IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v25y2023i9d10.1007_s10668-022-02430-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory approach for assessing institutional resilience: a case study of crises in Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Abduragimova

    (Towson University)

  • Brian D. Fath

    (Towson University
    International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis)

  • Christian Gulas

    (FASresearch)

  • Harald Katzmair

    (FASresearch)

Abstract

This paper outlines the procedure of employing novel software tools within a series of participatory workshops designed for measuring and monitoring the resilience of Austria's socioeconomic system based on network analysis and systems research. This study employs the principles of the four-stage adaptive cycle to quantify the perspectives of major stakeholders regarding resilience readiness in Austrian society and to explore the implications. At the FASresearch company in Vienna, 278 representatives from 15 key sectors of Austrian society were asked to estimate the resilience of their respective sectors and identify the key resilience factors for each sector. Results pinpoint the most critical stakeholders and resilience factors, highlight the importance of quality relationships among stakeholders, and indicate that while stakeholders accurately perceive the stages of growth (r), equilibrium (K), and regeneration (α), they tend to underestimate the significance of the final (Ω) stage of the adaptive cycle, characterized by disturbance and collapse of outdated systems. Improved recognition and preparation for each stage may result in the increased resilience of each sector to potential crises in the future. Notably, perspectives regarding resilience in the face of a crisis were gathered prior to the occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, in addition to fulfilling an analytic-diagnostic function, resilience monitoring techniques are also intended as an adaptive tool for novel resilience management.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Abduragimova & Brian D. Fath & Christian Gulas & Harald Katzmair, 2023. "Participatory approach for assessing institutional resilience: a case study of crises in Austria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9201-9225, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02430-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02430-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-022-02430-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-022-02430-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Kharrazi & Brian D. Fath & Harald Katzmair, 2016. "Advancing Empirical Approaches to the Concept of Resilience: A Critical Examination of Panarchy, Ecological Information, and Statistical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Kishita, Yusuke & McLellan, Benjamin C. & Giurco, Damien & Aoki, Kazumasu & Yoshizawa, Go & Handoh, Itsuki C., 2017. "Designing backcasting scenarios for resilient energy futures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 114-125.
    3. Conz, Elisa & Magnani, Giovanna, 2020. "A dynamic perspective on the resilience of firms: A systematic literature review and a framework for future research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 400-412.
    4. Burkhard, Benjamin & Fath, Brian D. & Müller, Felix, 2011. "Adapting the adaptive cycle: Hypotheses on the development of ecosystem properties and services," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(16), pages 2878-2890.
    5. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.
    6. David Schiefer & Jolanda Noll, 2017. "The Essentials of Social Cohesion: A Literature Review," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 579-603, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Andrea Chiarini & Rocco Palumbo, 2024. "Mastering the interplay of organizational resilience and sustainability: Insights from a hybrid literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1418-1446, February.
    2. Armano Srbljinoviæ & Jasmina Božiæ & Brian D. Fath, 2020. "Croatian crisis management system's response to COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of a systemic resilience model," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 18(4), pages 408-424.
    3. Tzen-Ying Ling, 2022. "Dynamic Flood Resilience Typology: A Systemic Transitional Adaptation from Peitou Plateau, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Ran, Rong & Zhang, Jie & Yang, Xiaoran & Chen, Yejing, 2024. "Can technological diversity drive firm resilience? Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Arpita Chari & Denis Niedenzu & Mélanie Despeisse & Carla Gonçalves Machado & João Domingues Azevedo & Rui Boavida‐Dias & Björn Johansson, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains—Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2500-2517, July.
    6. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Soumyadeb Chowdhury & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Prasanta Kumar Dey, 2024. "Unearthing the interplay between organisational resources, knowledge and industry 4.0 analytical decision support tools to achieve sustainability and supply chain wellbeing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1321-1368, November.
    7. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Baier-Fuentes, Hugo & Andrade-Valbuena, Nelson A. & Huertas Gonzalez-Serrano, Maria & Gaviria-Marin, Magaly, 2023. "Bricolage as an effective tool for the survival of owner-managed SMEs during crises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Sara Perotti & Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Marco Melacini, 2022. "Assessing the environmental impact of logistics sites through CO2eq footprint computation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1679-1694, May.
    10. Georg Kanitsar, 2019. "Segmented Labor Markets – Segmented Solidarities?," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 2019(2), pages 179-201.
    11. Ana Carolina Silva & Catarina Moreira Marques & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "A Simulation Approach for the Design of More Sustainable and Resilient Supply Chains in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Basu R, Jothi & Abdulrahman, Muhammad D. & Yuvaraj, M., 2023. "Improving agility and resilience of automotive spares supply chain: The additive manufacturing enabled truck model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Richard Morris & Shannon Davis & Gwen-Aëlle Grelet & Crile Doscher & Pablo Gregorini, 2024. "A Model for Spatially Explicit Landscape Configuration and Ecosystem Service Performance, ESMAX: Model Description and Explanation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    14. Elena Casprini & Tommaso Pucci & Lorenzo Zanni, 2023. "From growth goals to proactive organizational resilience: first evidence in women-led and non-women-led Italian wineries," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1017-1036, April.
    15. Puzachenko, Y.G. & Sandlersky, R.B. & Sankovski, A.G., 2016. "Analysis of spatial and temporal organization of biosphere using solar reflectance data from MODIS satellite," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 27-36.
    16. Ghada Talat Alhothali & Haya Al-Dajani, 2022. "Emotions and Resilience in Saudi Women’s Digital Entrepreneurship during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Stavros Sindakis & Saloome Showkat & Jiafu Su, 2023. "Unveiling the Influence: Exploring the Impact of Interrelationships among E-Commerce Supply Chain Members on Supply Chain Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-27, December.
    18. María Luisa Méndez & Gabriel Otero & Felipe Link & Ernesto López Morales & Modesto Gayo, 2021. "Neighbourhood cohesion as a form of privilege," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(8), pages 1691-1711, June.
    19. Jacobsen, Jannes & Schieferdecker, David & Gerstorf, Denis & Hutter, Swen & Specht, Jule, 2022. "Long-Term Dynamics of Voluntary Engagement: Differentiating Social Structural from Cohort and Period Effects," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Online Fi, pages 1-1.
    20. Surajit Bag & Muhammad Sabbir Rahman, 2024. "Navigating circular economy: Unleashing the potential of political and supply chain analytics skills among top supply chain executives for environmental orientation, regenerative supply chain practice," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 504-528, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:25:y:2023:i:9:d:10.1007_s10668-022-02430-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.