IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v37y2017i4p677-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Exposure Assessment of Campylobacter in Ontario, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Katarina D.M. Pintar
  • Kate M. Thomas
  • Tanya Christidis
  • Ainsley Otten
  • Andrea Nesbitt
  • Barbara Marshall
  • Frank Pollari
  • Matt Hurst
  • Andre Ravel

Abstract

To inform source attribution efforts, a comparative exposure assessment was developed to estimate the relative exposure to Campylobacter, the leading bacterial gastrointestinal disease in Canada, for 13 different transmission routes within Ontario, Canada, during the summer. Exposure was quantified with stochastic models at the population level, which incorporated measures of frequency, quantity ingested, prevalence, and concentration, using data from FoodNet Canada surveillance, the peer‐reviewed and gray literature, other Ontario data, and data that were specifically collected for this study. Models were run with @Risk software using Monte Carlo simulations. The mean number of cells of Campylobacter ingested per Ontarian per day during the summer, ranked from highest to lowest is as follows: household pets, chicken, living on a farm, raw milk, visiting a farm, recreational water, beef, drinking water, pork, vegetables, seafood, petting zoos, and fruits. The study results identify knowledge gaps for some transmission routes, and indicate that some transmission routes for Campylobacter are underestimated in the current literature, such as household pets and raw milk. Many data gaps were identified for future data collection consideration, especially for the concentration of Campylobacter in all transmission routes.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarina D.M. Pintar & Kate M. Thomas & Tanya Christidis & Ainsley Otten & Andrea Nesbitt & Barbara Marshall & Frank Pollari & Matt Hurst & Andre Ravel, 2017. "A Comparative Exposure Assessment of Campylobacter in Ontario, Canada," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 677-715, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:4:p:677-715
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12653
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarina D M Pintar & Tanya Christidis & M Kate Thomas & Maureen Anderson & Andrea Nesbitt & Jessica Keithlin & Barbara Marshall & Frank Pollari, 2015. "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Campylobacter spp. Prevalence and Concentration in Household Pets and Petting Zoo Animals for Use in Exposure Assessments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Robin J. Lake & Peter J. Cressey & Donald M. Campbell & Elisabeth Oakley, 2010. "Risk Ranking for Foodborne Microbial Hazards in New Zealand: Burden of Disease Estimates," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 743-752, May.
    3. Hoffmann, Sandra A. & Fischbeck, Paul S. & Krupnick, Alan J. & McWilliams, Michael, 2006. "Eliciting Information on Uncertainty from Heterogeneous Expert Panels: Attributing U.S. Foodborne Pathogen Illness to Food Consumption," Discussion Papers 10444, Resources for the Future.
    4. Jukka Ranta & Dmitri Matjushin & Terhi Virtanen & Markku Kuusi & Hildegunn Viljugrein & Merete Hofshagen & Marjaana Hakkinen, 2011. "Bayesian Temporal Source Attribution of Foodborne Zoonoses: Campylobacter in Finland and Norway," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(7), pages 1156-1171, July.
    5. Eric G. Evers & Petra A. Berk & Mijke L. Horneman & Frans M. van Leusden & Rob de Jonge, 2014. "A Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment for Campylobacter in Petting Zoos," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(9), pages 1618-1638, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yawson, Robert M. & Kuzma, Jennifer, 2010. "Evidence review and experts’ opinion on consumer acceptance of agrifood nanotechnology," MPRA Paper 40807, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Hoffman, Sandra & Ashton, Lydia & Todd, Jessica E & Ahn, Jae-Wan & Berck, Peter, 2021. "Attributing U.S. Campylobacteriosis Cases to Food Sources, Season, and Temperature," Economic Research Report 327200, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Karin Hoelzer & Haley F. Oliver & Larry R. Kohl & Jill Hollingsworth & Martin T. Wells & Martin Wiedmann, 2012. "Structured Expert Elicitation About Listeria monocytogenes Cross‐Contamination in the Environment of Retail Deli Operations in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(7), pages 1139-1156, July.
    4. B. Chapman & K. Pintar & B. A. Smith, 2018. "Multi‐Exposure Pathway Model to Compare Escherichia coli O157 Risks and Interventions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 392-409, February.
    5. S. Fiona Barker, 2014. "Risk of Norovirus Gastroenteritis from Consumption of Vegetables Irrigated with Highly Treated Municipal Wastewater—Evaluation of Methods to Estimate Sewage Quality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 803-817, May.
    6. Kathleen Manipis & Brendan Mulhern & Philip Haywood & Rosalie Viney & Stephen Goodall, 2023. "Estimating the willingness-to-pay to avoid the consequences of foodborne illnesses: a discrete choice experiment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(5), pages 831-852, July.
    7. Steven Duret & Hong‐Minh Hoang & Evelyne Derens‐Bertheau & Anthony Delahaye & Onrawee Laguerre & Laurent Guillier, 2019. "Combining Quantitative Risk Assessment of Human Health, Food Waste, and Energy Consumption: The Next Step in the Development of the Food Cold Chain?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(4), pages 906-925, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:37:y:2017:i:4:p:677-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.