IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/ppu134.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Briony D. Pulford

Personal Details

First Name:Briony
Middle Name:D.
Last Name:Pulford
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ppu134
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/view/briony-pulford/homepage
Twitter: @brionypulford

Affiliation

University of Leicester, Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour

https://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/npb
UK, Leicester

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Despoina Alempaki & Andrew M Colman & Felix Koelle & Graham Loomes & Briony D Pulford, 2019. "Investigating the failure to best respond in experimental games," Discussion Papers 2019-13, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
  2. Gold, Natalie & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2015. "Do as I say, don't do as I do: differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109257, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  3. Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2007. "Ambiguous games: Evidence for strategic ambiguity aversion," MPRA Paper 86345, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Articles

  1. Andrew M. Colman & Briony D. Pulford & Alexander Crombie, 2024. "Persistence or decay of strategic asymmetric dominance in repeated dyadic games?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(4), pages 766-786, September.
  2. Maryam Bathaei Javareshk & Briony D. Pulford & Eva M. Krockow, 2024. "Mental accounting in tax liabilities," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 51(2), pages 153-164, June.
  3. Despoina Alempaki & Andrew M. Colman & Felix Kölle & Graham Loomes & Briony D. Pulford, 2022. "Investigating the failure to best respond in experimental games," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 656-679, April.
  4. Soraya Boam & Briony D. Pulford, 2019. "Experiencing risk: the effect of the experiential life-skills centre ‘Warning Zone’ on children’s risk perception," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 177-190, February.
  5. Krockow, Eva M. & Takezawa, Masanori & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M. & Smithers, Samuel & Kita, Toshimasa & Nakawake, Yo, 2018. "Commitment-enhancing tools in Centipede games: Evidencing European–Japanese differences in trust and cooperation," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 61-72, January.
  6. Briony D. Pulford & Andrew M. Colman & Graham Loomes, 2018. "Incentive Magnitude Effects in Experimental Games: Bigger is not Necessarily Better," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
  7. Krockow, Eva M. & Takezawa, Masanori & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M. & Smithers, Samuel & Kita, Toshimasa & Nakawake, Yo, 2018. "Commitment-enhancing tools in Centipede games: Evidencing European–Japanese differences in trust and cooperation," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 61-72, January.
  8. Krockow, Eva M. & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2018. "Far but finite horizons promote cooperation in the Centipede game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 191-199.
  9. Briony D Pulford & Eva M Krockow & Andrew M Colman & Catherine L Lawrence, 2016. "Social Value Induction and Cooperation in the Centipede Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
  10. Andrew M. Colman & Briony D. Pulford, 2015. "Psychology of Game Playing: Introduction to a Special Issue," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-8, December.
  11. Gold, Natalie & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2015. "Do as I Say, Don’t Do as I Do: Differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 50-61.
  12. Eva M. Krockow & Briony D. Pulford & Andrew M. Colman, 2015. "Competitive Centipede Games: Zero-End Payoffs and Payoff Inequality Deter Reciprocal Cooperation," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, August.
  13. Pulford, Briony D. & Gill, Poonam, 2014. "Good luck, bad luck, and ambiguity aversion," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 159-166, March.
  14. Pulford, Briony D. & Gill, Poonam, 2014. "Good luck, bad luck, and ambiguity aversion," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 159-166, March.
  15. Gold, Natalie & Colman, Andrew M. & Pulford, Briony D., 2014. "Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 65-76, January.
  16. Gold, Natalie & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2013. "Your Money Or Your Life: Comparing Judgements In Trolley Problems Involving Economic And Emotional Harms, Injury And Death," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 213-233, July.
  17. Colman, Andrew M. & Pulford, Briony D. & Bolger, Fergus, 2007. "Asymmetric dominance and phantom decoy effects in games," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 193-206, November.
    RePEc:jdm:journl:v:9:y:2014:i:1:p:65-76 is not listed on IDEAS

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Despoina Alempaki & Andrew M Colman & Felix Koelle & Graham Loomes & Briony D Pulford, 2019. "Investigating the failure to best respond in experimental games," Discussion Papers 2019-13, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.

