IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v29y2009i2p257-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Etiological Agent and Bather Shedding of Pathogens on Interpretation of Epidemiological Data Used to Establish Recreational Water Quality Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Frank J. Loge
  • Elisabetta Lambertini
  • Mark A. Borchardt
  • Hakan Başağaoğlu
  • Timothy R. Ginn

Abstract

The overall goal of the study reported herein was to use techniques in the field of risk assessment (specifically a state‐space population dynamic model of disease transmission within recreational waters) to explore the relative significance of (1) active shedding of microorganisms from bathers themselves, and (2) the type and concentration of etiological agent on the observed heterogeneity of the incidence of illness in epidemiological studies that have been used to develop ambient water quality criteria. The etiological agent and corresponding dose ingested during recreational contact was found to significantly impact the observed incidence of illness in an epidemiological study conducted in recreational water. In addition, the observed incidence of illness was found not to necessarily reflect background concentrations of indicator organisms, but rather microorganisms shed during recreational contact. Future revisions to ambient water quality criteria should address the etiological agent, dose, and the significance of microbial shedding relative to background concentrations of pathogens and indicator organisms in addition to the incidence of illness and concentration of indicator organisms. Without a quantitative assessment of these additional variables, study findings may potentially be site specific and not representative of the health risks associated with specific indicator concentrations in all recreational waters.

Suggested Citation

  • Frank J. Loge & Elisabetta Lambertini & Mark A. Borchardt & Hakan Başağaoğlu & Timothy R. Ginn, 2009. "Effects of Etiological Agent and Bather Shedding of Pathogens on Interpretation of Epidemiological Data Used to Establish Recreational Water Quality Standards," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 257-266, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:2:p:257-266
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01184.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01184.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01184.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rose, J.B. & Haas, C.N. & Regli, S., 1991. "Risk assessment and control of waterborne giardiasis," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(6), pages 709-713.
    2. Joseph N. Eisenberg & Edmund Y. W. Seto & Adam W. Olivieri & Robert C. Spear, 1996. "Quantifying Water Pathogen Risk in an Epidemiological Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 549-563, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Greenberg & Charles Haas & Anthony Cox & Karen Lowrie & Katherine McComas & Warner North, 2012. "Ten Most Important Accomplishments in Risk Analysis, 1980–2010," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(5), pages 771-781, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles N. Haas, 2002. "On the Risk of Mortality to Primates Exposed to Anthrax Spores," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(2), pages 189-193, April.
    2. Charles N. Haas, 2002. "Conditional Dose‐Response Relationships for Microorganisms: Development and Application," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 455-463, June.
    3. Miao Guo & Abhinav Mishra & Robert L. Buchanan & Jitender P. Dubey & Dolores E. Hill & H. Ray Gamble & Jeffrey L. Jones & Xianzhi Du & Abani K. Pradhan, 2016. "Development of Dose‐Response Models to Predict the Relationship for Human Toxoplasma gondii Infection Associated with Meat Consumption," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(5), pages 926-938, May.
    4. Philip J. Schmidt & Katarina D. M. Pintar & Aamir M. Fazil & Edward Topp, 2013. "Harnessing the Theoretical Foundations of the Exponential and Beta‐Poisson Dose‐Response Models to Quantify Parameter Uncertainty Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(9), pages 1677-1693, September.
    5. Régis Pouillot & Véronique Goulet & Marie Laure Delignette‐Muller & Aurélie Mahé & Marie Cornu, 2009. "Quantitative Risk Assessment of Listeria monocytogenes in French Cold‐Smoked Salmon: II. Risk Characterization," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 806-819, June.
    6. Thu Le-Thi & Phuc Pham-Duc & Christian Zurbrügg & Toan Luu-Quoc & Huong Nguyen-Mai & Tu Vu-Van & Hung Nguyen-Viet, 2017. "Diarrhea risks by exposure to livestock waste in Vietnam using quantitative microbial risk assessment," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(1), pages 83-91, February.
    7. Margaret Donald & Angus Cook & Kerrie Mengersen, 2009. "Bayesian Network for Risk of Diarrhea Associated with the Use of Recycled Water," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(12), pages 1672-1685, December.
    8. Tucker Burch, 2019. "Validation of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Using Epidemiological Data from Outbreaks of Waterborne Gastrointestinal Disease," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 599-615, March.
    9. Duncan A. Robertson, 2019. "Spatial Transmission Models: A Taxonomy and Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 225-243, January.
    10. David L. Holcomb & Mary A. Smith & Glenn O. Ware & Yen‐Con Hung & Robert E. Brackett & Michael P. Doyle, 1999. "Comparison of Six Dose‐Response Models for Use with Food‐Borne Pathogens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(6), pages 1091-1100, December.
    11. Walter Dowdle & Harrie Van Der Avoort & Esther De Gourville & Francis Delpeyroux & Jagadish Desphande & Tapani Hovi & Javier Martin & Mark Pallansch & Olen Kew & Chris Wolff, 2006. "Containment of Polioviruses After Eradication and OPV Cessation: Characterizing Risks to Improve Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1449-1469, December.
    12. S. R. Petterson, 2016. "Application of a QMRA Framework to Inform Selection of Drinking Water Interventions in the Developing Context," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 203-214, February.
    13. Joseph N. S. Eisenberg & Jeffrey A. Soller & James Scott & Don M. Eisenberg & John M. Colford, 2004. "A Dynamic Model to Assess Microbial Health Risks Associated with Beneficial Uses of Biosolids," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 221-236, February.
    14. Joseph N. Eisenberg & Edmund Y. W. Seto & Adam W. Olivieri & Robert C. Spear, 1996. "Quantifying Water Pathogen Risk in an Epidemiological Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 549-563, August.
    15. Tucker R. Burch, 2020. "Outbreak‐Based Giardia Dose–Response Model Using Bayesian Hierarchical Markov Chain Monte Carlo Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 705-722, April.
    16. Charles N. Haas, 2002. "The Role of Risk Analysis in Understanding Bioterrorism," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 671-677, August.
    17. Randy L. Maddalena & Thomas E. McKone & Michael D. Sohn, 2004. "Standardized Approach for Developing Probabilistic Exposure Factor Distributions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 1185-1199, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:2:p:257-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.