IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v55y2008i1p16-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic routing of prioritized warranty repairs

Author

Listed:
  • Feng Chen
  • Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni

Abstract

Recent years have seen a strong trend toward outsourcing warranty repair services to outside vendors. In this article we consider the problem of dynamically routing warranty repairs to service vendors when warranties have priority levels. Each time an item under warranty fails, it is sent to one of the vendors for repair. Items covered by higher priority warranty receive higher priority in repair service. The manufacturer pays a fixed fee per repair and incurs a linear holding cost while an item is undergoing or waiting for repair. The objective is to minimize the manufacturer's long‐run average cost. Because of the complexity of the problem, it is very unlikely that there exist tractable ways to find the optimal routing strategies. Therefore, we propose five heuristic routing procedures that are applicable to real‐life problems. We evaluate the heuristics using simulation. The simulation results show that the index‐based “generalized join the shortest queue” policy, which applies a single policy improvement step to an initial state‐independent policy, performs the best among all five heuristics. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2008

Suggested Citation

  • Feng Chen & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni, 2008. "Dynamic routing of prioritized warranty repairs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(1), pages 16-26, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:55:y:2008:i:1:p:16-26
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L Ding & K D Glazebrook, 2005. "A static allocation model for the outsourcing of warranty repairs," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(7), pages 825-835, July.
    2. Murthy, D. N. P. & Djamaludin, I., 2002. "New product warranty: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 231-260, October.
    3. P S Ansell & K D Glazebrook & C Kirkbride, 2003. "Generalised ‘join the shortest queue’ policies for the dynamic routing of jobs to multi-class queues," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(4), pages 379-389, April.
    4. Michelle Opp & Kevin Glazebrook & Vidyadhar G. Kulkarni, 2005. "Outsourcing warranty repairs: Dynamic allocation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(5), pages 381-398, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D Worthington, 2009. "Reflections on queue modelling from the last 50 years," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 83-92, May.
    2. Appelbaum, Elie, 1992. "Bankruptcy, Warranties and the Firm's Capital Structure," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 33(2), pages 399-412, May.
    3. Zhou, Chongwen & Chinnam, Ratna Babu & Dalkiran, Evrim & Korostelev, Alexander, 2017. "Bayesian approach to hazard rate models for early detection of warranty and reliability problems using upstream supply chain information," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 316-331.
    4. Luo, Ming & Wu, Shaomin, 2019. "A comprehensive analysis of warranty claims and optimal policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 144-159.
    5. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Joaquín Coleff, 2020. "Can consumer complaints reduce product reliability? Should we worry?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 74-96, January.
    7. Liu, Yiliu & Liu, Zixian & Wang, Yukun, 2013. "Customized warranty offering for configurable products," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-7.
    8. Darghouth, M.N. & Ait-kadi, D. & Chelbi, A., 2017. "Joint optimization of design, warranty and price for products sold with maintenance service contracts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 197-208.
    9. Coleff, Joaquín, 2011. "Product reliability, consumers’ complaints and market performance: the case of consumers’ associations," UC3M Working papers. Economics we1121, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    10. Wang, Xiaolin & Li, Lishuai & Xie, Min, 2020. "An unpunctual preventive maintenance policy under two-dimensional warranty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 304-318.
    11. Mitra, Amitava, 2021. "Warranty parameters for extended two-dimensional warranties incorporating consumer preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 525-535.
    12. Vergara, Marcos & Bonilla, Claudio A. & Sepulveda, Jean P., 2016. "The complementarity effect: Effort and sharing in the entrepreneur and venture capital contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(3), pages 1017-1025.
    13. Li Ding & Kevin D. Glazebrook & Christopher Kirkbride, 2008. "Allocation Models and Heuristics for the Outsourcing of Repairs for a Dynamic Warranty Population," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 594-607, March.
    14. Nan Zhang & Mitra Fouladirad & Anne Barros, 2018. "Warranty analysis of a two-component system with type I stochastic dependence," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(3), pages 274-283, June.
    15. Ram Niwas & M. S. Kadyan, 2022. "A bi-objective inspection policy for a repairable engineering system with failure free warranty," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 881-891, April.
    16. I. Adan & O. Boxma, 2007. "Comments on: Dynamic priority allocation via restless bandit marginal productivity indices," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 15(2), pages 199-201, December.
    17. SamatlI-Pa, Glay & Taner, Mehmet R., 2009. "The role of repair strategy in warranty cost minimization: An investigation via quasi-renewal processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 632-641, September.
    18. Fuli Zhou & Xu Wang & Yun Lin & Yandong He & Lin Zhou, 2016. "Strategic Part Prioritization for Quality Improvement Practice Using a Hybrid MCDM Framework: A Case Application in an Auto Factory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Wu, Shaomin & Longhurst, Phil, 2011. "Optimising age-replacement and extended non-renewing warranty policies in lifecycle costing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 262-267, April.
    20. Wu, Shaomin, 2011. "Warranty claim analysis considering human factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 131-138.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:55:y:2008:i:1:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.