    Cited by:

    1. Della Valle, Nives & D'Arcangelo, Chiara & Faillo, Marco, 2024. "Promoting pro-environmental choices while addressing energy poverty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

  2. Gold, Natalie & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2015. "Do as I say, don't do as I do: differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109257, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Cited by:

    1. Sylvia Terbeck & Jaysan Charlesford & Heather Clemans & Emily Pope & Aimee Lee & Joshua Turner & Michaela Gummerum & Bettina Bussmann, 2021. "Physical Presence during Moral Action in Immersive Virtual Reality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-9, July.
    2. Nana Adrian & Ann-Kathrin Crede & Jonas Gehrlein, 2019. "Market Interaction and the Focus on Consequences in Moral Decision Making," Diskussionsschriften dp1905, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    3. Mata, André & Vaz, André & Mendonça, Bernardo, 2022. "Deliberate ignorance in moral dilemmas: Protecting judgment from conflicting information," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    4. Juergen Bracht & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2018. "Moral judgments, gender, and antisocial preferences: an experimental study," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 389-406, October.
    5. Juergen Bracht & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2016. "Moral Judgments, Gender, and Social Preferences: An Experimental Study," Working Papers halshs-01382464, HAL.
    6. Juergen Bracht & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2016. "Antisocial Attitudes, Gender and Moral Judgments: An Experimental Study," Post-Print halshs-01417152, HAL.

  3. Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2007. "Ambiguous games: Evidence for strategic ambiguity aversion," MPRA Paper 86345, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. David Kelsey & Sara le Roux, 2014. "An Experimental Study on the Effect of Ambiguity in a Coordination Game," Discussion Papers 1410, University of Exeter, Department of Economics.
    2. Eddai, Nahed & Guerdjikova, Ani, 2023. "To mitigate or to adapt: How to deal with optimism, pessimism and strategic ambiguity?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1-30.
    3. Nahed Eddai & Ani Guerdjikova, 2021. "To mitigate or to adapt: how to deal with optimism, pessimism and strategic ambiguity?," Working Papers hal-03590990, HAL.
    4. Peter Bayer & Ani Guerdjikova, 2022. "Optimism leads to optimality: Ambiguity in network formation," Working Papers hal-03542373, HAL.
    5. Eichberger, Jürgen & Kelsey, David, 2008. "Are the Treasures of Game Theory Ambiguous?," Papers 08-08, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    6. Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Colman, Andrew M., 2009. "Ambiguity aversion in the long run: Repeated decisions under risk and uncertainty," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 277-284, June.
    7. Edwards, Robert A. & Routledge, Robert R., 2022. "Information, Bertrand–Edgeworth competition and the law of one price," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    8. Ge Bai & Ranjani Krishnan, 2016. "Effects of Ambiguous Common Uncertainty on Employee Preference for Relative Performance Contracts," The Japanese Accounting Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 6, pages 65-93, December.
    9. Benjamin Miranda Tabak & Dimas Mateus Fazio, 2010. "Ambiguity Aversion and Illusion of Control in an Emerging Market: Are Individuals Subject to Behavioral Biases?," Chapters, in: Brian Bruce (ed.), Handbook of Behavioral Finance, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Cédric Gutierrez & Emmanuel Kemel, 2024. "Measuring natural source dependence," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 27(2), pages 379-416, April.
    11. Jean Desrochers & J. Francois Outreville, 2013. "Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Risk Taking: an experimental investigation of consumer behavior and demand for insurance," ICER Working Papers 10-2013, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research.
    12. R. R. Routledge & R. A. Edwards, 2020. "Ambiguity and price competition," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 231-256, March.
    13. Trautmann, Stefan T. & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2011. "Pricing risk and ambiguity: The effect of perspective taking," Kiel Working Papers 1727, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

Articles

  1. Despoina Alempaki & Andrew M. Colman & Felix Kölle & Graham Loomes & Briony D. Pulford, 2022. "Investigating the failure to best respond in experimental games," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 656-679, April.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  2. Briony D. Pulford & Andrew M. Colman & Graham Loomes, 2018. "Incentive Magnitude Effects in Experimental Games: Bigger is not Necessarily Better," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Frank Schweitzer & Luca Verginer & Giacomo Vaccario, 2020. "Should The Government Reward Cooperation? Insights From An Agent-Based Model Of Wealth Redistribution," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(07), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Vincent Srihaput & Kaylee Craplewe & Benjamin James Dyson, 2020. "Switching Competitors Reduces Win-Stay but Not Lose-Shift Behaviour: The Role of Outcome-Action Association Strength on Reinforcement Learning," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Despoina Alempaki & Andrew M Colman & Felix Koelle & Graham Loomes & Briony D Pulford, 2019. "Investigating the failure to best respond in experimental games," Discussion Papers 2019-13, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    4. Ben Balmford & Madeleine Marino & Oliver P. Hauser, 2024. "Voting Sustains Intergenerational Cooperation, Even When the Tipping Point Threshold is Ambiguous," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(1), pages 167-190, January.

