IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/297288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land access and feeding strategies in post-Soviet livestock husbandry: Evidence from a rangeland system in Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Robinson, Sarah
  • Petrick, Martin

Abstract

CONTEXT: Feeding strategy is a major dimension of intensification and largely determines the environmental and economic impacts of livestock production systems, in particular concerning land use competition, greenhouse gas emissions and rural livelihoods. Literature suggests that a key driver of intensification is increasing population density – associated with decreased labor costs, shifts in demand and institutional and political change; whilst at the household level farmer education and market access are also important. However, the topic has not been addressed in the rangelands of post-Soviet Eurasia, where vast underused pasture resources may be reclaimed, but improved feeding is also a key aim of agricultural policy. OBJECTIVES: We aim to firstly describe the extent to which land users in an extensive rangeland system in Kazakhstan exploit pastures, arable land or markets to feed their animals, and secondly to explore the determinants of these decisions. METHODS: We identify three potential strategies: self-production of roughage or concentrate, purchase of these inputs, or expansion of pasture use through mobile pastoralism. We then investigate the determinants of these feeding strategies and their interactions, including variables capturing farm and farmer characteristics, access to land and other assets and outcomes of post-independence reforms. We examine the factors determining the three feeding strategies using a farm survey dataset from south-eastern Kazakhstan to estimate a simultaneous equation system, considering herd size as an endogenous variable. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Herd size combined with access to land for fodder production largely determines how producers feed their livestock. Barriers to the substitution of pasture for purchased or self-produced fodder include cropland access, distance from markets, and credit availability, so that use of remote and seasonal pastures is the major feeding strategy employed by larger producers. Access to both arable land and pasture is dependent on land reform outcomes, which constrain farmers' livestock feeding decisions today. Other factors such as farmer education, human population density and household labor are less important. SIGNIFICANCE: Grazing expansion strategies employed by farmers studied here differ from those based on external input use observed in many regions of the world. Instead, they reflect the continuing importance of pastoral resources in rangeland environments implying important trade-offs to intensification which merit further study.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson, Sarah & Petrick, Martin, 2024. "Land access and feeding strategies in post-Soviet livestock husbandry: Evidence from a rangeland system in Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 219.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:297288
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/297288/1/Robinson_2024_post_Soviet_livestock_husbandry.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kvartiuk, Vasyl & Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Liberal land reform in Kazakhstan? The effect on land rental and credit markets," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Petrick, Martin & Götz, Linde, 2019. "Herd growth, farm organisation and subsidies in the dairy sector of Russia and Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 70(3), pages 789-811.
    3. Matthew N. Hayek & Helen Harwatt & William J. Ripple & Nathaniel D. Mueller, 2021. "The carbon opportunity cost of animal-sourced food production on land," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(1), pages 21-24, January.
    4. Sandra Broka & Åsa Giertz & Garry Christensen & Debra Rasmussen & Alexei Morgounov & Turi Fileccia & Rhoda Rubaiza, 2016. "Kazakhstan Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 23763, The World Bank Group.
    5. Hankerson, Brett R. & Schierhorn, Florian & Prishchepov, Alexander V. & Dong, Changxing & Eisfelder, Christina & Müller, Daniel, 2019. "Modeling the spatial distribution of grazing intensity in Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27.
    6. repec:ucp:ecdecc:v:36:y:1987:i:1:p:73-99 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Carole Ferret, 2018. "Mobile pastoralism a century apart: continuity and change in south-eastern Kazakhstan, 1910 and 2012," Central Asian Survey, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 503-525, October.
    8. Sandra Broka & Åsa Giertz & Garry Christensen & Charity Hanif & Debra Rasmussen & Rhoda Rubaiza, 2016. "Kyrgyz Republic Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 23764, The World Bank Group.
    9. Christoph R. Weiss, 1999. "Farm Growth and Survival: Econometric Evidence for Individual Farms in Upper Austria," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(1), pages 103-116.
    10. Sandra Broka & Åsa Giertz & Garry Christensen & Charity Hanif & Debra Rasmussen, 2016. "Tajikistan Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment," World Bank Publications - Reports 23765, The World Bank Group.
    11. Kolluru, Venkatesh & John, Ranjeet & Saraf, Sakshi & Chen, Jiquan & Hankerson, Brett & Robinson, Sarah & Kussainova, Maira & Jain, Khushboo, 2023. "Gridded livestock density database and spatial trends for Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10, pages 1-15.
