IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/jumsac/295048.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The hidden potential of boredom – How does the relative perception of boredom influence concentration and task performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Coen, Joshua W.

Abstract

As boredom in the workplace is an important factor with widespread consequences, research interest in this topic is very high. This paper proposes a way of decreasing workplace boredom and thereby the negative effects associated with it. Based on literature about contrast effects, this paper develops the hypothesis that contrast between boredom levels leads to higher or lower evaluations of task boredom in a subsequent cognitive task. In an online experiment, this theory was tested. The results show that the same task is perceived as less boring when preceded by a monotonous and unchallenging task. An opposite effect for highly interesting tasks could not be determined. In addition, it was found that the boredom induction is linked to significantly lower concentration and that both boredom and inattention decrease cognitive performance. As proposed, the performance influence of boredom transcended tasks, with task C boredom fully mediating the relationship between task 1 boredom and cognitive performance. Further insights and implications are discussed, including a possible bidirectional causal relationship between boredom and inattention. The results implicate that boredom can be deliberately influenced through contextual cues and task order to mitigate its disadvantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Coen, Joshua W., 2023. "The hidden potential of boredom – How does the relative perception of boredom influence concentration and task performance?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(3), pages 617-633.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:295048
    DOI: 10.5282/jums/v8i3pp617-633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/295048/1/5224-3528.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5282/jums/v8i3pp617-633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lotta Harju & Jari J. Hakanen & Wilmar B. Schaufeli, 2014. "Job boredom and its correlates in 87 Finnish organizations," Post-Print hal-02312429, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van der Velde, Lucas, 2022. "Phasing out: Routine tasks and retirement," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 784-803.
    2. Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz & Gozde Erbudak & Sema Gunduz, 2022. "An exploration of the causes and effects of flight attendant fatigue in Turkish aviation," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(5), pages 01-17, July.
    3. Aziz Chtioui & Lamia Hechiche Salah, 2021. "Le bore-out : quand ennui et épuisement professionnel vont " de pair ". une compréhension en profondeur d'un phénomène en gestation," Post-Print hal-04694203, HAL.
    4. Chillakuri, Bharat, 2020. "Examining the Role of Supervisor Support on Generation Z's Intention to Quit," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 23(2), pages 408-430, November.
    5. Karatepe, Osman M. & Kim, Taegoo Terry, 2020. "Investigating the selected consequences of boreout among cabin crew," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:295048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jums.academy/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.