  3. Krockow, Eva M. & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2018. "Far but finite horizons promote cooperation in the Centipede game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 191-199.

    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2024. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: the quantal hierarchy model of decision making," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 71-111, February.
    2. Benjamin Patrick Evans & Mikhail Prokopenko, 2021. "Bounded rationality for relaxing best response and mutual consistency: The Quantal Hierarchy model of decision-making," Papers 2106.15844, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.

  4. Briony D Pulford & Eva M Krockow & Andrew M Colman & Catherine L Lawrence, 2016. "Social Value Induction and Cooperation in the Centipede Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Krockow, Eva M. & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2018. "Far but finite horizons promote cooperation in the Centipede game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 191-199.

  5. Andrew M. Colman & Briony D. Pulford, 2015. "Psychology of Game Playing: Introduction to a Special Issue," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-8, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Saileshsingh Gunessee & Tom Lane, 2020. "Is Economics An Experimental Science? A Textbook Perspective," Discussion Papers 2020-16, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    2. Gunessee, Saileshsingh & Lane, Tom, 2023. "Changing perceptions about experimentation in economics: 50 years of evidence from principles textbooks," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Madjid Eshaghi Gordji & Gholamreza Askari, 2018. "Hyper-rational choice theory," Papers 1801.10520, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2018.
    4. Gholamreza Askari & Madjid Eshaghi Gordji & Choonkil Park, 2019. "The behavioral model and game theory," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-8, December.

  6. Gold, Natalie & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2015. "Do as I Say, Don’t Do as I Do: Differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 50-61.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Eva M. Krockow & Briony D. Pulford & Andrew M. Colman, 2015. "Competitive Centipede Games: Zero-End Payoffs and Payoff Inequality Deter Reciprocal Cooperation," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Briony D Pulford & Eva M Krockow & Andrew M Colman & Catherine L Lawrence, 2016. "Social Value Induction and Cooperation in the Centipede Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Wolfram Elsner, 2019. "Policy and state in complexity economics," Chapters, in: Nikolaos Karagiannis & John E. King (ed.), A Modern Guide to State Intervention, chapter 1, pages 13-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Krockow, Eva M. & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2018. "Far but finite horizons promote cooperation in the Centipede game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 191-199.

  8. Gold, Natalie & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2013. "Your Money Or Your Life: Comparing Judgements In Trolley Problems Involving Economic And Emotional Harms, Injury And Death," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 213-233, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Nana Adrian & Ann-Kathrin Crede & Jonas Gehrlein, 2019. "Market Interaction and the Focus on Consequences in Moral Decision Making," Diskussionsschriften dp1905, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    2. Sandra Baez & Michel Patiño-Sáenz & Jorge Martínez-Cotrina & Diego Mauricio Aponte & Juan Carlos Caicedo & Hernando Santamaría-García & Daniel Pastor & María Luz González-Gadea & Martín Haissiner & Ad, 2020. "The impact of legal expertise on moral decision-making biases," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Gold, Natalie & Pulford, Briony D. & Colman, Andrew M., 2015. "Do as I say, don't do as I do: differences in moral judgments do not translate into differences in decisions in real-life trolley problems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109257, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

  9. Colman, Andrew M. & Pulford, Briony D. & Bolger, Fergus, 2007. "Asymmetric dominance and phantom decoy effects in games," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 193-206, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Fabio Galeotti & Maria Montero & Anders Poulsen, 2018. "The Attraction and Compromise Effects in Bargaining: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print halshs-01820223, HAL.
    2. Pechtl, Hans, 2011. "Die Präferenzwirkung nicht-verfügbarer Alternativen: Der Phantomeffekt," Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere 01/2011, University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics.
    3. Matthew Kovach & Gerelt Tserenjigmid, 2023. "The Focal Quantal Response Equilibrium," Papers 2304.00438, arXiv.org.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (1) 2019-12-09
  2. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (1) 2019-12-09

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Briony D. Pulford should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.