IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/igtrxx/v08y2006i03ns0219198906000941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compromising In Partition Function Form Games And Cooperation In Perfect Extensive Form Games

Author

Listed:
  • E. FUKUDA

    (Department of Value and Decision Science, Graduate School of Decision Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan)

  • S. H. TIJS

    (Center and Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Tilburg University, The Netherlands)

  • R. BRÂNZEI

    (Faculty of Computer Science, 'Alexandru Ioan Cuza' University, Iasi, Romania)

  • S. MUTO

    (Department of Value and Decision Science, Graduate School of Decision Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan)

Abstract

In this paper reasonable payoff intervals for players in a game in partition function form (p.f.f. game) are introduced and used to define the notion of compromisable p.f.f. game. For a compromisable p.f.f. game a compromise value is defined for which an axiomatic characterization is provided. Also a generic subclass of games in extensive form of perfect information without chance moves is introduced. For this class of perfect extensive form games there is a natural credible way to define a p.f.f. game if the players consider cooperation. It turns out that the p.f.f. games obtained in this way are compromisable.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Fukuda & S. H. Tijs & R. Brânzei & S. Muto, 2006. "Compromising In Partition Function Form Games And Cooperation In Perfect Extensive Form Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 329-338.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:08:y:2006:i:03:n:s0219198906000941
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219198906000941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219198906000941
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219198906000941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Branzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2004. "Hypercubes and compromise values for cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 733-740, June.
    2. Kim Hang Pham Do & Henk Norde, 2007. "The Shapley Value For Partition Function Form Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 353-360.
    3. Pham Do, K.H., 2003. "Essays in game theory and natural resource management," Other publications TiSEM 2ee68845-0f06-484b-bd17-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fukuda, E. & Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Muto, S., 2002. "Compromising in Partition Function Form Games and Cooperation in Perfect Extensive Form," Other publications TiSEM 9374032a-efac-43dd-a3db-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Fukuda, E. & Tijs, S.H. & Brânzei, R. & Muto, S., 2002. "Compromising in Partition Function Form Games and Cooperation in Perfect Extensive Form," Discussion Paper 2002-117, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    3. Rooderkerk, R.P., 2007. "Optimizing product lines and assortments," Other publications TiSEM fa544b38-604e-410b-a5da-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Dutta, Bhaskar & Ehlers, Lars & Kar, Anirban, 2010. "Externalities, potential, value and consistency," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(6), pages 2380-2411, November.
    5. Yuan Ju, 2007. "The Consensus Value For Games In Partition Function Form," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(03), pages 437-452.
    6. Ander Perez-Orive & Andrea Caggese, 2017. "Capital Misallocation and Secular Stagnation," 2017 Meeting Papers 382, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    7. Takaaki Abe, 2020. "Population monotonic allocation schemes for games with externalities," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(1), pages 97-117, March.
    8. Bellemare, C., 2004. "Microeconometric essays on migration, trust and Satisfaction," Other publications TiSEM e1e9cd8e-64ac-45df-9611-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Branzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2004. "Egalitarianism in convex fuzzy games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 313-325, May.
    10. Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo & David Wettstein, 2010. "Dividends and weighted values in games with externalities," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 39(1), pages 177-184, March.
    11. Geoffroy de Clippel & Roberto Serrano, 2008. "Marginal Contributions and Externalities in the Value," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(6), pages 1413-1436, November.
    12. McQuillin, Ben, 2009. "The extended and generalized Shapley value: Simultaneous consideration of coalitional externalities and coalitional structure," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 696-721, March.
    13. Sokolov, Denis, 2022. "Shapley value for TU-games with multiple memberships and externalities," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 76-90.
    14. M. Álvarez-Mozos & O. Tejada, 2015. "The Banzhaf value in the presence of externalities," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(4), pages 781-805, April.
    15. Do, Kim Hang Pham & Folmer, Henk, 2004. "Regional Fishery Management Organization as Games in Coalitional Form," 2004 Conference, June 25-26, 2004, Blenheim, New Zealand 97792, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Yuan Ju & David Wettstein, 2009. "Implementing cooperative solution concepts: a generalized bidding approach," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 39(2), pages 307-330, May.
    17. Yuan Ju & Peter Borm, 2006. "A Non-cooperative Approach to the Compensation Rules for Primeval Games," Keele Economics Research Papers KERP 2006/18, Centre for Economic Research, Keele University.
    18. Li, Deng-Feng, 2012. "A fast approach to compute fuzzy values of matrix games with payoffs of triangular fuzzy numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 421-429.
    19. Ju, Yuan & Borm, Peter, 2008. "Externalities and compensation: Primeval games and solutions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3-4), pages 367-382, February.
    20. J. M. Alonso-Meijide & M. Álvarez-Mozos & M. G. Fiestras-Janeiro & A. Jiménez-Losada, 2021. "Marginality and convexity in partition function form games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 94(1), pages 99-121, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Partition function form games; compromise value; comprisable games; extensive form games (with perfect information);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
    • D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:08:y:2006:i:03:n:s0219198906000941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/igtr/igtr.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.