    12. Staal, S. J. & Baltenweck, I. & Waithaka, M. M. & deWolff, T. & Njoroge, L., 2002. "Location and uptake: integrated household and GIS analysis of technology adoption and land use, with application to smallholder dairy farms in Kenya," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 295-315, November.
    13. Robinson, Sarah & Bozayeva, Zhanyl & Mukhamedova, Nozilakhon & Djanibekov, Nodir & Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Ranchers or pastoralists? Farm size, specialisation and production strategy amongst cattle farmers in south-eastern Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11.
    14. David Roodman, 2011. "Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 11(2), pages 159-206, June.
    15. repec:ucp:ecdecc:v:57:y:2009:i:4:p:609-640 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robinson, Sarah & Bozayeva, Zhanyl & Mukhamedova, Nozilakhon & Djanibekov, Nodir & Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Ranchers or pastoralists? Farm size, specialisation and production strategy amongst cattle farmers in south-eastern Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11.
    2. Diego Marcelo Lara Haro & Luis Anderson Argothy Almeida & Juan Pablo Martínez Mesias & Marcelo Agustín Mejía Chávez, 2022. "El impacto de las crisis en el desempeno del sector agropecuario del Ecuador," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 14(1), pages 167-186, January.
    3. Thiermann, Insa & Breustedt, Gunnar & Rosenau, Carolin, 2019. "Einfluss der Größe auf die Aufgabe der Tierproduktion – empirische Analyse Milchvieh und Sauen haltender Betriebe in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(3), September.
    4. Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Post-Soviet agricultural restructuring: A success story after all?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 623-647.
    5. Hajdu, Anna & Gagalyuk, Taras & Bukin, Eduard & Petrick, Martin, 2021. "Determinants of corporate social responsibility among farms in Russia and Kazakhstan: a multilevel approach using survey data," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(4), May.
    6. Petrick, Martin & Götz, Linde, 2017. "The expansion of dairy herds in Russia and Kazakhstan after the import ban on Western food products," 57th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 13-15, 2017 261996, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    7. Teimuraz Gogokhia & George Berulava, 2021. "Business environment reforms, innovation and firm productivity in transition economies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(2), pages 221-245, June.
    8. Evan J. Miller-Tait & Sandeep Mohapatra & M. K. (Marty) Luckert & Brent M. Swallow, 2019. "Processing technologies for undervalued grains in rural India: on target to help the poor?," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(1), pages 151-166, February.
    9. Elias Giannakis & Sophia Efstratoglou & Artemis Antoniades, 2018. "Off-Farm Employment and Economic Crisis: Evidence from Cyprus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    10. Hajime Seya & Junyi Zhang & Makoto Chikaraishi & Ying Jiang, 2020. "Decisions on truck parking place and time on expressways: an analysis using digital tachograph data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 555-583, April.
    11. Catherine Sofer & Claire Thibout, 2019. "Women’s investment in career and the household division of labour," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(60), pages 6535-6557, December.
    12. Tocco, Barbara & Bailey, Alastair & Davidova, Sophia & Raimondi, Valentina, 2015. "Women and Part-Time Farming: Understanding Labor Supply Decisions in Italian Farm Households," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211932, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. David Roodman & James G. MacKinnon & Morten Ørregaard Nielsen & Matthew D. Webb, 2019. "Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 19(1), pages 4-60, March.
    14. Ellis, Jimmy R. & Gershenson, Seth, 2016. "LATE for the Meeting: Gender, Peer Advising, and College Success," IZA Discussion Papers 9956, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Maria Luisa Mancusi & Andrea Vezzulli & Serena Frazzoni & Zeno Rotondi & Maurizio Sobrero, 2018. "Export and Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises: The Role of Concentrated Bank Borrowing," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 85(337), pages 177-204, January.
    16. Saul Estrin & Julia Korosteleva & Tomasz Mickiewicz, 2022. "Schumpeterian Entry: Innovation, Exporting, and Growth Aspirations of Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(2), pages 269-296, March.
    17. Carrión-Flores, Carmen E. & Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso & Guci, Ledia, 2018. "An estimator for discrete-choice models with spatial lag dependence using large samples, with an application to land-use conversions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 77-93.
    18. Barış Alpaslan & Julide Yildirim, 2020. "The Missing Link: Are Individuals with More Social Capital in Better Health? Evidence from India," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 811-834, August.
    19. Lei Liu & Yue Xu & Zhaotian Yang & Ying Li, 2023. "The interrelationship between environmental NGO development and environmental condition in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8487-8516, August.
    20. Vimefall, Elin, 2015. "Income diversification and working children," Working Papers 2015:8, Örebro University, School of Business.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:297288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.