IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pca704.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Evan Michael Calford

Personal Details

First Name:Evan
Middle Name:Michael
Last Name:Calford
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pca704
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/site/evancalford/
Terminal Degree:2016 Vancouver School of Economics; University of British Columbia (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Research School of Economics
College of Business and Economics
Australian National University

Canberra, Australia
https://rse.anu.edu.au/
RePEc:edi:eganuau (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Evan Calford, 2024. "Supernudge: A transparent pricing proposal for sports betting," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2024-700, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
  2. Evan M. Calford & Anujit Charkraborty, 2022. "The Value of and Demand for Diverse News Sources," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2022-688, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
  3. Evan M. Calford & Anujit Chakraborty, 2022. "Higher-order Beliefs in a Sequential Social Dilemma," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2022-681, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
  4. Evan M. Calford & Timothy N. Cason, 2021. "Contingent Reasoning and Dynamic Public Goods Provision," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2021-679, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
  5. Evan M. Calford & Gregory DeAngelo, 2020. "Ambiguity & Enforcement," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1322, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
  6. Evan M. Calford, 2020. "Mixed strategies and preference for randomization in games with ambiguity averse agents," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2020-675, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
  7. Evan M. Calford & Anujit Chakraborty, 2020. "The Network Dilemma," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1323, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
  8. Evan Calford, 2017. "Uncertainty Aversion in Game Theory: Experimental Evidence," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1291, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
  9. Calford, Evan, 2016. "Mixed Strategies in Games with Ambiguity Averse Agents," MPRA Paper 74909, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  10. Calford, Evan & Chakraborty, Anujit & Fenig, Guidon & Halevy, Yoram, 2014. "External and Internal Consistency of Choices made in Convex Time Budgets," Microeconomics.ca working papers yoram_halevy-2014-37, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 09 Jan 2017.
  11. Calford, Evan M. & Heinzel, Christoph & Betz, Regina, 2010. "Initial Allocation Effects in Permit Markets with Bertrand Output Oligopoly," Research Reports 95066, Australian National University, Environmental Economics Research Hub.

Articles

  1. Calford, Evan M. & Chakraborty, Anujit, 2025. "Higher-order beliefs in a sequential social dilemma," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
  2. Evan M. Calford & Timothy N. Cason, 2024. "Contingent Reasoning and Dynamic Public Goods Provision," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 236-266, May.
  3. Evan M. Calford & Gregory DeAngelo, 2023. "Ambiguity and enforcement," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(2), pages 304-338, April.
  4. Calford, Evan M., 2021. "Mixed strategies and preference for randomization in games with ambiguity averse agents," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  5. Calford, Evan M., 2020. "Uncertainty aversion in game theory: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 720-734.
  6. Evan Calford & Ryan Oprea, 2017. "Continuity, Inertia, and Strategic Uncertainty: A Test of the Theory of Continuous Time Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 915-935, May.
  7. Anujit Chakraborty & Evan M. Calford & Guidon Fenig & Yoram Halevy, 2017. "External and internal consistency of choices made in convex time budgets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(3), pages 687-706, September.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Evan Calford & Christoph Heinzel & Regina Betz, 2010. "Initial Allocation Effects in Permit Markets with Bertrand Output Oligopoly," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1059, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    Mentioned in:

    1. EERH Research Reports: June 2010
      by David Stern in Stochastic Trend on 2010-07-03 15:06:00

Working papers

  1. Evan M. Calford & Timothy N. Cason, 2021. "Contingent Reasoning and Dynamic Public Goods Provision," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2021-679, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Esponda, Ignacio & Vespa, Emanuel, 2023. "Contingent Thinking and the Sure-Thing Principle: Revisiting Classic Anomalies in the Laboratory#," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt32j4d5z2, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
    2. Niederle, Muriel & Vespa, Emanuel, 2023. "Cognitive Limitations: Failures of Contingent Thinking," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt5q14p1np, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.

  2. Evan M. Calford & Gregory DeAngelo, 2020. "Ambiguity & Enforcement," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1322, Purdue University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Marina Agranov & Anastasia Buyalskaya, 2022. "Deterrence Effects of Enforcement Schemes: An Experimental Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(5), pages 3573-3589, May.

