IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v51y2004i6p800-817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic scheduling subject to machine breakdowns: The preemptive‐repeat model with discounted reward and other criteria

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqiang Cai
  • Xiaoqian Sun
  • Xian Zhou

Abstract

We consider the problem of scheduling a set of jobs on a single machine subject to random breakdowns. We focus on the preemptive‐repeat model, which addresses the situation where, if a machine breaks down during the processing of a job, the work done on the job prior to the breakdown is lost and the job will have to be started from the beginning again when the machine resumes its work. We allow that (i) the uptimes and downtimes of the machine follow general probability distributions, (ii) the breakdown process of the machine depends upon the job being processed, (iii) the processing times of the jobs are random variables following arbitrary distributions, and (iv) after a breakdown, the processing time of a job may either remain a same but unknown amount, or be resampled according to its probability distribution. We first derive the optimal policy for a class of problems under the criterion to maximize the expected discounted reward earned from completing all jobs. The result is then applied to further obtain the optimal policies for other due date‐related criteria. We also discuss a method to compute the moments and probability distributions of job completion times by using their Laplace transforms, which can convert a general stochastic scheduling problem to its deterministic equivalent. The weighted squared flowtime problem and the maintenance checkup and repair problem are analyzed as applications. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2004

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqiang Cai & Xiaoqian Sun & Xian Zhou, 2004. "Stochastic scheduling subject to machine breakdowns: The preemptive‐repeat model with discounted reward and other criteria," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(6), pages 800-817, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:51:y:2004:i:6:p:800-817
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20024
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael H. Rothkopf, 1966. "Scheduling with Random Service Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(9), pages 707-713, May.
    2. Michael H. Rothkopf, 1966. "Scheduling Independent Tasks on Parallel Processors," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 437-447, January.
    3. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xian Zhou, 2000. "Asymmetric Earliness and Tardiness Scheduling with Exponential Processing Times on an Unreliable Machine," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 313-331, December.
    4. J. Birge & J. B. G. Frenk & J. Mittenthal & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1990. "Single‐machine scheduling subject to stochastic breakdowns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 661-677, October.
    5. Michael H. Rothkopf & Stephen A. Smith, 1984. "Technical Note—There are No Undiscovered Priority Index Sequencing Rules for Minimizing Total Delay Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 451-456, April.
    6. John Mittenthal & M. Raghavachari, 1993. "Stochastic Single Machine Scheduling with Quadratic Early-Tardy Penalties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 786-796, August.
    7. I. Adiri & E. Frostig & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1991. "Scheduling on a single machine with a single breakdown to minimize stochastically the number of tardy jobs," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 261-271, April.
    8. Xiaoqiang Cai & Sean Zhou, 1999. "Stochastic Scheduling on Parallel Machines Subject to Random Breakdowns to Minimize Expected Costs for Earliness and Tardy Jobs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 422-437, June.
    9. W. Townsend, 1978. "The Single Machine Problem with Quadratic Penalty Function of Completion Times: A Branch-and-Bound Solution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 530-534, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yarlin Kuo & Zi‐Ann Chang, 2007. "Integrated production scheduling and preventive maintenance planning for a single machine under a cumulative damage failure process," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(6), pages 602-614, September.
    2. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xianyi Wu & Xian Zhou, 2009. "Stochastic Scheduling Subject to Preemptive-Repeat Breakdowns with Incomplete Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1236-1249, October.
    3. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xianyi Wu & Xian Zhou, 2021. "Optimal unrestricted dynamic stochastic scheduling with partial losses of work due to breakdowns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 43-64, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xianyi Wu & Xian Zhou, 2021. "Optimal unrestricted dynamic stochastic scheduling with partial losses of work due to breakdowns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 43-64, March.
    2. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xianyi Wu & Xian Zhou, 2009. "Stochastic Scheduling Subject to Preemptive-Repeat Breakdowns with Incomplete Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1236-1249, October.
    3. Szmerekovsky, Joseph G., 2007. "Single machine scheduling under market uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 163-175, February.
    4. Bertsimas, Dimitris., 1995. "The achievable region method in the optimal control of queueing systems : formulations, bounds and policies," Working papers 3837-95., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    5. Zhenpeng Li & Congdian Cheng, 2023. "The Expected Competitive Ratio on a Kind of Stochastic-Online Flowtime Scheduling with Machine Subject to an Uncertain Breakdown," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Ji-Bo Wang & Ming-Zheng Wang, 2011. "Worst-case behavior of simple sequencing rules in flow shop scheduling with general position-dependent learning effects," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 155-169, November.
    7. Li, Gang & Wang, Xiao-Yuan & Wang, Ji-Bo & Sun, Lin-Yan, 2013. "Worst case analysis of flow shop scheduling problems with a time-dependent learning effect," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 98-104.
    8. José Niño-Mora, 2000. "Beyond Smith's rule: An optimal dynamic index, rule for single machine stochastic scheduling with convex holding costs," Economics Working Papers 514, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    9. Cheng, T. C. Edwin & Shakhlevich, Natalia V., 2005. "Minimizing non-decreasing separable objective functions for the unit-time open shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 444-456, September.
    10. Umar M. Al‐Turki & John Mittenthal & M. Raghavachari, 1996. "The single‐machine absolute‐deviation early‐tardy problem with random completion times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 573-587, June.
    11. Xiaoqiang Cai & Sean Zhou, 1999. "Stochastic Scheduling on Parallel Machines Subject to Random Breakdowns to Minimize Expected Costs for Earliness and Tardy Jobs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 422-437, June.
    12. X. Cai & F. S. Tu, 1996. "Scheduling jobs with random processing times on a single machine subject to stochastic breakdowns to minimize early‐tardy penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(8), pages 1127-1146, December.
    13. Meng, Lingyun & Zhou, Xuesong, 2011. "Robust single-track train dispatching model under a dynamic and stochastic environment: A scenario-based rolling horizon solution approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1080-1102, August.
    14. Pandelis, Dimitrios G., 2007. "Optimal preemptive scheduling on uniform machines with discounted flowtime objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 630-637, February.
    15. Ali Allahverdi & John Mittenthal, 1994. "Scheduling on M parallel machines subject to random breakdowns to minimize expected mean flow time," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(5), pages 677-682, August.
    16. Martin Skutella & Maxim Sviridenko & Marc Uetz, 2016. "Unrelated Machine Scheduling with Stochastic Processing Times," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 851-864, August.
    17. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    18. Huynh Tuong, Nguyen & Soukhal, Ameur & Billaut, Jean-Charles, 2010. "A new dynamic programming formulation for scheduling independent tasks with common due date on parallel machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 646-653, May.
    19. Brian C. Dean & Michel X. Goemans & Jan Vondrák, 2008. "Approximating the Stochastic Knapsack Problem: The Benefit of Adaptivity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 945-964, November.
    20. Mandelbaum, Marvin & Hlynka, Myron, 2003. "Job sequencing using an expert," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 389-401, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:51:y:2004:i:6:p:800-817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.