IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v28y2020i6p1738-1754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Achieving transient competitive advantage in high‐speed rail projects bidding: Sustainable development perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Na Zhang
  • Bon‐gang Hwang
  • Xiaopeng Deng
  • Yan Ning

Abstract

Since there is fierce competition in the global high‐speed rail (HSR) market, pursuing sustainable development has become an essential task for HSR firms. However, competition on the international HSR projects shows prominent dynamic characteristics, which pose severe challenges to the sustainable development of HSR firms. Transient competitive advantage (TrCA) as a kind of advantage, that can be built quickly and abandoned rapidly, would guide HSR firms winning awards and survival in the dynamic competitive environment. To explore how HSR project bidders achieve their TrCA in the bidding process, this study conducted a multicases approach. We have collected the data by using the query‐based website crawler as well as focus group discussion. First, the main strategic activities were identified while their sources and roles were discussed in the context of TrCA theory. Then, a conceptual framework was developed to reveal the improvement of TrCA. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that proposes conceptual framework for TrCA improvement. Implications related to the findings are proposed to understand the formation and improvement of TrCA further. The results provide a comprehensive guidance for HSR project bid managers, market players, and future market entrants adopting main strategic activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Na Zhang & Bon‐gang Hwang & Xiaopeng Deng & Yan Ning, 2020. "Achieving transient competitive advantage in high‐speed rail projects bidding: Sustainable development perspective," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1738-1754, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:28:y:2020:i:6:p:1738-1754
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2121
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric L. Chen & Riitta Katila & Rory McDonald & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2010. "Life in the fast lane: Origins of competitive interaction in new vs. established markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1527-1547, December.
    2. Richard A. D'Aveni & Giovanni Battista Dagnino & Ken G. Smith, 2010. "The age of temporary advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(13), pages 1371-1385, December.
    3. Ohsung Kwon, 2020. "A study on how startups approach sustainable development through intellectual property," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 613-625, July.
    4. Wai Wai Ko & Gordon Liu, 2017. "Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage: The Role of Small‐ and Medium‐Sized enterprises' Dynamic Capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 584-596, July.
    5. Jasanta PERANGINANGIN, 2015. "A Conceptual Mapping Resource Advantage Theory, Competitive Advantage Theory, and Transient Competitive Advantage," Expert Journal of Business and Management, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(2), pages 140-149.
    6. Maury, Benjamin, 2018. "Sustainable competitive advantage and profitability persistence: Sources versus outcomes for assessing advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 100-113.
    7. Jean D. Kabongo & Olivier Boiral, 2017. "Doing More with Less: Building Dynamic Capabilities for Eco‐Efficiency," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 956-971, November.
    8. Owais Khan & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2020. "Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities: Insights from circular economy business cases," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1479-1493, March.
    9. René Bohnsack & Ans Kolk & Jonatan Pinkse & Christina M. Bidmon, 2020. "Driving the electric bandwagon: The dynamics of incumbents' sustainable innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 727-743, February.
    10. Agus Kaharuddin & Agung Wahyu Handaru & Wahyudi Sardan & Hayder Alhadey Ahmad Mohammed, 2017. "Transient competitive advantage readiness: findings from hotels, cafés, and fashion retails in Bandung, Indonesia," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3), pages 417-427.
    11. Feng Yu & Faqin Lin & Yihong Tang & Changbiao Zhong, 2019. "High‐speed railway to success? The effects of high‐speed rail connection on regional economic development in China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 723-742, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin, Shuai & Jia, Limin & Zhang, Hengrun & Zhang, Pengzhu, 2022. "Reliability of high-speed electric multiple units in terms of the expanded multi-state flow network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Hofer & Jordan M. Barker & Laura D'Oria & Jonathan L. Johnson, 2022. "Broadening our understanding of interfirm rivalry: A call for research on how supply networks shape competitive behavior and performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 58(2), pages 8-25, April.
    2. Pelin Demirel & Effie Kesidou, 2019. "Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 847-857, July.
    3. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Doina Popescu & Olguta Anca Orzan, 2020. "Eco-innovation Capability and Sustainability Driven Innovation Practices in Romanian SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Roberta De Angelis & Robert Morgan & Luigi M. De Luca, 2023. "Open strategy and dynamic capabilities: A framework for circular economy business models research," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4861-4873, November.
    5. Owais Khan & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2020. "The role of dynamic capabilities in circular economy implementation and performance of companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 3018-3033, November.
    6. Wilde, Kerstin & Hermans, Frans, 2021. "Innovation in the bioeconomy: Perspectives of entrepreneurs on relevant framework conditions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 314.
    7. Nayak, Bishwajit & Bhattacharyya, Som Sekhar & Krishnamoorthy, Bala, 2022. "Exploring the black box of competitive advantage – An integrated bibliometric and chronological literature review approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 964-982.
    8. Patrick Elf & Andrea Werner & Sandy Black, 2022. "Advancing the circular economy through dynamic capabilities and extended customer engagement: Insights from small sustainable fashion enterprises in the UK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2682-2699, September.
    9. Kristoffersen, Eivind & Mikalef, Patrick & Blomsma, Fenna & Li, Jingyue, 2021. "The effects of business analytics capability on circular economy implementation, resource orchestration capability, and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    10. Dmitry Sharapov & Jan‐Michael Ross, 2023. "Whom should a leader imitate? Using rivalry‐based imitation to manage strategic risk in changing environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 311-342, January.
    11. Mary Beth Rousseau & Blake D. Mathias & Laura T. Madden & T. Russell Crook, 2016. "Innovation, Firm Performance, And Appropriation: A Meta-Analysis," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-29, April.
    12. Bomi Song & Donghyun Choi, 2018. "Dynamic Capability of the Firm as Driver of Green Supply Chain Management Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Arpita Chari & Denis Niedenzu & Mélanie Despeisse & Carla Gonçalves Machado & João Domingues Azevedo & Rui Boavida‐Dias & Björn Johansson, 2022. "Dynamic capabilities for circular manufacturing supply chains—Exploring the role of Industry 4.0 and resilience," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2500-2517, July.
    14. Yuan, Lin & Pangarkar, Nitin & Wu, Jie, 2016. "The interactive effect of time and host country location on Chinese MNCs’ performance: An empirical investigation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 331-342.
    15. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    16. Eren Durmus Ozdemir & Saime Mecikoglu, 2016. "A Case Study on Performance Implications of Hybrid Strategy in Automotive Supplier Industry," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 31-43, June.
    17. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    18. Baek, Jisun & Park, WooRam, 2022. "The impact of improved passenger transport system on manufacturing plant productivity," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Chen, Qifei & Wang, Meng, 2022. "Opening of high-speed rail and the consumer service industry: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 31-45.
    20. Radovan Savov & Drahoslav Lančarič & Jana Kozáková, 2020. "Size of the Company as the Main Determinant of Talent Management in Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:28:y:2020:i:6:p:1738-1754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.