IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnaim/v1y2017i2p13-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conceptual Framework For Measuring The Performance of Big Data Analytics Process

Author

Listed:
  • Ismail Mohamed Ali

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia)

  • Yusmadi Yah Jusoh

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia)

  • Rusli Abdullah

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Putra Malaysia)

  • Rozi Nor Haizan Nor

Abstract

Processes are described as a sequence of steps which result in a specific output based on a given input. The use of term, process, is common and used in different settings including more recently as big data analytics(BDA) process, and Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) process for traditional data warehousing and business intelligence in the past. BDA process starts from data acquisition and selection of the sources, to data preparation, analysis and modeling, to visualiza-tion and interpretation phases. Looking at big data analytics in a process perspective has major benefits since improving process drives a better outcome. This study focuses on how the performance of BDA process can be measured. The major con-tribution will be performance measurement framework of BDA process. The concept of process performance is broadly covered in the literature, mainly in the areas of business process and software process. Thus, process performance measures are available. Time, quality, cost, and flexibility are four of them. Do they apply to BDA process? This is a major question to be dealt with in this research. The overall structure of this research is shown in Figure 1.

Suggested Citation

  • Ismail Mohamed Ali & Yusmadi Yah Jusoh & Rusli Abdullah & Rozi Nor Haizan Nor, 2017. "A Conceptual Framework For Measuring The Performance of Big Data Analytics Process," Acta Informatica Malaysia (AIM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 13-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:13-14
    DOI: 10.26480/aim.02.2017.13.14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/download/655/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/aim.02.2017.13.14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diana Heckl & Jürgen Moormann, 2010. "Process Performance Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 2, pages 115-135, Springer.
    2. Michael Leyer & Diana Heckl & Jürgen Moormann, 2015. "Process Performance Measurement," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 2, edition 2, pages 227-241, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Afflerbach & Martin Hohendorf & Jonas Manderscheid, 0. "Design it like Darwin - A value-based application of evolutionary algorithms for proper and unambiguous business process redesign," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    2. M. Ishaq Bhatti & H. Awan & Z. Razaq, 2014. "The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 3127-3143, November.
    3. Ionuț NICA & Nora CHIRIȚĂ & Ștefan IONESCU, 2021. "Using of KPIs and Dashboard in the analysis of Nike company's performance management," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(1(626), S), pages 61-84, Spring.
    4. Heidari, Farideh & Loucopoulos, Pericles, 2014. "Quality evaluation framework (QEF): Modeling and evaluating quality of business processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 193-223.
    5. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Determinants of successful adoption of the Balanced Scorecard in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises," OSF Preprints 5hx2r, Center for Open Science.
    6. Patrick Afflerbach & Martin Hohendorf & Jonas Manderscheid, 2017. "Design it like Darwin - A value-based application of evolutionary algorithms for proper and unambiguous business process redesign," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1101-1121, October.
    7. Martin Lehnert & Maximilian Röglinger & Johannes Seyfried, 2018. "Prioritization of Interconnected Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(2), pages 95-114, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnaim:v:1:y:2017:i:2:p:13-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://actainformaticamalaysia.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.