IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/hsgmrs/275896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welche Produkt­eigenschaften begeistern Kunden? - Eine Analyse von Online Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Müller, Steffen
  • Beinert, Markus
  • Struik, Arie

Abstract

Online Reviews stellen sowohl für Konsumenten als auch für Unternehmen eine wichtige Informationsquelle dar. Dieser Beitrag zeigt, wie Online Reviews in Unternehmen das Produktmanagement bzw. -Controlling unter-stützen können. Auf Basis von Online Reviews zu Smartphones werden Produkteigenschaften identifiziert, die Kunden begeistern.

Suggested Citation

  • Müller, Steffen & Beinert, Markus & Struik, Arie, 2017. "Welche Produkt­eigenschaften begeistern Kunden? - Eine Analyse von Online Reviews," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 34(1), pages 68-74.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmrs:275896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/275896/1/MRSG_2017_1_68-74.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Singh, Jyoti Prakash & Irani, Seda & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Saumya, Sunil & Kumar Roy, Pradeep, 2017. "Predicting the “helpfulness” of online consumer reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 346-355.
    2. Nikolay Archak & Anindya Ghose & Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis, 2011. "Deriving the Pricing Power of Product Features by Mining Consumer Reviews," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1485-1509, August.
    3. Decker, Reinhold & Trusov, Michael, 2010. "Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 293-307.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pei-Yu Chen & Yili Hong & Ying Liu, 2018. "The Value of Multidimensional Rating Systems: Evidence from a Natural Experiment and Randomized Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4629-4647, October.
    2. Xiao Liu & Param Vir Singh & Kannan Srinivasan, 2016. "A Structured Analysis of Unstructured Big Data by Leveraging Cloud Computing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 363-388, May.
    3. Roelen-Blasberg, Tobias & Habel, Johannes & Klarmann, Martin, 2023. "Automated inference of product attributes and their importance from user-generated content: Can we replace traditional market research?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 164-188.
    4. Oded Netzer & Ronen Feldman & Jacob Goldenberg & Moshe Fresko, 2012. "Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 521-543, May.
    5. Akshay Kangale & S. Krishna Kumar & Mohd Arshad Naeem & Mark Williams & M. K. Tiwari, 2016. "Mining consumer reviews to generate ratings of different product attributes while producing feature-based review-summary," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(13), pages 3272-3286, October.
    6. Dinesh Puranam & Vishal Narayan & Vrinda Kadiyali, 2017. "The Effect of Calorie Posting Regulation on Consumer Opinion: A Flexible Latent Dirichlet Allocation Model with Informative Priors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 726-746, September.
    7. Christoph Schneider & Markus Weinmann & Peter N.C. Mohr & Jan vom Brocke, 2021. "When the Stars Shine Too Bright: The Influence of Multidimensional Ratings on Online Consumer Ratings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3871-3898, June.
    8. Shugang Li & Yuqi Zhang & Yueming Li & Zhaoxu Yu, 2021. "The user preference identification for product improvement based on online comment patch," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 423-444, June.
    9. Anning Wang & Qiang Zhang & Shuangyao Zhao & Xiaonong Lu & Zhanglin Peng, 2020. "A review-driven customer preference measurement model for product improvement: sentiment-based importance–performance analysis," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 61-88, March.
    10. Yue Ma & Guoqing Chen & Qiang Wei, 2017. "Finding users preferences from large-scale online reviews for personalized recommendation," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 3-29, March.
    11. Moon, Sangkil & Kamakura, Wagner A., 2017. "A picture is worth a thousand words: Translating product reviews into a product positioning map," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 265-285.
    12. Daniel Kaimann & Joe Cox, 2014. "The Interaction of Signals: A Fuzzy set Analysis of the Video Game Industry," Working Papers Dissertations 13, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    13. Chen, Feier & Liu, Stephanie Q. & Mattila, Anna S., 2020. "Bragging and humblebragging in online reviews," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Daniel Kaimann & Joe Cox, 2014. "The Interaction of Signals: A Fuzzy set Analysis of the Video Game Industry," Working Papers CIE 84, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    15. Soumya Mukhopadhyay & V Kumar & Amalesh Sharma & Tuck Siong Chung, 2022. "Impact of review narrativity on sales in a competitive environment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2538-2556, June.
    16. Jorge Mejia & Shawn Mankad & Anandasivam Gopal, 2019. "A for Effort? Using the Crowd to Identify Moral Hazard in New York City Restaurant Hygiene Inspections," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1363-1386, December.
    17. Sheng, Jie & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "A multidisciplinary perspective of big data in management research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 97-112.
    18. Anindya Ghose & Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis & Beibei Li, 2012. "Designing Ranking Systems for Hotels on Travel Search Engines by Mining User-Generated and Crowdsourced Content," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 493-520, May.
    19. Joe Cox & Daniel Kaimann, 2013. "The Signaling Effect of Critics - Evidence from a Market for Experience Goods," Working Papers CIE 68, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
    20. Baxendale, Shane & Macdonald, Emma K. & Wilson, Hugh N., 2015. "The Impact of Different Touchpoints on Brand Consideration," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 235-253.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmrs:275896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://imc.unisg.ch/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.