IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/263918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracia Digital

Author

Listed:
  • Berg, Sebastian
  • Hofmann, Jeanette

Abstract

Para las sociedades contemporáneas, la democracia digital constituye un concepto clave que denota, según nuestra comprensión, la relación entre autogobierno colectivo e infraestructuras digitales mediadoras. Las nuevas formas de involucramiento digital que van de la mano con reformas organizativas están reintermediando los entornos democráticos ya establecidos, y lo están haciendo de maneras abiertas que desafían las narrativas lineales de renovación o muerte. En un primer acercamiento, rastreamos la historia de la democracia digital en el contexto de sus constelaciones mediáticas específicas, mediante la descripción de las continuidades y discontinuidades en la interacción del cambio tecnológico y las aspiraciones a la democratización. A continuación, hacemos una revisión crítica de ciertas premisas teóricas sobre el papel de la tecnología y de cómo éstas varían en función de la manera en que se utiliza el concepto de democracia digital. En cuatro ámbitos, mostramos las condiciones políticas contingentes bajo las cuales evoluciona la relación entre las formas de autodeterminación democrática y sus infraestructuras digitales mediadoras. Una lección que puede aprenderse de estos cuatro ámbitos es que el autogobierno democrático es un proyecto profundamente mediado cuyas instituciones y prácticas están en constante flujo.

Suggested Citation

  • Berg, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2022. "Democracia Digital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Número Es, pages 1-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:263918
    DOI: 10.53857/EETI9698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/263918/1/Full-text-article-Berg-et-al-Democracia-digital.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.53857/EETI9698?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cardon, Dominique & Cardon, Christophe, 2007. "The Strength of Weak Cooperation:an Attempt to Understand the Meaning of Web 2.0," MPRA Paper 4581, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Haggart, Blayne & Iglesias Keller, Clara, 2021. "Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(6), pages 1-1.
    3. Berg, Sebastian & König, Tim & Koster, Ann-Kathrin, 2020. "Political Opinion Formation as Epistemic Practice: The Hashtag Assemblage of #metwo," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(4), pages 84-95.
    4. Haggart, Blayne & Keller, Clara Iglesias, 2021. "Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    5. Sebastian Berg & Tim König & Ann-Kathrin Koster, 2020. "Political Opinion Formation as Epistemic Practice: The Hashtag Assemblage of #metwo," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 84-95.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berg, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2021. "Digital democracy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23.
    2. Berg, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2021. "Digital democracy," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23.
    3. Isuru Koswatte & Chandrika Fernando, 2022. "Policy Development for Crisis Management in the Context of Sri Lanka," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 20(3 (Fall)), pages 295-327.
    4. Dvoskin, Brenda, 2023. "Expertise and Participation in the Facebook Oversight Board: From Reason to Will," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5).
    5. Hongyang He & Bin Zhang, 2022. "Effective Synergy of Market Agents: The Core of Achieving Multi-Agent Governance on the Internet Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Jesús C. Aguerri & Fernando Miró-Llinares & Ana B. Gómez-Bellvís, 2023. "Consensus on community guidelines: an experimental study on the legitimacy of content removal in social media," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Jean Samuel Beuscart & Kevin Mellet, 2008. "Business Models of the Web 2.0: Advertising or The Tale of Two Stories," Post-Print hal-03459866, HAL.
    8. Luisa Massari, 2010. "Analysis of MySpace user profiles," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 361-367, September.
    9. Kirsti Maria Ala-Mutka, 2009. "Review of Learning in ICT-enabled Networks and Communities," JRC Research Reports JRC52394, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Gorwa, Robert, 2024. "The Politics of Platform Regulation: How Governments Shape Online Content Moderation," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 299876, September.
    11. Emiliana De Blasio & Marianne Kneuer & Wolf Schünemann & Michele Sorice, 2020. "The Ongoing Transformation of the Digital Public Sphere: Basic Considerations on a Moving Target," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 1-5.
    12. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1u4ael0gba89u9tc82qa554gij is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Paris Chrysos, 2011. "An organisational design approach of business environments: the case of Barcamps milieu in Paris," Post-Print halshs-00796937, HAL.
    14. Dirk Ulrich Gilbert & Stephanie Schrage & Michael Behnam, 2024. "Advancing the Moral legitimacy of digital platforms as gatekeepers: a critical analysis from a political corporate social responsibility perspective," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 94(7), pages 1115-1145, October.
    15. Radu, Roxana & Kettemann, Matthias C. & Meyer, Trisha & Shahin, Jamal, 2021. "Normfare: Norm entrepreneurship in internet governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/1u4ael0gba89u9tc82qa554gij is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Heidebrecht, Sebastian, 2024. "Digital Policy and the Strengthened Role of the European Central Executive. An Introductory Overview," OSF Preprints kwrzg, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:263918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.