IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v63y2023i5p1184-1198..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Struggles for Regulatory Hardening: Exploring Swedish Politics on Corporate Social Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Elin Jönsson

Abstract

In recent years, the idea of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has undergone a shift towards hardening, illustrated by a wave of new mandatory and state-based regulation. This article aims to understand the dynamic behind this shift, by studying struggles for regulatory hardening in the Swedish Parliament. Drawing on a critical theory of contradictions, it proposes an understanding of CSR as a contradictory social formation, which structures the parliamentary struggles. Moreover, it suggests that although the hardening trend could amount to a crisis of the traditional understanding of CSR, politicians remain embedded in a neoliberal logic of regulation. The article ends with a call for research to continue to explore alternative roads towards minimizing corporate harm in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Elin Jönsson, 2023. "Struggles for Regulatory Hardening: Exploring Swedish Politics on Corporate Social Responsibility," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 63(5), pages 1184-1198.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:63:y:2023:i:5:p:1184-1198.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azac082
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Gerard Ruggie, 2018. "Multinationals as global institution: Power, authority and relative autonomy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 317-333, September.
    2. Picciotto,Sol, 2011. "Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521181969, September.
    3. Picciotto,Sol, 2011. "Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107005013, September.
    4. SINCLAIR, Amy & NOLAN, Justine, 2020. "Modern Slavery Laws in Australia: Steps in the Right Direction?," Business and Human Rights Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 164-170, January.
    5. Maria Gjølberg, 2010. "Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model”," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 203-229, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karin Buhmann, 2016. "Public Regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in Recent United Nations Instruments on Business and Human Rights and the Juridification of CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(4), pages 699-714, July.
    2. ., 2013. "The domestic politics of international tax cooperation in the United States and Switzerland," Chapters, in: The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance, chapter 5, pages 111-140, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Francesco Denozza, 2019. "Spettri del mitico ordo: diritto e mercato nel neoliberalismo (Ghosts of mytical ordo: Law and markets in neoliberalism)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 72(288), pages 327-348.
    4. Sol Picciotto, 2022. "Technocracy in the Era of Twitter: Between intergovernmentalism and supranational technocratic politics in global tax governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 634-652, July.
    5. Bedford Kate, 2020. "Law, Gender, and Development: Potent Hauntings," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 229-264, January.
    6. Richard Eccleston, 2013. "The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14033.
    7. Sorin-George Toma & Paul Marinescu & Ionut Constantin, 2016. "How the Ten Largest Corporations of the World Evolved in the Period 2014-2015," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 61-66, February.
    8. ., 2013. "Politics without conviction: the OECD’s failed Harmful Tax Competition initiative," Chapters, in: The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance, chapter 3, pages 60-80, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    9. Glenn Morgan, 2014. "Financialization and the multinational corporation," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 20(2), pages 183-197, May.
    10. Sol Picciotto, . "International tax, regulatory arbitrage and the growth of transnational corporations," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    11. Shaun Elder, 2014. "Does the GFC as a change agent of financial regulatory models and approaches in Europe provide lessons for Asia?," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 419-430, December.
    12. ., 2013. "The financial crisis and the politics of international tax cooperation," Chapters, in: The Dynamics of Global Economic Governance, chapter 4, pages 81-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Tusikov, Natasha, 2019. "How US-made rules shape internet governance in China," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22.
    14. Lips, Wouter, 2018. "Great powers in global tax governance: a comparison of the US role in the CRS and BEPS," SocArXiv ewd3j, Center for Open Science.
    15. José Carlos Marques, 2019. "Private regulatory capture via harmonization: An analysis of global retailer regulatory intermediaries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 157-176, June.
    16. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    17. Gabriela Gutierrez-Huerter O & Stefan Gold & Alexander Trautrims, 2023. "Change in Rhetoric but not in Action? Framing of the Ethical Issue of Modern Slavery in a UK Sector at High Risk of Labor Exploitation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(1), pages 35-58, January.
    18. Edward Wray-Bliss & Grant Michelson, 2022. "Modern Slavery and the Discursive Construction of a Propertied Freedom: Evidence from Australian Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 649-663, September.
    19. Scheper, Christian, 2022. "Multiplicity, the Corporation and Human Rights in Global Value Chains," SocArXiv 7azhk, Center for Open Science.
    20. Vlaskamp, Martijn C., 2024. "Exploring public support for extraterritorial jurisdiction over natural resource extraction: Survey insights from the United States," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:63:y:2023:i:5:p:1184-1198.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.