IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v12y1992i1p105-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carcinogenic Mixtures

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Krewski
  • Richard D. Thomas

Abstract

Human populations are generally exposed simultaneously to a number of toxicants present in the environment, including complex mixtures of unknown and variable origin. While scientific methods for evaluating the potential carcinogenic risks of pure compounds are relatively well established, methods for assessing the risks of complex mixtures are somewhat less developed. This article provides a report of a recent workshop on carcinogenic mixtures sponsored by the Committee on Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, in which toxicological, epidemiological, and statistical approaches to carcinogenic risk assessment for mixtures were discussed. Complex mixtures, such as diesel emissions and tobacco smoke, have been shown to have carcinogenic potential. Bioassay‐directed fractionation based on short‐term screening tests for genotoxicity has also been used in identifying carcinogenic components of mixtures. Both toxicological and epidemiological studies have identified clear interactions between chemical carcinogens, including synergistic effects at moderate to high doses. To date, laboratory studies have demonstrated over 900 interactions involving nearly 200 chemical carcinogens. At lower doses, theoretical arguments suggest that risks may be near additive. Thus, additivity at low doses has been invoked as a working hypothesis by regulatory authorities in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Future studies of the joint effects of carcinogenic agents may serve to elucidate the mechanisms by which interactions occur at higher doses.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Krewski & Richard D. Thomas, 1992. "Carcinogenic Mixtures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 105-113, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:12:y:1992:i:1:p:105-113
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01313.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01313.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01313.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Todd W. Thorslund & Charles C. Brown & Gail Charnley, 1987. "Biologically Motivated Cancer Risk Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), pages 109-119, March.
    2. Ralph L. Kodell & Daniel Krewski & Jan M. Zielinski, 1991. "Additive and Multiplicative Relative Risk in the Two‐Stage Clonal Expansion Model of Carcinogenesis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 483-490, September.
    3. Charles C. Brown & Kenneth C. Chu, 1989. "Additive and Multiplicative Models and Multistage Carcinogenesis Theory," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(1), pages 99-105, March.
    4. T. R. Auton, 1991. "Joint Risk from Multiple Compound Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 181-183, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David W. Gaylor & James J. Chen, 1996. "A Simple Upper Limit for the Sum of the Risks of the Components in a Mixture," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 395-398, June.
    2. Chao W. Chen, 1993. "Armitage‐Doll Two‐Stage Model: Implications and Extension," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 273-279, June.
    3. Daniel Wartenberg & Michael A. Gallo, 1990. "The Fallacy of Ranking Possible Carcinogen Hazards Using the TD50," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(4), pages 609-613, December.
    4. Duncan J. Murdoch & Daniel Krewski & John Wargo, 1992. "Cancer Risk Assessment with Intermittent Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 569-577, December.
    5. Harvey J. Clewell III & Dennis W. Quinn & Melvin E. Andersen & Rory B. Conolly, 1995. "An Improved Approximation to the Exact Solution of the Two‐Stage Clonal Growth Model of Cancer," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 467-473, August.
    6. Roland C. Deutsch & Walter W. Piegorsch, 2012. "Benchmark Dose Profiles for Joint-Action Quantal Data in Quantitative Risk Assessment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(4), pages 1313-1322, December.
    7. James J. Chen & David W. Gaylor & Ralph L. Kodell, 1990. "Estimation of the Joint Risk from Multiple‐Compound Exposure Based on Single‐Compound Experiments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(2), pages 285-290, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:12:y:1992:i:1:p:105-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.