  3. Evan M. Calford, 2020. "Mixed strategies and preference for randomization in games with ambiguity averse agents," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2020-675, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Pablo Bra~nas-Garza & Antonio Cabrales & Mar'ia Paz Espinosa & Diego Jorrat, 2022. "The effect of ambiguity in strategic environments: an experiment," Papers 2209.11079, arXiv.org.
    2. Evan Calford, 2017. "Uncertainty Aversion in Game Theory: Experimental Evidence," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1291, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    3. Fabian Bopp & Sara le Roux, 2023. "Social learning under ambiguity - an experimental study," Working Papers Dissertations 110, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.

  4. Evan M. Calford & Anujit Chakraborty, 2020. "The Network Dilemma," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1323, Purdue University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Evan M. Calford & Anujit Chakraborty, 2022. "Higher-order Beliefs in a Sequential Social Dilemma," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2022-681, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.

  5. Evan Calford, 2017. "Uncertainty Aversion in Game Theory: Experimental Evidence," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1291, Purdue University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Yiting Chen & Songfa Zhong, 2024. "Source Dependence in Effort Provision," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 65(3), pages 1499-1517, August.
    2. Lisa Bruttel & Muhammed Bulutay & Camille Cornand & Frank Heinemann & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2022. "Measuring strategic-uncertainty attitudes," CEPA Discussion Papers 54, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    3. Calford, Evan, 2016. "Mixed Strategies in Games with Ambiguity Averse Agents," MPRA Paper 74909, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Cédric Gutierrez & Emmanuel Kemel, 2024. "Measuring natural source dependence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(2), pages 379-416, April.
    5. Calford, Evan M., 2021. "Mixed strategies and preference for randomization in games with ambiguity averse agents," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Cathleen Johnson & Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Zhihua Li & Dennie Dolder & Peter P. Wakker, 2021. "Prince: An improved method for measuring incentivized preferences," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Li, Chen & Turmunkh, Uyanga & Wakker, Peter P., 2020. "Social and strategic ambiguity versus betrayal aversion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 272-287.
    8. Li, Jiangyan & Fairley, Kim & Fenneman, Achiel, 2024. "Does it matter how we produce ambiguity in experiments?," MPRA Paper 122336, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Matteo M. Marini & Aurora García-Gallego & Luca Corazzini, 2018. "Communication in a threshold public goods game with ambiguity: Anomalies and regularities," Working Papers 2018/03, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    10. David Kelsey & Sara le Roux, 2018. "Strategic ambiguity and decision-making: an experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(3), pages 387-404, May.
    11. Evan M. Calford & Gregory DeAngelo, 2023. "Ambiguity and enforcement," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(2), pages 304-338, April.
    12. Johannes Carow & Niklas M. Witzig, 2024. "Time Pressure and Strategic Risk-Taking in Professional Chess," Working Papers 2404, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    13. Caetano, Rafaela Vital & Marques, António Cardoso, 2023. "Could energy transition be a game changer for the transfer of polluting industries from developed to developing countries? An application of game theory," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 351-363.
    14. Andrea Morone & Paola Tiranzoni, 2020. "Bargaining in a "Pawn Shop": A field experiment to study WTA," Framed Field Experiments 00702, The Field Experiments Website.

  6. Calford, Evan, 2016. "Mixed Strategies in Games with Ambiguity Averse Agents," MPRA Paper 74909, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Evan Calford, 2017. "Uncertainty Aversion in Game Theory: Experimental Evidence," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1291, Purdue University, Department of Economics.

  7. Calford, Evan & Chakraborty, Anujit & Fenig, Guidon & Halevy, Yoram, 2014. "External and Internal Consistency of Choices made in Convex Time Budgets," Microeconomics.ca working papers yoram_halevy-2014-37, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 09 Jan 2017.

    Cited by:

