IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v28y2008i5p1221-1230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Radon Screening Programs in Reducing Lung Cancer Mortality

Author

Listed:
  • Fabien Gagnon
  • Mathieu Courchesne
  • Benoît Lévesque
  • Pierre Ayotte
  • Jean‐Marc Leclerc
  • Jean‐Claude Belles‐Isles
  • Claude Prévost
  • Jean‐Claude Dessau

Abstract

The present study was aimed at assessing the health consequences of the presence of radon in Quebec homes and the possible impact of various screening programs on lung cancer mortality. Lung cancer risk due to this radioactive gas was estimated according to the cancer risk model developed by the Sixth Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations. Objective data on residential radon exposure, population mobility, and tobacco use in the study population were integrated into a Monte‐Carlo‐type model. Participation rates to radon screening programs were estimated from published data. According to the model used, approximately 10% of deaths due to lung cancer are attributable to residential radon exposure on a yearly basis in Quebec. In the long term, the promotion of a universal screening program would prevent less than one death/year on a province‐wide scale (0.8 case; IC 99%: –3.6 to 5.2 cases/year), for an overall reduction of 0.19% in radon‐related mortality. Reductions in mortality due to radon by (1) the implementation of a targeted screening program in the region with the highest concentrations, (2) the promotion of screening on a local basis with financial support, or (3) the realization of systematic investigations in primary and secondary schools would increase to 1%, 14%, and 16.4%, respectively, in the each of the populations targeted by these scenarios. Other than the battle against tobacco use, radon screening in public buildings thus currently appears as the most promising screening policy for reducing radon‐related lung cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabien Gagnon & Mathieu Courchesne & Benoît Lévesque & Pierre Ayotte & Jean‐Marc Leclerc & Jean‐Claude Belles‐Isles & Claude Prévost & Jean‐Claude Dessau, 2008. "Assessment of the Effectiveness of Radon Screening Programs in Reducing Lung Cancer Mortality," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1221-1230, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:28:y:2008:i:5:p:1221-1230
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01105.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01105.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01105.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James K. Doyle & Gary H. McClelland & William D. Schulze & Steven R. Elliott & Glenn W. Russell, 1991. "Protective Responses to Household Risk: A Case Study of Radon Mitigation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 121-134, March.
    2. R. William Field & Burton C. Kross & La Verle J. Vust, 1993. "Radon Testing Behavior in a Sample of Individuals with High Home Radon Screening Measurements," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 441-447, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neil D. Weinstein & Nancy E. Roberts & Kerry Kirk Pflugh, 1992. "Evaluating Personalized Risk Messages," Evaluation Review, , vol. 16(3), pages 235-246, June.
    2. R. William Field & Burton C. Kross & La Verle J. Vust, 1993. "Radon Testing Behavior in a Sample of Individuals with High Home Radon Screening Measurements," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 441-447, August.
    3. Lugg, Andrew & Probert, Douglas, 1997. "Indoor radon gas: A potential health hazard resulting from implementing energy-efficiency measures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 93-196, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:28:y:2008:i:5:p:1221-1230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.