IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v66y2019i8p648-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A worst‐case formulation for constrained ranking and selection with input uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongshun Shi
  • Siyang Gao
  • Hui Xiao
  • Weiwei Chen

Abstract

In this research, we consider robust simulation optimization with stochastic constraints. In particular, we focus on the ranking and selection problem in which the computing time is sufficient to evaluate all the designs (solutions) under consideration. Given a fixed simulation budget, we aim at maximizing the probability of correct selection (PCS) for the best feasible design, where the objective and constraint measures are assessed by their worst‐case performances. To simplify the complexity of PCS, we develop an approximated probability measure and derive the asymptotic optimality condition (optimality condition as the simulation budget goes to infinity) of the resulting problem. A sequential selection procedure is then designed within the optimal computing budget allocation framework. The high efficiency of the proposed procedure is tested via a number of numerical examples. In addition, we provide some useful insights into the efficiency of a budget allocation procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongshun Shi & Siyang Gao & Hui Xiao & Weiwei Chen, 2019. "A worst‐case formulation for constrained ranking and selection with input uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(8), pages 648-662, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:66:y:2019:i:8:p:648-662
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21871
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Goerigk, 2014. "A note on upper bounds to the robust knapsack problem with discrete scenarios," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 461-469, December.
    2. Aharon Ben-Tal & Dick den Hertog & Anja De Waegenaere & Bertrand Melenberg & Gijs Rennen, 2013. "Robust Solutions of Optimization Problems Affected by Uncertain Probabilities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 341-357, April.
    3. Michael C. Fu, 2002. "Feature Article: Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. Practice," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 192-215, August.
    4. Barry L. Nelson & Julie Swann & David Goldsman & Wheyming Song, 2001. "Simple Procedures for Selecting the Best Simulated System When the Number of Alternatives is Large," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 950-963, December.
    5. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & van Beers, W.C.M. & van Nieuwenhuyse, I., 2008. "Constrained Optimization in Simulation : A Novel Approach," Other publications TiSEM e49ba0fc-853c-4a13-b564-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Ling, Aifan & Sun, Jie & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2014. "Robust tracking error portfolio selection with worst-case downside risk measures," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 178-207.
    7. Siyang Gao & Weiwei Chen, 2016. "A new budget allocation framework for selecting top simulated designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(9), pages 855-863, September.
    8. Ahmed, Mohamed A. & Alkhamis, Talal M., 2009. "Simulation optimization for an emergency department healthcare unit in Kuwait," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 936-942, November.
    9. A. Takeda & S. Taguchi & R. H. Tütüncü, 2008. "Adjustable Robust Optimization Models for a Nonlinear Two-Period System," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 275-295, February.
    10. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    11. Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Chun-Hung Chen & Xiaoping Xiong, 2007. "Simulation Allocation for Determining the Best Design in the Presence of Correlated Sampling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 101-111, February.
    12. Russell R. Barton & Barry L. Nelson & Wei Xie, 2014. "Quantifying Input Uncertainty via Simulation Confidence Intervals," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 74-87, February.
    13. Sigrún Andradóttir & Seong‐Hee Kim, 2010. "Fully sequential procedures for comparing constrained systems via simulation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(5), pages 403-421, August.
    14. Sridhar Bashyam & Michael C. Fu, 1998. "Optimization of (s, S) Inventory Systems with Random Lead Times and a Service Level Constraint," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 243-256, December.
    15. Christopher M. Healey & Sigrún Andradóttir & Seong-Hee Kim, 2015. "A minimal switching procedure for constrained ranking and selection under independent or common random numbers," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(11), pages 1170-1184, November.
    16. Kleijnen, Jack P.C. & Beers, Wim van & Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke van, 2010. "Constrained optimization in expensive simulation: Novel approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 164-174, April.
    17. Susan R. Hunter & Raghu Pasupathy, 2013. "Optimal Sampling Laws for Stochastically Constrained Simulation Optimization on Finite Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 527-542, August.
    18. Stephen E. Chick & Jürgen Branke & Christian Schmidt, 2010. "Sequential Sampling to Myopically Maximize the Expected Value of Information," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 71-80, February.
