IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v13y1993i4p441-447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Radon Testing Behavior in a Sample of Individuals with High Home Radon Screening Measurements

Author

Listed:
  • R. William Field
  • Burton C. Kross
  • La Verle J. Vust

Abstract

Although radon exposure has been identified as the second leading cause of lung cancer, fewer than 6% of U.S. homeowners test their homes for radon. This report examines participants’follow‐up radon testing behavior subsequent to receiving an initial screening radon level greater than 20 pCi/L. Sixty‐two participants in the Iowa State‐Wide Rural Radon Screening Survey who had radon screening measurements over 20 pCi/L were questioned by phone survey 3 months after receipt of their radon screening result to assess: whether participants were aware of radon's health risk; if participants recalled the radon screening results; how participants perceived the relative health risk of radon and whether participants planned follow‐up radon testing. Only 19% of the respondents specifically identified lung cancer as the possible adverse health outcome of high radon exposure, and the majority of participants underestimated the health risks high radon levels pose when compared to cigarettes and x‐rays. In addition, less than one third (29%)of the participants actually remembered their radon screening level within 10 pCi/L 3 months after receiving their screening results. Only 53% of the individuals correctly interpreted their screening radon level as being in the high range, and only 39% of the participants planned follow‐up radon measurements. Receipt of radon screening test results indicating high radon levels was not an adequate motivational factor in itself to stimulate further radon assessment or mitigation. Our findings suggest that free radon screening will not result in a dramatic increase in subsequent homeowner initiated remediation or further recommended radon testing.

Suggested Citation

  • R. William Field & Burton C. Kross & La Verle J. Vust, 1993. "Radon Testing Behavior in a Sample of Individuals with High Home Radon Screening Measurements," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 441-447, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:13:y:1993:i:4:p:441-447
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00744.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00744.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00744.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James K. Doyle & Gary H. McClelland & William D. Schulze & Steven R. Elliott & Glenn W. Russell, 1991. "Protective Responses to Household Risk: A Case Study of Radon Mitigation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 121-134, March.
    2. Field, R.W. & Kross, B.C., 1990. "Field comparison of several commercially available radon detectors," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 80(8), pages 926-930.
    3. Weinstein, N.D. & Klotz, M.L. & Sandman, P.M., 1988. "Optimistic biases in public perceptions of the risk from radon," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 78(7), pages 796-800.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabien Gagnon & Mathieu Courchesne & Benoît Lévesque & Pierre Ayotte & Jean‐Marc Leclerc & Jean‐Claude Belles‐Isles & Claude Prévost & Jean‐Claude Dessau, 2008. "Assessment of the Effectiveness of Radon Screening Programs in Reducing Lung Cancer Mortality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1221-1230, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neil D. Weinstein & Nancy E. Roberts & Kerry Kirk Pflugh, 1992. "Evaluating Personalized Risk Messages," Evaluation Review, , vol. 16(3), pages 235-246, June.
    2. Lennart Sjöberg, 1998. "Worry and Risk Perception," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 85-93, February.
    3. Kathleen McColl & Marion Debin & Cecile Souty & Caroline Guerrisi & Clement Turbelin & Alessandra Falchi & Isabelle Bonmarin & Daniela Paolotti & Chinelo Obi & Jim Duggan & Yamir Moreno & Ania Wisniak, 2021. "Are People Optimistically Biased about the Risk of COVID-19 Infection? Lessons from the First Wave of the Pandemic in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Naira Hakobyan & Anna Khachatryan, 2018. "Structure of Person’s Psychological Resources in Emergency Situations," Proceedings of the 9th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, April 4-5, 2018 012, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    5. Wouter Poortinga & Karin Bronstering & Simon Lannon, 2011. "Awareness and Perceptions of the Risks of Exposure to Indoor Radon: A Population‐Based Approach to Evaluate a Radon Awareness and Testing Campaign in England and Wales," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(11), pages 1800-1812, November.
    6. Liliana Cori & Olivia Curzio & Gabriele Donzelli & Elisa Bustaffa & Fabrizio Bianchi, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Radon Risk Perception, Awareness, and Knowledge: Risk Communication Options," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Zhengyan Li & David M. Konisky, 2023. "Personal attributes and (mis)perceptions of local environmental risk," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(1), pages 119-152, January.
    8. Amanda J. Dillard & Mick P. Couper & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, 2010. "Perceived Risk of Cancer and Patient Reports of Participation in Decisions about Screening: The DECISIONS Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(5_suppl), pages 96-105, September.
    9. Sarah E. Hampson & Judy A. Andrews & Michael E. Lee & Lyn S. Foster & Russell E. Glasgow & Edward Liechtenstein, 1998. "Lay Understanding of Synergistic Risk: The Case of Radon and Cigarette Smoking," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 343-350, June.
    10. Lugg, Andrew & Probert, Douglas, 1997. "Indoor radon gas: A potential health hazard resulting from implementing energy-efficiency measures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 93-196, February.
    11. Fabien Gagnon & Mathieu Courchesne & Benoît Lévesque & Pierre Ayotte & Jean‐Marc Leclerc & Jean‐Claude Belles‐Isles & Claude Prévost & Jean‐Claude Dessau, 2008. "Assessment of the Effectiveness of Radon Screening Programs in Reducing Lung Cancer Mortality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1221-1230, October.
    12. Anna Laura Huckelba & Paul A. M. Van Lange, 2020. "The Silent Killer: Consequences of Climate Change and How to Survive Past the Year 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Dennis J. Mazur & David H. Hickam, 1993. "Patients' and Physicians' Interpretations of Graphic Data Displays," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 13(1), pages 59-63, February.
    14. Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Mălina Petrescu-Mag, 2017. "Setting the Scene for a Healthier Indoor Living Environment: Citizens’ Knowledge, Awareness, and Habits Related to Residential Radon Exposure in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:13:y:1993:i:4:p:441-447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.