IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pth192.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Tim Paul Thomes

Personal Details

First Name:Tim
Middle Name:Paul
Last Name:Thomes
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pth192
http://www.whu.edu/forschung/fakultaet/economics-group/mikrooekonomik-und-industrieoekonomik-ii/team/

Affiliation

Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE)
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät
Heinriche-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, Germany
http://www.dice.uni-duesseldorf.de/
RePEc:edi:diduede (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Reisinger, Markus & Thomes, Tim Paul, 2017. "Manufacturer collusion: Strategic implications of the channel structure," DICE Discussion Papers 261, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
  2. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2011. "An economic analysis of online streaming. How the music industry can generate revenues from cloud computing," ZEW Discussion Papers 11-039, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

Articles

  1. Markus Reisinger & Tim Paul Thomes, 2017. "Manufacturer collusion: Strategic implications of the channel structure," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 923-954, December.
  2. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2015. "In-house publishing and competition in the video game industry," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 46-57.
  3. Reisinger, Markus & Ressner, Ludwig & Schmidtke, Richard & Thomes, Tim Paul, 2014. "Crowding-in of complementary contributions to public goods: Firm investment into open source software," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 78-94.
  4. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2013. "An economic analysis of online streaming music services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 81-91.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Reisinger, Markus & Thomes, Tim Paul, 2017. "Manufacturer collusion: Strategic implications of the channel structure," DICE Discussion Papers 261, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

    Cited by:

    1. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan & Liu, Yunchuan, 2020. "Single vs. cross distribution channels with manufacturers’ dynamic tacit collusion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Subrata Saha & Zbigniew Banaszak & Grzegorz Bocewicz & Izabela Ewa Nielsen, 2022. "Pricing and quality competition for substitutable green products with a common retailer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3713-3746, September.
    3. Schlütter, Frank, 2022. "Managing Seller Conduct in Online Marketplaces and Platform Most-Favored Nation Clauses," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2022026, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Leonard F. S. Wang & Han Wang, 2021. "Will managerial delegation impede upstream collusion?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 127-146, October.

  2. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2011. "An economic analysis of online streaming. How the music industry can generate revenues from cloud computing," ZEW Discussion Papers 11-039, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Felix Schwemer, 2014. "The licensing of online music streaming services in Europe," Chapters, in: Richard Watt (ed.), Handbook on the Economics of Copyright, chapter 9, pages 141-164, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Godefroy Nguyen & Sylvain Dejean & François Moreau, 2014. "On the complementarity between online and offline music consumption: the case of free streaming," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 38(4), pages 315-330, November.
    3. Godefroy Dang Nguyen & Sylvain Dejean & François Moreau, 2014. "On the Complementarity between Online and Offline Music Consumption: The Case of Free Streaming," Post-Print hal-01344836, HAL.

Articles

  1. Markus Reisinger & Tim Paul Thomes, 2017. "Manufacturer collusion: Strategic implications of the channel structure," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 923-954, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2015. "In-house publishing and competition in the video game industry," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 46-57.

    Cited by:

    1. Cenamor, Javier & Frishammar, Johan, 2021. "Openness in platform ecosystems: Innovation strategies for complementary products," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    2. Xi, Xun & Xi, Baoxing & Miao, Chenglin & Yu, Rongjian & Xie, Jie & Xiang, Rong & Hu, Feng, 2022. "Factors influencing technological innovation efficiency in the Chinese video game industry: Applying the meta-frontier approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Qiang Li & Qing Liu & Xiaona Guo & Shuo Xu & Jingyu Liu & Heli Lu, 2019. "Evolution and Transformation of the Central Place Theory in E-Business: China’s C2C Online Game Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Shekhar, Shiva, 2017. "Homing choice and platform pricing strategy," DICE Discussion Papers 247, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

  3. Reisinger, Markus & Ressner, Ludwig & Schmidtke, Richard & Thomes, Tim Paul, 2014. "Crowding-in of complementary contributions to public goods: Firm investment into open source software," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 78-94.

