IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/37201.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

An Evaluation of Revisions and Quality Aspects of Austrian Quarterly GDP Publications

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Bilek-Steindl
  • Petra Sauer

    (WIFO)

Abstract

This study presents results of a revision analysis of the Austrian Quarterly National Accounts using data between 1999 and 2008. In order to analyse different aspects of the revision pattern, a broad set of indicators is calculated and evaluated on the basis of a real time data set. Considering QNA data, adjusted and non-adjusted for working day and seasonal effects, in nominal and real terms, we find that mean revisions of GDP growth rates are unbiased over all observed revision windows. Revisions to aggregate GDP series are generally found to be smaller than those of its components. Some GDP aggregates (especially foreign trade and investment components) show relatively large and biased revisions. We also observe that changes in the release calendar and the introduction of flash estimates did not affect the reliability of first GDP estimates. In contrast, revisions were observed to decrease continuously over the sample period.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Bilek-Steindl & Petra Sauer, 2009. "An Evaluation of Revisions and Quality Aspects of Austrian Quarterly GDP Publications," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 37201, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:37201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/37201
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Gregory Mankiw & Matthew D. Shapiro, 1986. "News or Noise? An Analysis of GNP Revisions," NBER Working Papers 1939, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Marcus Scheiblecker & Sandra Bilek-Steindl & Michael Wüger, 2007. "Quarterly National Accounts Inventory of Austria. Description of Applied Methods and Data Sources," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 37249, March.
    3. Newey, Whitney & West, Kenneth, 2014. "A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 33(1), pages 125-132.
    4. Ross Meader, 2007. "Revisions to quarterly GDP growth and its components," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 1(11), pages 28-35, November.
    5. Faust, Jon & Rogers, John H & Wright, Jonathan H, 2005. "News and Noise in G-7 GDP Announcements," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(3), pages 403-419, June.
    6. Richard McKenzie, 2006. "Undertaking Revisions and Real-Time Data Analysis using the OECD Main Economic Indicators Original Release Data and Revisions Database," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2006/2, OECD Publishing.
    7. Marcus Scheiblecker & Sandra Bilek-Steindl, 2006. "Austrian GDP Flash Estimates: A Description of Methods," Austrian Economic Quarterly, WIFO, vol. 11(2), pages 79-85, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek RUSNAK, 2013. "Revisions to the Czech National Accounts: Properties and Predictability," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 63(3), pages 244-261, July.
    2. Karen E. Dynan & Douglas W. Elmendorf, 2001. "Do provisional estimates of output miss economic turning points?," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2001-52, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Jan Jacobs & Jan-Egbert Sturm, 2009. "The information content of KOF indicators on Swiss current account data revisions," OECD Journal: Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis, OECD Publishing, Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys, vol. 2008(2), pages 161-181.
    4. Kishor, N. Kundan, 2011. "Data revisions in India: Implications for monetary policy," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 164-173, April.
    5. Francisco Castro & Javier J. P√Ârez & Marta Rodr√Çguez-Vives, 2013. "Fiscal Data Revisions in Europe," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(6), pages 1187-1209, September.
    6. Ducoudré, Bruno & Hubert, Paul & Tabarly, Guilhem, 2020. "The state-dependence of output revisions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    7. Borup, Daniel & Schütte, Erik Christian Montes, 2022. "Asset pricing with data revisions," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    8. repec:wrk:wrkemf:35 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Thomas A. Knetsch & Hans‐Eggert Reimers, 2009. "Dealing with Benchmark Revisions in Real‐Time Data: The Case of German Production and Orders Statistics," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 71(2), pages 209-235, April.
    10. Jürgen Bierbaumer & Sandra Bilek-Steindl & Marcus Scheiblecker, 2015. "Analysis of the Revisions to the Quarterly National Accounts Since the Introduction of Flash Estimates in 2005," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 20(2), pages 14-30, February.
    11. Döpke, Jörg, 2004. "Real-time data and business cycle analysis in Germany," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2004,11, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    12. Kishor, N. Kundan, 2009. "Data Revisions in India and its Implications for Monetary Policy," MPRA Paper 16099, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. S. Borağan Aruoba, 2008. "Data Revisions Are Not Well Behaved," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(2‐3), pages 319-340, March.
    14. Jacobs, Jan P.A.M. & van Norden, Simon, 2011. "Modeling data revisions: Measurement error and dynamics of "true" values," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 161(2), pages 101-109, April.
    15. Cecilia Frale & Valentina Raponi, 2011. "Revisions in ocial data and forecasting," Working Papers LuissLab 1194, Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli.
    16. Jürgen Bierbaumer & Sandra Bilek-Steindl & Marcus Scheiblecker, 2014. "Revisionsanalyse der vierteljährlichen Volkswirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnung seit Einführung der Schnellschätzung im Jahr 2005," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(10), pages 693-710, October.
    17. Valentina Raponi & Cecilia Frale, 2014. "Revisions in official data and forecasting," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 23(3), pages 451-472, August.
    18. Bob Krebs, 2019. "Revisions to Quarterly National Accounts data in Luxembourg," BCL working papers 136, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    19. Robert R Tchaidze, 2001. "Estimating Taylor Rules in a Real Time Setting," Economics Working Paper Archive 457, The Johns Hopkins University,Department of Economics.
    20. Dean Croushore, 2009. "Commentary on Estimating U.S. output growth with vintage data in a state-space framework," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 91(Jul), pages 371-382.
    21. Pascal Bührig & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2015. "Revisionen der deutschen Industrieproduktion und die ifo Indikatoren," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68(21), pages 27-31, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Revisionsanalyse VGR;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:37201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.