.