IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/235960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decentralized Autonomous Organization

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan, Samer
  • De Filippi, Primavera

Abstract

A DAO is a blockchain-based system that enables people to coordinate and govern themselves mediated by a set of self-executing rules deployed on a public blockchain, and whose governance is decentralised (i.e., independent from central control).

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan, Samer & De Filippi, Primavera, 2021. "Decentralized Autonomous Organization," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(2), pages 1-10.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:235960
    DOI: 10.14763/2021.2.1556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/235960/1/1764253469.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2021.2.1556?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Shubik, 1962. "Incentives, Decentralized Control, the Assignment of Joint Costs and Internal Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 325-343, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellie Rennie & Michael Zargham & Joshua Tan & Luke Miller & Jonathan Abbott & Kelsie Nabben & Primavera de Filippi, 2022. "Towards a participatory digital ethnography of blockchain governance," Post-Print hal-03882048, HAL.
    2. Daum Kim & Jiro Kokuryo, 2024. "Establishing altruistic ethics to use technology for Social Welfare—How Japan manages Web3 and self-sovereign identity in local communities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Carlo Gola & Valentina Cappa & Patrizio Fiorenza & Paolo Granata & Federica Laurino & Lorenzo Lesina & Francesco Lorizzo & Gabriele Marcelli, 2023. "The governance of blockchains and system based on distributed ledger technology," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 773, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. Nils Augustin & Andreas Eckhardt & Alexander Willem Jong, 2023. "Understanding decentralized autonomous organizations from the inside," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Christian Ziegler & Syeda Rabab Zehra, 2023. "Decoding Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: A Content Analysis Approach to Understanding Scoring Platforms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Herbert Jodlbauer & Manuel Brunner & Nadine Bachmann & Shailesh Tripathi & Matthias Thürer, 2023. "Supply Chain Management: A Structured Narrative Review of Current Challenges and Recommendations for Action," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Goldberg, Mitchell & Schär, Fabian, 2023. "Metaverse governance: An empirical analysis of voting within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Naudts, Ellen, 2023. "The future of DAOs in finance - in need of legal status," Occasional Paper Series 331, European Central Bank.
    9. Ding, Yibo & Sun, Xianzhuo & Ruan, Jiaqi & Shi, Wenzhuo & Wu, Huayi & Xu, Zhao, 2024. "Customized decentralized autonomous organization based optimal energy management for smart buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    10. Santana, Carlos & Albareda, Laura, 2022. "Blockchain and the emergence of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs): An integrative model and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    11. Yan Liu & Chao Shang, 2022. "Application of Blockchain Technology in Agricultural Water Rights Trade Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, June.
    12. Liudmila Zavolokina & Andreas Hein & Arthur Carvalho & Gerhard Schwabe & Helmut Krcmar, 2024. "Preface to the special issue on “Enterprise and organizational applications of distributed ledger technologies”," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-5, December.
    13. Colin Gilson & Sarah Bouraga, 2024. "Enhancing the Democratic Nature of Voting Processes within Decentralized Autonomous Organizations," Post-Print hal-04814435, HAL.
    14. Onjewu, Adah-Kole Emmanuel & Walton, Nigel & Koliousis, Ioannis, 2023. "Blockchain agency theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Darcy W. E. Allen & Chris Berg & Aaron M. Lane & Trent MacDonald & Jason Potts, 2023. "The exchange theory of web3 governance," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(4), pages 659-675, November.
    16. Allen, Darcy W.E. & Berg, Chris & Lane, Aaron M., 2023. "Why airdrop cryptocurrency tokens?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Bohn, Stephan & Gümüsay, Ali Aslan & von Richthofen, Georg & Reischauer, Georg, 2023. "Digital organising," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15.
    18. Andry Alamsyah & Gede Natha Wijaya Kusuma & Dian Puteri Ramadhani, 2024. "A Review on Decentralized Finance Ecosystems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-29, February.
    19. Tara Merk, 2024. "Why to DAO: a narrative analysis of the drivers of tokenized Exit to Community," Papers 2407.14327, arXiv.org.
    20. Darcy W. E. Allen & Jason Potts & Julian Waters-Lynch & Max Parasol, 2024. "Costly Signalling in DAOs," Papers 2406.18457, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yves Sprumont, 2010. "An Axiomatization of the Serial Cost-Sharing Method," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1711-1748, September.
    2. Hervé Moulin & Yves Sprumont, 2007. "Fair allocation of production externalities : recent results," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 117(1), pages 7-36.
    3. David Lowing & Léa Munich & Kevin Techer, 2024. "Allocating the common costs of a public service operator: an axiomatic approach," Working Papers of BETA 2024-03, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Chessa, Michela & Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Lardon, Aymeric & Yamada, Takashi, 2023. "An experiment on the Nash program: A comparison of two strategic mechanisms implementing the Shapley value," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 88-104.
    5. Hougaard, Jens Leth & Smilgins, Aleksandrs, 2016. "Risk capital allocation with autonomous subunits: The Lorenz set," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 151-157.
    6. Casajus, André & Huettner, Frank, 2014. "Weakly monotonic solutions for cooperative games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 162-172.
    7. G Reinhardt & M Dada, 2005. "Allocating the gains from resource pooling with the Shapley Value," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 997-1000, August.
    8. Zhengxing Zou & René Brink & Youngsub Chun & Yukihiko Funaki, 2021. "Axiomatizations of the proportional division value," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 35-62, July.
    9. Shan, Erfang & Cui, Zeguang & Lyu, Wenrong, 2023. "Gain–loss and new axiomatizations of the Shapley value," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Hervé Moulin & Alison Watts, 1996. "Two versions of the tragedy of the commons," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 2(1), pages 399-421, December.
    11. Watts, Alison, 2002. "Uniqueness of equilibrium in cost sharing games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 47-70, February.
    12. Martin Shubik, 2011. "The Present and Future of Game Theory," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000173, David K. Levine.
    13. Ghintran, Amandine, 2013. "Weighted position values," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 157-163.
    14. Moulin, Herve & Sprumont, Yves, 2006. "Responsibility and cross-subsidization in cost sharing," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 152-188, April.
    15. Justin Yifu Lin, 2007. "Development and Transition : Idea, Strategy, and Viability," Development Economics Working Papers 22709, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    16. Ziv Hellman & Ron Peretz, 2015. "Values for Cooperative Games over Graphs and Games With Inadmissible Coalitions," Working Papers 2015-04, Bar-Ilan University, Department of Economics.
    17. Aguiar, Victor H. & Pongou, Roland & Tondji, Jean-Baptiste, 2018. "A non-parametric approach to testing the axioms of the Shapley value with limited data," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-63.
    18. Jop Schouten & Mirjam GrooteSchaarsberg & Peter Borm, 2024. "Cost sharing methods for capacity restricted cooperative purchasing situations," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 28(2), pages 347-390, June.
    19. Sprumont, Yves, 2000. "Coherent Cost-Sharing Rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 126-144, October.
    20. Eric Friedman, 1997. "Paths in Additive Cost Sharing," Departmental Working Papers 199706, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:235960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.