    1. Drouhin, Nicolas, 2020. "Non-stationary additive utility and time consistency," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Balbus, Łukasz & Reffett, Kevin & Woźny, Łukasz, 2022. "Time-consistent equilibria in dynamic models with recursive payoffs and behavioral discounting," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Cheung, Stephen L. & Tymula, Agnieszka & Wang, Xueting, 2020. "Present Bias for Monetary and Dietary Rewards: Evidence from Chinese Teenagers," IZA Discussion Papers 13406, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    5. Kuroishi, Yusuke & Sawada, Yasuyuki, 2024. "On the stability of preferences: Experimental evidence from two disasters," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Diego Aycinena & Szabolcs Blazsek & Lucas Rentschler & Charles Sprenger, 2020. "Intertemporal Choice Experiments and Large-Stakes Behavior," Working Papers 20-36, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
    7. Meyer, Andrew G., 2015. "The impacts of elicitation mechanism and reward size on estimated rates of time preference," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 132-148.
    8. Lanier, Joshua & Miao, Bin & Quah, John & Zhong, Songfa, 2018. "Intertemporal Consumption with Risk: A Revealed Preference Analysis," MPRA Paper 86263, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Chopra, Felix & Eisenhauer, Philipp & Falk, Armin & Graeber, Thomas W, 2021. "Intertemporal Altruism," IZA Discussion Papers 14059, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Wendy Janssens & Berber Kramer & Lisette Swart, 2015. "Be patient when measuring Hyperbolic Discounting: Stationarity, Time Consistency and Time Invariance in a Field Experiment," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-097/V, Tinbergen Institute, revised 14 Apr 2016.
    11. Benjamin Enke & Thomas Graeber & Ryan Oprea, 2023. "Complexity and Hyperbolic Discounting," NBER Working Papers 31047, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Gabaix, Xavier & Laibson, David, 2017. "Myopia and Discounting," CEPR Discussion Papers 11914, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Uttara Balakrishnan & Johannes Haushofer & Pamela Jakiela, 2020. "How soon is now? Evidence of present bias from convex time budget experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(2), pages 294-321, June.
    14. Therese C. Grijalva & Jayson L. Lusk & Rong Rong & W. Douglass Shaw, 2018. "Convex Time Budgets and Individual Discount Rates in the Long Run," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 259-277, September.
    15. Chen Sun & Jan Potters, 2022. "Magnitude effect in intertemporal allocation tasks," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 593-623, April.
    16. Rong, Rong & Gnagey, Matthew & Grijalva, Therese, 2018. "“The less you Discount, the more it shows you really care”: Interpersonal discounting in households," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-23.
    17. Abdellaoui, Mohammed & Kemel, Emmanuel & Panin, Amma & Vieider, Ferdinand M., 2024. "Time for tea: Measuring discounting for money and consumption without the utility confound," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    18. Rong Rong & Therese C. Grijalva & Jayson Lusk & W. Douglass Shaw, 2019. "Interpersonal discounting," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 17-42, February.
    19. Claudia Cerrone & Anujit Chakraborty & Hyok Jung Kim & Leonhard Lades, 2023. "Estimating Present Bias and Sophistication over Effort and Money," Working Papers 359, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    20. Felix Koelle & Lukas Wenner, 2018. "Present-Biased Generosity: Time Inconsistency across Individual and Social Contexts," Discussion Papers 2018-02, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    21. Benjamin Enke & Thomas Graeber & Ryan Oprea, 2023. "Complexity and Time," CESifo Working Paper Series 10327, CESifo.
    22. Kölle, Felix & Wenner, Lukas, 2019. "Time-Inconsistent Generosity: Present Bias across Individual and Social Contexts," VfS Annual Conference 2019 (Leipzig): 30 Years after the Fall of the Berlin Wall - Democracy and Market Economy 203505, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    23. Matthew Gnagey & Therese Grijalva & Rong Rong, 2020. "Spousal influence and assortative mating on time preferences: a field experiment in the USA," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 461-512, June.

Articles

  1. Evan M. Calford & Timothy N. Cason, 2024. "Contingent Reasoning and Dynamic Public Goods Provision," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 236-266, May.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Evan M. Calford & Gregory DeAngelo, 2023. "Ambiguity and enforcement," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(2), pages 304-338, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Li, Jiangyan & Fairley, Kim & Fenneman, Achiel, 2024. "Does it matter how we produce ambiguity in experiments?," MPRA Paper 122336, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Syed Asad Abbas Bokhari, 2023. "A Quantitative Study on the Factors Influencing Implementation of Cybersecurity Laws and Regulations in Pakistan," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, November.

