IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/econso/155851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resocialising and repoliticising financial markets: Contours of social studies of finance

Author

Listed:
  • de Goede, Marieke

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • de Goede, Marieke, 2005. "Resocialising and repoliticising financial markets: Contours of social studies of finance," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 6(3), pages 19-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:155851
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/155851/1/vol06-no03-a4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Beunza & David Stark, 2004. "Tools of the trade: the socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 13(2), pages 369-400, April.
    2. Callon, Michel, 2005. "Why virtualism paves the way to political impotence: A reply to Daniel Miller's critique of "The laws of the market"," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 6(2), pages 3-20.
    3. Underhill, Geoffrey R.D., 2001. "State, market, and global political economy: Genealogy of an (inter-?) discipline," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 2(3), pages 2-12.
    4. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226752136 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nelson, Julie A., 2012. "Poisoning the Well, or How Economic Theory Damages Moral Imagination," Working Papers 179107, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    2. Xifeng Wu & Yue Shen & Jin Chen & Yu Chen, 2023. "Social–financial approach for analyzing financial transitions," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philipp Heimberger & Jakob Kapeller, 2017. "The performativity of potential output: pro-cyclicality and path dependency in coordinating European fiscal policies," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5), pages 904-928, September.
    2. Konadu, Magneta & Kalthoff, Herbert, 2013. "The infrastructure of financial markets: The case of statistical information," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 14(3), pages 34-40.
    3. Liliana Doganova & Martin Giraudeau & Hans Kjellberg & Claes-Fredrik Helgesson & Francis Lee & Alexandre Mallard & Andrea Mennicken & Fabian Muniesa & Ebba Sjögren & Teun Zuiderent-Jerak, 2018. "Five years! Have we not had enough of valuation studies by now?," Post-Print halshs-01935355, HAL.
    4. Llerena Guiu Searle, 2014. "Conflict and Commensuration: Contested Market Making in India's Private Real Estate Development Sector," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 60-78, January.
    5. Kenneth Iain MacDonald & Catherine Corson, 2012. "‘TEEB Begins Now’: A Virtual Moment in the Production of Natural Capital," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 159-184, January.
    6. Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2011. "Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality's Éternel Retour," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 573-586, June.
    7. Kozaki, Tomomi & Nakamura, Yusuke, 2017. "The Evolving Life Improvement Approach: From Home Taylorism to JICA Tsukuba, and Beyond," Working Papers 146, JICA Research Institute.
    8. Mark J. Zbaracki & Mark Bergen, 2010. "When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 955-972, October.
    9. Timothy C. Johnson, 2012. "Ethics and Finance: the role of mathematics," Papers 1210.5390, arXiv.org.
    10. Millo, Yuval, 2007. "From green fields to green felt tables and back: the origin of index-based derivatives," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 36124, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Judy Wajcman, 2006. "New connections: social studies of science and technology and studies of work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 20(4), pages 773-786, December.
    12. McFall, Liz, 2014. "Devising Consumption: cultural economies of insurance, credit and spending," OSF Preprints at2nv, Center for Open Science.
    13. Ben R. Martin, 2016. "Twenty challenges for innovation studies," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 432-450.
    14. Braun, Benjamin, 2016. "Gross, greed, and ETFs: The case for a microfounded political economy of the investment chain," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(3), pages 6-13.
    15. Thinley Tharchen & Raghu Garud & Rebecca L. Henn, 2020. "Design as an interactive boundary object," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11664 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Beunza, Daniel & Stark, David, 2012. "From dissonance to resonance: cognitive interdependence in quantitative finance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45604, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Michel Callon & Fabian Muniesa, 2005. "Economic markets as calculative collective devices," Post-Print halshs-00087477, HAL.
    19. Isabelle Huault & Hélène Rainelli-Weiss, 2013. "Is transparency a value on OTC markets? Using displacement to escape categorization," Working Papers halshs-00927090, HAL.
    20. Williams, James W., 2013. "Regulatory technologies, risky subjects, and financial boundaries: Governing ‘fraud’ in the financial markets," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 544-558.
    21. Kenneth Amaeshi, 2010. "Different Markets for Different Folks: Exploring the Challenges of Mainstreaming Responsible Investment Practices," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 41-56, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:econso:155851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.