IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ags/irricg/281810.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Handbook on Rice Policy for Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias, Annette
  • Molina, Imelda
  • Valera, Harold Glenn
  • Mottaleb, Khondoker Abdul
  • Mohanty, Samarendu

Abstract

Agricultural policies in Asia are historically pervasive, especially those pertaining to rice—a staple for half of the global population and a source of livelihood for nearly a billion people. Because of its strategic and political importance, the rice sector has been subject to a number of policy interventions. The objective of this handbook is to explain the current policy structure in the major rice-producing and rice-consuming countries in Asia. Many Asian countries have revamped their efforts in recent years to achieve rice self-sufficiency and stabilize domestic prices through stronger policy interventions. To insulate the domestic market from global uncertainty, a majority of Asian countries control the movement of rice in and out of the country through a variety of trade measures, including state trading and quantitative trade restrictions. A few rice-exporting countries set minimum export prices to ensure availability of rice for their domestic consumers by controlling exports and in some cases countries even temporarily banned rice exports. On the domestic front, many large rice-growing countries have increased the minimum support price for farmers and introduced many short-term policy measures to subsidize inputs such as fertilizer, seed, electricity, and fuel to expand domestic rice production. Net rice-importing countries, on the other hand, besides implementing policies to enhance domestic production by providing incentives to farmers, also provide a price subsidy on rice to make it affordable to poorer consumers. Governments often adopt highly crafted programs designed to raise the income of farmers by enhancing rice production. This includes the use of price floors, subsidized loans, payments to encourage fallow area, etc. The policies related to production, consumption, and stock of rice can be broadly categorized as domestic policies since any change in these policies mainly affects the behavior of local producers or consumers. In this handbook, rice policies pursued by the major rice-producing and rice-consuming countries in Asia are compiled. This handbook clearly demonstrates that a number of major rice-exporting countries adopted some measures to create a buffer domestic rice market, such as imposing an export ban for a short period and setting minimum export prices to ensure an available rice supply in the domestic market (India and Vietnam). In contrast, major rice-importing countries lifted the tariff on imported rice without giving any special treatment to domestic producers to ensure an available rice supply in the domestic market (Nepal and Bangladesh).

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias, Annette & Molina, Imelda & Valera, Harold Glenn & Mottaleb, Khondoker Abdul & Mohanty, Samarendu, 2012. "Handbook on Rice Policy for Asia," IRRI Books, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), number 281810.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:irricg:281810
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.281810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/281810/files/Handbook.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.281810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    • Tobias, Annette & Molina, Imelda & Valera, Harold Glenn & Mottaleb, Khondoker Abdul & Mohanty, Samarendu, 2012. "Handbook on Rice Policy for Asia," IRRI Books, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), number 164450.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Hung-Hao & de Gorter, Harry, 2004. "Tariff Rate Import Quotas, Domestic Market Structure And Agricultural Support Program: The Case Of Taiwanese Rice Import," 2004 Annual Meeting, June 30-July 2, 2004, Honolulu, Hawaii 36274, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Yang, Min-Hsien & Blandford, David, 2011. "Asian Rice Policies and WTO Commitments on Domestic Support Under Existing and Proposed Doha Round Provisions," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103665, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Choi, Jung-Sup & Sumner, Daniel A., 2000. "Opening Markets while Maintaining Protection: Tariff Rate Quotas in Korea and Japan," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 91-102, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Md. Monirul Islam & Shusuke Matsushita & Ryozo Noguchi & Tofael Ahamed, 2022. "A damage-based crop insurance system for flash flooding: a satellite remote sensing and econometric approach," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 47-89, February.
    2. Dick Durevall & Roy Weide, 2017. "Importing High Food Prices by Exporting: Rice Prices in Lao PDR," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 164-181, February.
    3. Mishra, B. & Poudel, K.L. & Mishra, D.R., 2016. "Effect of Change in Indian Rice Price on Nepalese Rice Market: A Partial Equilibrium Model," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 29(1).
    4. Nitta, Atomu & Yamamoto, Yasutaka & Kondo, Katsunobu & Sawauchi, Daisuke, 2020. "Direct payments to Japanese farmers: Do they reduce rice income inequality? Lessons for other Asian countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 968-981.
    5. Briones, Roehlano M. & Tolin, Lovely Ann C., 2015. "Options for Supporting Rice Farmers Under a Post-QR Regime: Review and Assessment," Research Paper Series DP 2015-46, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    6. Apollo Uma, 2022. "A Historical Perspective of The Impact of Rice Policies and Strategies in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(9), pages 29-35, September.
    7. Briones, Roehlano M. & Tolin, Lovely Ann C., 2015. "Options for Supporting Rice Farmers Under a Post-QR Regime: Review and Assessment," Discussion Papers DP 2015-46, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    8. Yeong Tey & Mark Brindal, 2014. "Adapting importation policy to global commodity markets: implications of rice import allocation in Singapore," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(8), pages 1277-1293, December.
    9. Durevall, Dick & van der Weide, Roy, 2014. "Importing High Food Prices by Exporting: Rice Prices in Lao PDR," Working Papers in Economics 607, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Risti Permani, 2021. "FTA, Exchange rate pass‐through and export price behavior – Lessons from the Australian dairy sector," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(1), pages 192-221, January.
    2. Svetlana Ivanova & Artyom Latyshov, 2018. "Sustainable entrepreneurship: agrarian policy in South Korea," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(4), pages 748-760, June.
    3. Svetlana Ivanova & Artyom Latyshov, 2018. "Sustainable entrepreneurship: agrarian policy in South Korea," Post-Print hal-01857436, HAL.
    4. Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju, 2005. "Modeling tariff rate quotas in the South African livestock industry," Master's Degree Theses 28064, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. Jones, Keithly G. & Blayney, Donald P., 2012. "Implications of the South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement on South Korean Dairy Product Imports," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124823, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Garcia, Roberto J., 2015. "No Way to Meet Commitments for Norway’s Meat Imports: An Assessment of WTO Disciplines on Market Access in Agriculture," Working Paper Series 03-2015, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
    7. Grant, Jason & Xie, Chaoping & Boys, Kathryn, 2022. "Firms, Agricultural Imports, and Tariff-Rate Quotas: An Assessment of China’s Wheat, Corn, and Rice Imports Using Firm-Level Data," Commissioned Papers 321889, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    8. James A. Giesecke & Nhi Hoang Tran & Erwin L. Corong & Steven Jaffee, 2013. "Rice Land Designation Policy in Vietnam and the Implications of Policy Reform for Food Security and Economic Welfare," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(9), pages 1202-1218, September.
    9. Meilke, Karl D. & Rude, James & Burfisher, Mary E. & Bredahl, Maury E., 2001. "Market Access: Issues And Options In The Agricultural Negotiations," Commissioned Papers 14625, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    10. Permani, Risti, 2020. "FTA, Exchange rate pass-through and export price behavior – Lessons from the Australian dairy sector," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 65(01), January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:irricg:281810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deirrph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.