    Cited by:

    1. Gastón Llanes, 2019. "Competitive strategy for open and user innovation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 280-297, April.
    2. Knut Blind & Torben Schubert, 2024. "Estimating the GDP effect of Open Source Software and its complementarities with R&D and patents: evidence and policy implications," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 466-491, April.
    3. Menéndez-Caravaca, Eloísa & Bueno, Salvador & Gallego, M. Dolores, 2021. "Exploring the link between free and open source software and the collaborative economy: A Delphi-based scenario for the year 2025," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. David Worden & Getu Hailu & Kate Jones & Yu Na Lee, 2022. "The effects of bundling on livestock producers' valuations of environmentally friendly traits available through genomic selection," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(4), pages 263-286, December.

  4. Thomes, Tim Paul, 2013. "An economic analysis of online streaming music services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 81-91.

    Cited by:

    1. Luis Aguiar & Jörg Claussen & Christian Peukert, 2018. "Catch Me If You Can: Effectiveness and Consequences of Online Copyright Enforcement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 656-678, September.
    2. Gambato, Jacopo & Sandrini, Luca, 2024. "Not as good as it used to be: Do streaming platforms penalize quality?," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-045, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    3. Stephen Bazen & Laurence Bouvard & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2015. "Musicians and the Creative Commons: A survey of artists on Jamendo," Post-Print hal-01457307, HAL.
    4. Youming Liu, 2023. "Competition for Exclusivity and Customer Lock-in: Evidence from Copyright Enforcement in China," Staff Working Papers 23-43, Bank of Canada.
    5. Ramadan Aly-Tovar & Maya Bacache-Beauvallet & Marc Bourreau & Francois Moreau, 2020. "Why would artists favor free streaming?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(2), pages 255-280, June.
    6. Sim, Jaeung & Park, Jea Gon & Cho, Daegon & Smith, Michael D. & Jung, Jaemin, 2022. "Bestseller lists and product discovery in the subscription-based market: Evidence from music streaming," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 550-567.
    7. Marc Bourreau & Germain Gaudin, 2018. "Streaming Platform and Strategic Recommendation Bias," CESifo Working Paper Series 7390, CESifo.
    8. Pongnumkul, Suchit & Motohashi, Kazuyuki, 2018. "A bipartite fitness model for online music streaming services," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1125-1137.
    9. Gambato, Jacopo & Sandrini, Luca, 2023. "Not as good as it used to be: Do streaming platforms penalize quality?," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-032, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Casidy, Riza & Phau, Ian & Lwin, Michael, 2016. "The role of religious leaders on digital piracy attitude and intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 244-252.
    11. E. Carroni & D. Paolini, 2020. "Business models for streaming platforms: content acquisition, advertising and users," Working Paper CRENoS 202001, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    12. Kretschmer, Tobias & Peukert, Christian, 2019. "Video Killed the Radio Star? Online Music Videos and Recorded Music Sales," CEPR Discussion Papers 14038, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Kim, Jiwhan & Nam, Changi & Ryu, Min Ho, 2017. "What do consumers prefer for music streaming services?: A comparative study between Korea and US," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 263-272.
    14. Christian Peukert, 2019. "The next wave of digital technological change and the cultural industries," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 43(2), pages 189-210, June.
    15. Hiller R. Scott & Walter Jason M., 2017. "The Rise of Streaming Music and Implications for Music Production," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(4), pages 351-385, December.
    16. Daniel Kaimann & Ilka Tanneberg & Joe Cox, 2021. "“I will survive”: Online streaming and the chart survival of music tracks," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 3-20, January.
    17. Zennyo, Yusuke, 2020. "Freemium competition among ad-sponsored platforms," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 2 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (2) 2011-09-16 2017-07-30
  2. NEP-MKT: Marketing (2) 2011-09-16 2017-07-30
  3. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory and Applications (1) 2017-07-30
  4. NEP-CUL: Cultural Economics (1) 2011-09-16
  5. NEP-ICT: Information and Communication Technologies (1) 2011-09-16
  6. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2017-07-30
  7. NEP-NET: Network Economics (1) 2011-09-16

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Tim Paul Thomes should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.