    19. Joel Goh & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization and Its Tractable Approximations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 902-917, August.
    20. Stephen E. Chick & Koichiro Inoue, 2001. "New Two-Stage and Sequential Procedures for Selecting the Best Simulated System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 732-743, October.
    21. Chun-Hung Chen & Donghai He & Michael Fu & Loo Hay Lee, 2008. "Efficient Simulation Budget Allocation for Selecting an Optimal Subset," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 579-595, November.
    22. Siyang Gao & Weiwei Chen & Leyuan Shi, 2017. "A New Budget Allocation Framework for the Expected Opportunity Cost," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 787-803, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Corlu, Canan G. & Akcay, Alp & Xie, Wei, 2020. "Stochastic simulation under input uncertainty: A Review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhongshun Shi & Yijie Peng & Leyuan Shi & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu, 2022. "Dynamic Sampling Allocation Under Finite Simulation Budget for Feasibility Determination," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 557-568, January.
    2. Peter I. Frazier, 2014. "A Fully Sequential Elimination Procedure for Indifference-Zone Ranking and Selection with Tight Bounds on Probability of Correct Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 926-942, August.
    3. Qiushi Chen & Lei Zhao & Jan C. Fransoo & Zhe Li, 2019. "Dual-mode inventory management under a chance credit constraint," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(1), pages 147-178, March.
    4. Juergen Branke & Wen Zhang, 2019. "Identifying efficient solutions via simulation: myopic multi-objective budget allocation for the bi-objective case," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(3), pages 831-865, September.
    5. Gongbo Zhang & Yijie Peng & Jianghua Zhang & Enlu Zhou, 2023. "Asymptotically Optimal Sampling Policy for Selecting Top- m Alternatives," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 1261-1285, November.
    6. Tsai, Shing Chih & Fu, Sheng Yang, 2014. "Genetic-algorithm-based simulation optimization considering a single stochastic constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 113-125.
    7. Weiwei Fan & L. Jeff Hong & Xiaowei Zhang, 2020. "Distributionally Robust Selection of the Best," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 190-208, January.
    8. Daniel Russo, 2020. "Simple Bayesian Algorithms for Best-Arm Identification," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1625-1647, November.
    9. Powell, Warren B., 2019. "A unified framework for stochastic optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 795-821.
    10. Weiwei Chen & Siyang Gao & Wenjie Chen & Jianzhong Du, 2023. "Optimizing resource allocation in service systems via simulation: A Bayesian formulation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 65-81, January.
    11. Kabirian, Alireza & Ólafsson, Sigurdur, 2011. "Continuous optimization via simulation using Golden Region search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 19-27, January.
    12. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    13. Antonio J. Conejo & Nicholas G. Hall & Daniel Zhuoyu Long & Runhao Zhang, 2021. "Robust Capacity Planning for Project Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1533-1550, October.
    14. Wang, Fan & Zhang, Chao & Zhang, Hui & Xu, Liang, 2021. "Short-term physician rescheduling model with feature-driven demand for mental disorders outpatients," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Melvyn Sim, 2014. "Distributionally Robust Convex Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1358-1376, December.
    16. Henry Lam & Clementine Mottet, 2017. "Tail Analysis Without Parametric Models: A Worst-Case Perspective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1696-1711, December.
    17. Postek, Krzysztof & Ben-Tal, A. & den Hertog, Dick & Melenberg, Bertrand, 2015. "Exact Robust Counterparts of Ambiguous Stochastic Constraints Under Mean and Dispersion Information," Other publications TiSEM d718e419-a375-4707-b206-e, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Haolin Ruan & Zhi Chen & Chin Pang Ho, 2023. "Adjustable Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1002-1023, September.
    19. Jie Xu & Barry L. Nelson & L. Jeff Hong, 2013. "An Adaptive Hyperbox Algorithm for High-Dimensional Discrete Optimization via Simulation Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 133-146, February.
    20. Yijie Peng & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu, 2016. "Dynamic Sampling Allocation and Design Selection," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 195-208, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:66:y:2019:i:8:p:648-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.