IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/hsgmrs/276051.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared Mobility: Wege aus der Nische?

Author

Listed:
  • Krämer, Andreas
  • Bongaerts, Robert

Abstract

Fast täglich wird über neue Mobilitätsanbieter berichtet, die auf Geschäftsmodelle der Sharing Economy aufsetzen. Obwohl Car-, Bike- und Ride-Sharing von der Grundidee viele Jahrzehnte alt sind, erhalten diese durch veränderte technologische, soziologische und wirtschaftliche Rahmenbedingungen eine neue Dynamik, teilweise mit dem Versprechen, die Zukunft der Mobilität komplett zu verändern und eine Verkehrswende zu erreichen. Allerdings ist die bisherige Akzeptanz bei den Verbrauchern eher gering. Um SharedMobility-Angebote aus der Nische zu befreien, sind neue Partnerschaften und/oder erweiterte Geschäfts- und Erlösmodelle erforderlich.

Suggested Citation

  • Krämer, Andreas & Bongaerts, Robert, 2019. "Shared Mobility: Wege aus der Nische?," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 36(4), pages 80-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmrs:276051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/276051/1/MRSG_2019_4_80-87.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Qin & Stephanie Lee & Xiangbin Yan & Yong Tan, 2018. "Beyond solving the last mile problem: the substitution effects of bike-sharing on a ride-sharing platform," Journal of Business Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 13-28, January.
    2. Cohen, Adam & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2018. "Planning for Shared Mobility," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0dk3h89p, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zgheib, Najib & Abou-Zeid, Maya & Kaysi, Isam, 2020. "Modeling demand for ridesourcing as feeder for high capacity mass transit systems with an application to the planned Beirut BRT," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 70-91.
    2. Chua, Alvin & Ow, Serene & Hsu, Kevin & Yazhe, Wang & Chirico, Michael & Zhongwen, Huang, 2020. "Distilling actionable insights from big travel demand datasets for city planning," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Pengfei Lin & Jiancheng Weng & Quan Liang & Dimitrios Alivanistos & Siyong Ma, 2020. "Impact of Weather Conditions and Built Environment on Public Bikesharing Trips in Beijing," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, March.
    4. Xin-Wei Li & Hong-Zhi Miao, 2023. "How to Incorporate Autonomous Vehicles into the Carbon Neutrality Framework of China: Legal and Policy Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Elnert Coenegrachts & Joris Beckers & Thierry Vanelslander & Ann Verhetsel, 2021. "Business Model Blueprints for the Shared Mobility Hub Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, June.
    6. Liu, Yixiao & Tian, Zihao & Pan, Baoran & Zhang, Wenbin & Liu, Yunqi & Tian, Lixin, 2022. "A hybrid big-data-based and tolerance-based method to estimate environmental benefits of electric bike sharing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    7. Xiaowei Chen & Hongyu Zheng & Ze Wang & Xiqun Chen, 2021. "Exploring impacts of on-demand ridesplitting on mobility via real-world ridesourcing data and questionnaires," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1541-1561, August.
    8. Ioannis Politis & Ioannis Fyrogenis & Efthymis Papadopoulos & Anastasia Nikolaidou & Eleni Verani, 2020. "Shifting to Shared Wheels: Factors Affecting Dockless Bike-Sharing Choice for Short and Long Trips," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, October.
    9. Feng, Xuan & Lin, Qinping & Jia, Ning & Tian, Junfang, 2024. "The actual impact of ride-splitting: An empirical study based on large-scale GPS data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 94-112.
    10. Shaheen, Susan & Farrar, Emily, 2022. "Vehicle Electrification in Carsharing and Transportation Network Company (TNC) Fleets: Current and Future Trends," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0gz5t8sw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    11. Dillon T. Fitch & Hossain Mohiuddin & Susan L. Handy, 2021. "Examining the Effects of the Sacramento Dockless E-Bike Share on Bicycling and Driving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, January.
    12. Loes M. Derikx & Dea van Lierop, 2021. "Intentions to Participate in Carsharing: The Role of Self- and Social Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, February.
    13. Jochem, Patrick & Frankenhauser, Dominik & Ewald, Lukas & Ensslen, Axel & Fromm, Hansjörg, 2020. "Does free-floating carsharing reduce private vehicle ownership? The case of SHARE NOW in European cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 373-395.
    14. Gong, Wenjing & Rui, Jin & Li, Tianyu, 2024. "Deciphering urban bike-sharing patterns: An in-depth analysis of natural environment and visual quality in New York's Citi bike system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Soltani, Ali & Allan, Andrew & Khalaj, Fahimeh & Pojani, Dorina & Mehdizadeh, Milad, 2021. "Ridesharing in Adelaide: Segmentation of users," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Guangnian Xiao & Zihao Wang, 2020. "Empirical Study on Bikesharing Brand Selection in China in the Post-Sharing Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Li, Chunzhi & Xiao, Wei & Zhang, Dayong & Ji, Qiang, 2021. "Low-carbon transformation of cities: Understanding the demand for dockless bike sharing in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Fei-Hui Huang, 2021. "User Behavioral Intentions toward a Scooter-Sharing Service: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Choi, Yunkyung & Guhathakurta, Subhrajit & Pande, Anurag, 2022. "An empirical Bayes approach to quantifying the impact of transportation network companies (TNCs) operations on travel demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 269-283.
    20. Shaheen, Susan & Darling, Wesley & Broader, Jacquelyn & Cohen, Adam, 2021. "Understanding Curb Management and Targeted Incentive Policies to Increase Transportation Network Company Pooling and Public Transit Linkages," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6gz9w0v9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmrs:276051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://imc.unisg.ch/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.