  3. Calford, Evan M., 2021. "Mixed strategies and preference for randomization in games with ambiguity averse agents," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Calford, Evan M., 2020. "Uncertainty aversion in game theory: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 720-734.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Evan Calford & Ryan Oprea, 2017. "Continuity, Inertia, and Strategic Uncertainty: A Test of the Theory of Continuous Time Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 915-935, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Iriberri, Nagore & Kovarik, Jaromir & Garcia-Pola, Bernardo, 2016. "Non-equilibrium Play in Centipede Games," CEPR Discussion Papers 11477, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Zhao, Shuchen, 2021. "Taking turns in continuous time," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 257-279.
    3. Suetens, Sigrid & Ghidoni, Riccardo, 2019. "Empirical evidence on repeated sequential games," CEPR Discussion Papers 13809, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Dal Bó, Pedro & Fréchette, Guillaume R. & Kim, Jeongbin, 2021. "The determinants of efficient behavior in coordination games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 352-368.
    5. Anmina Murielle Djiguemde & Dimitri Dubois & Alexandre Sauquet & Mabel Tidball, 2021. "Continuous versus Discrete Time in Dynamic Common Pool Resource Game Experiments," Working Papers hal-03214973, HAL.
    6. Bosch-Rosa, Ciril, 2014. "That's how we roll: An experiment on rollover risk," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2014-048, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    7. Choi, S. & Goyal, S. & Moisan, F., 2020. "Brokerage Rents and Intermediation Networks," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2005, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    8. Matthew Embrey & Guillaume R. Frechette & Sevgi Yuksel, 2016. "Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma," Working Paper Series 08616, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    9. Marco Castillo & Ahrash Dianat, 2021. "Strategic uncertainty and equilibrium selection in stable matching mechanisms: experimental evidence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(4), pages 1365-1389, December.
    10. Johannes Hoelzemann & Nicolas Klein, 2021. "Bandits in the lab," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 1021-1051, July.
    11. Choi, S & Goyal, S. & Moisan, F., 2019. "Connectors and Influencers," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1935, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    12. Choi, S. & Goyal, G. & Moisan, F., 2020. "Large Scale Experiments on Networks: A New Platform with Applications," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2063, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    13. Choi, S. & Goyal, S. & Guo, F. & Moisan, F., 2024. "Experimental Evidence on Group Size Effects in Network Formation Games," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2417, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    14. Anujit Chakraborty, 2022. "Motives Behind Cooperation in Finitely Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma," Working Papers 353, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    15. van Leeuwen, Boris & Offerman, Theo & van de Ven, Jeroen, 2018. "Fight or Flight : Endogenous Timing in Conflicts," Discussion Paper 2018-052, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    16. Benndorf, Volker & Martínez-Martínez, Ismael & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2021. "Games with coupled populations: An experiment in continuous time," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Stanton Hudja & Daniel Woods, 2024. "Exploration versus exploitation: A laboratory test of the single‐agent exponential bandit model," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(1), pages 267-286, January.
    18. Xue, Lian & Sitzia, Stefania & Turocy, Theodore L., 2023. "Concord and contention in a dynamic unstructured bargaining experiment with costly conflict," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Timothy N. Cason & Daniel Friedman & Ed Hopkins, 2020. "An Experimental Investigation of Price Dispersion and Cycles," Purdue University Economics Working Papers 1324, Purdue University, Department of Economics.
    20. Chakraborty, Anujit, 2023. "Motives behind cooperation in finitely repeated prisoner's dilemma," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 105-132.
    21. He, Simin & Zhu, Xun, 2023. "Real-time monitoring in a public-goods game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 454-479.

  6. Anujit Chakraborty & Evan M. Calford & Guidon Fenig & Yoram Halevy, 2017. "External and internal consistency of choices made in convex time budgets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(3), pages 687-706, September.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 14 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (10) 2014-08-28 2016-11-13 2017-07-16 2020-08-31 2021-11-22 2022-01-31 2022-06-27 2023-04-10 2023-04-10 2024-01-01. Author is listed
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (8) 2016-11-13 2017-07-16 2020-04-13 2020-08-31 2021-11-22 2022-01-31 2023-04-10 2024-01-01. Author is listed
  3. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (4) 2014-08-28 2016-11-13 2021-11-22 2024-01-01
  4. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (4) 2010-06-26 2010-11-13 2016-11-13 2020-08-31
  5. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (4) 2014-08-28 2016-11-13 2017-07-16 2020-08-31
  6. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (3) 2010-06-26 2010-11-13 2024-07-15
  7. NEP-ENE: Energy Economics (2) 2010-06-26 2010-11-13
  8. NEP-ENV: Environmental Economics (2) 2010-06-26 2010-11-13
  9. NEP-IND: Industrial Organization (2) 2010-06-26 2010-11-13
  10. NEP-REG: Regulation (2) 2010-06-26 2024-07-15
  11. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2010-06-26
  12. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (1) 2021-11-22
  13. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (1) 2014-08-28
  14. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (1) 2016-11-13
  15. NEP-SPO: Sports and Economics (1) 2024-07-15

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Evan Michael Calford should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.