IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v59y2012i6p411-429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Averaging frameworks for simulation optimization with applications to simulated annealing

Author

Listed:
  • Andrei A. Prudius
  • Sigrún Andradóttir

Abstract

We present two frameworks for designing random search methods for discrete simulation optimization. One of our frameworks is very broad (in that it includes many random search methods), whereas the other one considers a special class of random search methods called point‐based methods, that move iteratively between points within the feasible region. Our frameworks involve averaging, in that all decisions that require estimates of the objective function values at various feasible solutions are based on the averages of all observations collected at these solutions so far. Also, the methods are adaptive in that they can use information gathered in previous iterations to decide how simulation effort is expended in the current iteration. We show that the methods within our frameworks are almost surely globally convergent under mild conditions. Thus, the generality of our frameworks and associated convergence guarantees makes the frameworks useful to algorithm developers wishing to design efficient and rigorous procedures for simulation optimization. We also present two variants of the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm and provide their convergence analysis as example application of our point‐based framework. Finally, we provide numerical results that demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of averaging and adaptivity in the context of SA. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Andrei A. Prudius & Sigrún Andradóttir, 2012. "Averaging frameworks for simulation optimization with applications to simulated annealing," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(6), pages 411-429, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:59:y:2012:i:6:p:411-429
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21496
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21496?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neddermeijer, H.G. & van Oortmarssen, G.J. & Piersma, N. & Dekker, R., 2000. "A framework for response surface methodology for simulation optimization," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2000-14/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. Michael C. Fu, 2002. "Feature Article: Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. Practice," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 192-215, August.
    3. John N. Tsitsiklis, 1989. "Markov Chains with Rare Transitions and Simulated Annealing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(1), pages 70-90, February.
    4. Mahmoud H. Alrefaei & Sigrún Andradóttir, 1999. "A Simulated Annealing Algorithm with Constant Temperature for Discrete Stochastic Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 748-764, May.
    5. Bruce Hajek, 1988. "Cooling Schedules for Optimal Annealing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 311-329, May.
    6. Sigrún Andradóttir & Andrei A. Prudius, 2009. "Balanced Explorative and Exploitative Search with Estimation for Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 193-208, May.
    7. L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2006. "Discrete Optimization via Simulation Using COMPASS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 115-129, February.
    8. Jan Hannig & Edwin K. P. Chong & Sanjeev R. Kulkarni, 2006. "Relative Frequencies of Generalized Simulated Annealing," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 199-216, February.
    9. Alrefaei, Mahmoud H. & Andradottir, Sigrun, 2001. "A modification of the stochastic ruler method for discrete stochastic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 160-182, August.
    10. Mahmoud H. Alrefaei & Sigrún Andradóttir, 2005. "Discrete stochastic optimization using variants of the stochastic ruler method," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 344-360, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satyajith Amaran & Nikolaos V. Sahinidis & Bikram Sharda & Scott J. Bury, 2016. "Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 351-380, May.
    2. Wang, Honggang, 2012. "Retrospective optimization of mixed-integer stochastic systems using dynamic simplex linear interpolation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 141-148.
    3. Sigrún Andradóttir & Andrei A. Prudius, 2009. "Balanced Explorative and Exploitative Search with Estimation for Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 193-208, May.
    4. Jie Xu & Barry L. Nelson & L. Jeff Hong, 2013. "An Adaptive Hyperbox Algorithm for High-Dimensional Discrete Optimization via Simulation Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 133-146, February.
    5. Chuljin Park & Seong-Hee Kim, 2015. "Penalty Function with Memory for Discrete Optimization via Simulation with Stochastic Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1195-1212, October.
    6. L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2006. "Discrete Optimization via Simulation Using COMPASS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 115-129, February.
    7. Alrefaei, Mahmoud H. & Alawneh, Ameen J., 2005. "Solution quality of random search methods for discrete stochastic optimization," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 115-125.
    8. Qiushi Chen & Lei Zhao & Jan C. Fransoo & Zhe Li, 2019. "Dual-mode inventory management under a chance credit constraint," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 147-178, March.
    9. Alfredo Garcia & Stephen D. Patek & Kaushik Sinha, 2007. "A Decentralized Approach to Discrete Optimization via Simulation: Application to Network Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 717-732, August.
    10. Deniz Preil & Michael Krapp, 2023. "Genetic multi-armed bandits: a reinforcement learning approach for discrete optimization via simulation," Papers 2302.07695, arXiv.org.
    11. Tahir Ekin & Stephen Walker & Paul Damien, 2023. "Augmented simulation methods for discrete stochastic optimization with recourse," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 771-793, January.
    12. Lihua Sun & L. Jeff Hong & Zhaolin Hu, 2014. "Balancing Exploitation and Exploration in Discrete Optimization via Simulation Through a Gaussian Process-Based Search," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1416-1438, December.
    13. Liujia Hu & Sigrún Andradóttir, 2019. "An Asymptotically Optimal Set Approach for Simulation Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 21-39, February.
    14. Shing Chih Tsai, 2013. "Rapid Screening Procedures for Zero-One Optimization via Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 317-331, May.
    15. Löwe, Matthias, 1997. "On the invariant measure of non-reversible simulated annealing," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 189-193, December.
    16. Shamsuddin Ahmed, 2013. "Performance of derivative free search ANN training algorithm with time series and classification problems," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(5), pages 1881-1914, October.
    17. Jing Xie & Peter I. Frazier & Stephen E. Chick, 2016. "Bayesian Optimization via Simulation with Pairwise Sampling and Correlated Prior Beliefs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 542-559, April.
    18. Powell, Warren B., 2019. "A unified framework for stochastic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 795-821.
    19. Mahmoud H. Alrefaei & Sigrún Andradóttir, 2005. "Discrete stochastic optimization using variants of the stochastic ruler method," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 344-360, June.
    20. M Laguna & J Molina & F Pérez & R Caballero & A G Hernández-Díaz, 2010. "The challenge of optimizing expensive black boxes: a scatter search/rough set theory approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(1), pages 53-67, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:59:y:2012:i:6:p:411-429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.