IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zna/indecs/v18y2020i4p408-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Croatian crisis management system's response to COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of a systemic resilience model

Author

Listed:
  • Armano Srbljinoviæ

    (Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Jasmina Božiæ

    (University of Zagreb - Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Brian D. Fath

    (Towson University - Department of Biological Sciences, Towson, Maryland, The United States of America; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis - Advanced Systems Analysis Program, Laxenburg, Austria)

Abstract

We analyse the Croatian crisis management system's response to COVID-19 pandemic in terms of Fath, Dean, and Katzmair's [1] model of resilience in social systems. We find that the Croatian crisis management system has successfully completed one cycle of the model. However, if the system is to achieve resilience, it also needs to replace the regime from before the crisis with a new regime that will simultaneously enable a life of relative normalcy and contain an excessive spread of the virus. Strengthening social cohesion and more bottom-up, emergent leadership might facilitate the search for a new regime. Small, local outbreaks represent small-scale disturbances that provide opportunities for the development of cohesion and bottom-up leadership from local, county, municipal and city-levels to the national level. The model used in this article better conveys the underlying complexity of crisis management systems than "the hammer and the dance" model, whereas the latter is better suited for public communication. Future work should extend this case study in terms of modelling approaches, the sample of countries, and the time covered. It can also be extended to lower, sub-national, as well as higher, supra-national levels, such as the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Armano Srbljinoviæ & Jasmina Božiæ & Brian D. Fath, 2020. "Croatian crisis management system's response to COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of a systemic resilience model," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 18(4), pages 408-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:18:y:2020:i:4:p:408-424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://indecs.eu/2020/indecs2020-pp408-424.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Kharrazi & Brian D. Fath & Harald Katzmair, 2016. "Advancing Empirical Approaches to the Concept of Resilience: A Critical Examination of Panarchy, Ecological Information, and Statistical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Burkhard, Benjamin & Fath, Brian D. & Müller, Felix, 2011. "Adapting the adaptive cycle: Hypotheses on the development of ecosystem properties and services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(16), pages 2878-2890.
    3. Auad, Guillermo & Blythe, Jonathan & Coffman, Kim & Fath, Brian D., 2018. "A dynamic management framework for socio-ecological system stewardship: A case study for the United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management," MarXiv nurca, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Džakula, Aleksandar & Banadinović, Maja & Lovrenčić, Iva Lukačević & Vajagić, Maja & Dimova, Antoniya & Rohova, Maria & Minev, Mincho & Scintee, Silvia Gabriela & Vladescu, Cristian & Farcasanu, Dana , 2022. "A comparison of health system responses to COVID-19 in Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania in 2020," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(5), pages 456-464.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tzen-Ying Ling, 2022. "Dynamic Flood Resilience Typology: A Systemic Transitional Adaptation from Peitou Plateau, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Patricia Abduragimova & Brian D. Fath & Christian Gulas & Harald Katzmair, 2023. "Participatory approach for assessing institutional resilience: a case study of crises in Austria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9201-9225, September.
    3. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Puzachenko, Y.G. & Sandlersky, R.B. & Sankovski, A.G., 2016. "Analysis of spatial and temporal organization of biosphere using solar reflectance data from MODIS satellite," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 27-36.
    5. Qi Fu & Bo Li & Linlin Yang & Zhilong Wu & Xinshi Zhang, 2015. "Ecosystem Services Evaluation and Its Spatial Characteristics in Central Asia’s Arid Regions: A Case Study in Altay Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo & Paletto, Alessandro & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 12-23.
    7. Darnhofer, Ika, 2021. "Resilience or how do we enable agricultural systems to ride the waves of unexpected change?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Xupu Li & Shuangshuang Li & Yufeng Zhang & Patrick J. O’Connor & Liwei Zhang & Junping Yan, 2021. "Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment under Multiple Indicators," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Auad, Guillermo & Blythe, Jonathan & Coffman, Kim & Fath, Brian D., 2018. "A dynamic management framework for socio-ecological system stewardship: A case study for the United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management," MarXiv nurca, Center for Open Science.
    10. Maebe, Laura & Dufrêne, Marc & Claessens, Hugues & Maréchal, Kevin & Ligot, Gauthier & Messier, Christian, 2023. "The Navigate framework: How the ecosystem services and resilience concepts can help us navigate in the current crises," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Bo Wang & Heng Wang & Xianfeng Zeng & Baojun Li, 2022. "Towards a Better Understanding of Social-Ecological Systems for Basin Governance: A Case Study from the Weihe River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Ali Kharrazi & Shogo Kudo & Doreen Allasiw, 2018. "Addressing Misconceptions to the Concept of Resilience in Environmental Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Rebecca Mitchell & Roger Maull & Simon Pearson & Steve Brewer & Martin Collison, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on the UK fresh food supply chain," Papers 2006.00279, arXiv.org.
    14. Richard Morris & Shannon Davis & Gwen-Aëlle Grelet & Crile Doscher & Pablo Gregorini, 2024. "A Model for Spatially Explicit Landscape Configuration and Ecosystem Service Performance, ESMAX: Model Description and Explanation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Tittonell, Pablo, 2020. "Assessing resilience and adaptability in agroecological transitions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Yi Liu & Peng Li & Zhiwei Zhang, 2018. "Resilient or Not: A Comparative Case Study of Ten Local Water Markets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Yan, Zhigang & Li, Junqing, 2017. "Giant panda survival crisis remains serious based on the ecosystem catastrophe model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 128-134.
    18. Coscieme, Luca & Pulselli, Federico M. & Jørgensen, Sven E. & Bastianoni, Simone & Marchettini, Nadia, 2013. "Thermodynamics-based categorization of ecosystems in a socio-ecological context," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 258(C), pages 1-8.
    19. Tianhong Li & Yao Ding, 2017. "Spatial disparity dynamics of ecosystem service values and GDP in Shaanxi Province, China in the last 30 years," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Spoon, Jeremy & Gerkey, Drew & Chhetri, Ram Bahadur & Rai, Alisa & Basnet, Umesh, 2020. "Navigating multidimensional household recoveries following the 2015 Nepal earthquakes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19 pandemic; crisis management; societal resilience; systemic resilience; the hammer and the dance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H12 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Crisis Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:18:y:2020:i:4:p:408-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Josip Stepanic (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.