IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/214075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How US-made rules shape internet governance in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tusikov, Natasha

Abstract

The United States is shaping Chinese internet governance by embedding US-preferred standards for the protection of intellectual property rights within Chinese platforms. As a result, the China-based Alibaba e-commerce giant has instituted US-drafted rules to deal with the sale of counterfeit goods. To explain this development, the article introduces the concept of compliance-plus regulation, which draws from regulatory theory and socio-legal studies to account for the state coercively pressuring one set of private actors (platforms) to regulate "voluntarily" on behalf of another set of private actors (rights holders). Drawing upon an analysis of documents from the US government, US industry, and Alibaba, the article finds that while economic pressure on Alibaba was a central factor, there are also common economic interests between Alibaba and US and European rights holders.

Suggested Citation

  • Tusikov, Natasha, 2019. "How US-made rules shape internet governance in China," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214075
    DOI: 10.14763/2019.2.1408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/214075/1/IntPolRev-2019-2-1408.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2019.2.1408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Picciotto,Sol, 2011. "Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107005013, September.
    2. Picciotto,Sol, 2011. "Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521181969, September.
    3. Braithwaite,John & Drahos,Peter, 2000. "Global Business Regulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521784993, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shaun Elder, 2014. "Does the GFC as a change agent of financial regulatory models and approaches in Europe provide lessons for Asia?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 419-430, December.
    2. ., 2013. "The domestic politics of international tax cooperation in the United States and Switzerland," Chapters, in: The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance, chapter 5, pages 111-140, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Richard Eccleston, 2013. "The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14033.
    4. ., 2013. "Politics without conviction: the OECD’s failed Harmful Tax Competition initiative," Chapters, in: The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance, chapter 3, pages 60-80, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. José Carlos Marques, 2019. "Private regulatory capture via harmonization: An analysis of global retailer regulatory intermediaries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 157-176, June.
    6. ., 2013. "The financial crisis and the politics of international tax cooperation," Chapters, in: The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance, chapter 4, pages 81-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Karin Buhmann, 2016. "Public Regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in Recent United Nations Instruments on Business and Human Rights and the Juridification of CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(4), pages 699-714, July.
    8. Francesco Denozza, 2019. "Spettri del mitico ordo: diritto e mercato nel neoliberalismo (Ghosts of mytical ordo: Law and markets in neoliberalism)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 72(288), pages 327-348.
    9. Sol Picciotto, 2022. "Technocracy in the Era of Twitter: Between intergovernmentalism and supranational technocratic politics in global tax governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 634-652, July.
    10. Bedford Kate, 2020. "Law, Gender, and Development: Potent Hauntings," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 229-264, January.
    11. Elin Jönsson, 2023. "Struggles for Regulatory Hardening: Exploring Swedish Politics on Corporate Social Responsibility," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 63(5), pages 1184-1198.
    12. Lips, Wouter, 2018. "Great powers in global tax governance: a comparison of the US role in the CRS and BEPS," SocArXiv ewd3j, Center for Open Science.
    13. Sorin-George Toma & Paul Marinescu & Ionut Constantin, 2016. "How the Ten Largest Corporations of the World Evolved in the Period 2014-2015," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 61-66, February.
    14. Glenn Morgan, 2014. "Financialization and the multinational corporation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(2), pages 183-197, May.
    15. Sol Picciotto, . "International tax, regulatory arbitrage and the growth of transnational corporations," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    16. Nicholas A. Phelps & Andrew Wood, 2018. "Promoting the global economy: The uneven development of the location consulting industry," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(6), pages 1336-1354, September.
    17. Ruth Mayne & Duncan Green & Irene Guijt & Martin Walsh & Richard English & Paul Cairney, 2018. "Using evidence to influence policy: Oxfam’s experience," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. David Monciardini & Guido Conaldi, 2019. "The European regulation of corporate social responsibility: The role of beneficiaries' intermediaries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 240-259, June.
    19. Tan Celine, 2019. "Beyond the ‘Moments’ of Law and Development: Critical Reflections on Law and Development Scholarship in a Globalized Economy," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 285-321, June.
    20. Daniel Fitzpatrick & Rebecca Monson, 2022. "Property rights and climate migration: Adaptive governance in the South Pacific," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 519-535, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.