IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pkk/meb014/41-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Modest and Fragile Signs of SMEs Recovery in Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Miroljub Hadžiæ

    (Singidunum University)

  • Petar Pavloviæ

    (Ministry of Regional Development and Local Self-Government of the Republic of Serbia)

Abstract

The world economic crisis stopped fast development of SMEs in Serbia and those economic subjects are still suffering. It seems that there are positive signs from 2012, as after few years of downturn business demography of companies is improving and became positive. Considering competitive level very positive signal is fast increasing export, especially high tech products and relatively good position in ICT use. At the same time less optimist position is regarding investments and costs competitiveness, which point importance of governmental support and financial support from banks. Entrepreneurs are aware that the crisis is of long lasting sort. They are ready to fight and ask government to dismantle obstacles and to improve overall business environment. The aim of the paper is twofold: firstly, to examine the current situation, problems and limitations to SME development, and, secondly, to propose an adequate support policy mix.

Suggested Citation

  • Miroljub Hadžiæ & Petar Pavloviæ, 2014. "Modest and Fragile Signs of SMEs Recovery in Serbia," Proceedings- 11th International Conference on Mangement, Enterprise and Benchmarking (MEB 2014),, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkk:meb014:41-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/sites/default/files/02_Hadzic%20Pavlovic.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finger, J M & Kreinin, M E, 1979. "A Measure of 'Export Similarity' and Its Possible Uses," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(356), pages 905-912, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doukoure Charle Fe, 2021. "Trade flows between the West African Economic and Monetary Union's members so little: does exports structure matter ?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(2), pages 816-833.
    2. Noland, Marcus, 1997. "Has Asian export performance been unique?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1-2), pages 79-101, August.
    3. Kuroiwa, Ikuo, 2014. "Value added trade and structure of high-technology exports in China," IDE Discussion Papers 449, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    4. Zelal Kotan & Serdar Sayan, 2001. "A Comparison Of The Price Competitiveness Of Turkish And South East Asian Exports In The European Union Market In The 1990s," Discussion Papers 0102, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    5. Bahar, Dany & Hausmann, Ricardo & Hidalgo, Cesar A., 2014. "Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 111-123.
    6. Evžen Kočenda & Karen Poghosyan, 2018. "Export Sophistication: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 2799-2814, September.
    7. Wani, Nassir Ul Haq, 2019. "Latency and Economic Concert of India’s Trade with Russia: An Empirical Investigation," MPRA Paper 104616, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Nov 2020.
    8. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Riesgo, Laura, 2016. "Modeling at farm level: Positive Multi-Attribute Utility Programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 17-27.
    9. Fock, Achim & von Ledebur, Oliver, 1998. "Struktur und Potentiale des Agraraußenhandels Mittel- und Osteuropas," IAMO Discussion Papers 14, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. Jerome Trotignon, 2005. "EMU Enlargement to Include CEE Countries: Risks of Sector-based and Geographical Asymmetric Shocks," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 3-21.
    11. repec:kap:iaecre:v:16:y:2010:i:1:p:11-23 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Rozakis, Stelios, 2011. "Impacts of flatter rates and environmental top-ups in Greece: A novel mathematical modeling approach," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(2).
    13. Hylke VANDENBUSSCHE & Francesco DI COMITE & Laura ROVEGNO & Christian VIEGELAHN, 2011. "Moving up the Quality ladder? EU-China Trade Dynamics in Clothing," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2011047, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    14. Diwan, Ishac & Hoekman, Bernard, 1999. "Competition, Complementarity and Contagion in East Asia," CEPR Discussion Papers 2112, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Atsuyuki Kato, 2022. "Trade Competition Between ASEAN, China, and India: The Post-trade War and COVID-19 Scenario," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 14(2), pages 163-184, May.
    16. Gheorghe Săvoiu & Vasile Dinu & Laurenţiu Tăchiciu, 2012. "Romania Foreign Trade in Global Recession, Revealed by the Extended Method of Exchange Rate Indicators," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(31), pages 173-194, February.
    17. Elsner, Karin & Hartmann, Monika, 1998. "Convergence Of Food Consumption Patterns Between Eastern And Western Europe," IAMO Discussion Papers 14875, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    18. Ari Van Assche & Byron Gangnes, 2010. "Electronics production upgrading: is China exceptional?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 477-482.
    19. Baliamoune-Lutz, Mina, 2019. "Trade sophistication in developing countries: Does export destination matter?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 39-51.
    20. Prema-chandra Athukorala & Tala Talgaswatta & Omer Majeed, 2017. "Global production sharing: Exploring Australia's competitive edge," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(10), pages 2172-2192, October.
    21. Mark Thissen & Frank van Oort & Philip McCann & Raquel Ortega-Argilés & Trond Husby, 2020. "The Implications of Brexit for UK and EU Regional Competitiveness," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 96(5), pages 397-421, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkk:meb014:41-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexandra Vécsey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gkbmfhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.