IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v37y1990i5p661-677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single‐machine scheduling subject to stochastic breakdowns

Author

Listed:
  • J. Birge
  • J. B. G. Frenk
  • J. Mittenthal
  • A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan

Abstract

We provide several examples of one‐machine problems in which the minimization of expected cost subject to stochastic breakdowns of the machine can be successfully attacked analytically. In particular for the weighted flow‐time model, we derive strong bounds on the difference between the optimal static policy and the WSPT policy and discuss an example in which the WSPT policy is not optimal.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Birge & J. B. G. Frenk & J. Mittenthal & A. H. G. Rinnooy Kan, 1990. "Single‐machine scheduling subject to stochastic breakdowns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(5), pages 661-677, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:5:p:661-677
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199010)37:53.0.CO;2-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199010)37:53.0.CO;2-3
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199010)37:53.0.CO;2-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael L. Pinedo & Sheldon M. Ross, 1980. "Scheduling Jobs Subject to Nonhomogeneous Poisson Shocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(12), pages 1250-1257, December.
    2. Kevin D. Glazebrook, 1987. "Evaluating the effects of machine breakdowns in stochastic scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 319-335, June.
    3. K. D. Glazebrook, 1984. "Scheduling stochastic jobs on a single machine subject to breakdowns," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 251-264, June.
    4. K. D. Glazebrook, 1981. "On nonpreemptive strategies in stochastic scheduling," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 289-300, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Yang & Gang Yu, 2002. "On the Robust Single Machine Scheduling Problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 17-33, March.
    2. X. Cai & F. S. Tu, 1996. "Scheduling jobs with random processing times on a single machine subject to stochastic breakdowns to minimize early‐tardy penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(8), pages 1127-1146, December.
    3. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xianyi Wu & Xian Zhou, 2009. "Stochastic Scheduling Subject to Preemptive-Repeat Breakdowns with Incomplete Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1236-1249, October.
    4. Zhenpeng Li & Congdian Cheng, 2023. "The Expected Competitive Ratio on a Kind of Stochastic-Online Flowtime Scheduling with Machine Subject to an Uncertain Breakdown," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, May.
    5. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xianyi Wu & Xian Zhou, 2021. "Optimal unrestricted dynamic stochastic scheduling with partial losses of work due to breakdowns," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 43-64, March.
    6. Sid Browne & Kevin D. Glazebrook, 1996. "Scheduling jobs that are subject to failure propagation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 265-288, March.
    7. K. D. Glazebrook, 1992. "Single‐machine scheduling of stochastic jobs subject to deterioration or delay," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 613-633, August.
    8. Xiaoqiang Cai & Xiaoqian Sun & Xian Zhou, 2004. "Stochastic scheduling subject to machine breakdowns: The preemptive‐repeat model with discounted reward and other criteria," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(6), pages 800-817, September.
    9. Umar M. Al‐Turki & John Mittenthal & M. Raghavachari, 1996. "The single‐machine absolute‐deviation early‐tardy problem with random completion times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 573-587, June.
    10. Xiaoqiang Cai & Sean Zhou, 1999. "Stochastic Scheduling on Parallel Machines Subject to Random Breakdowns to Minimize Expected Costs for Earliness and Tardy Jobs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 422-437, June.
    11. Ali Allahverdi & John Mittenthal, 1994. "Scheduling on M parallel machines subject to random breakdowns to minimize expected mean flow time," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(5), pages 677-682, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. D. Glazebrook, 1992. "Single‐machine scheduling of stochastic jobs subject to deterioration or delay," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 613-633, August.
    2. Yarlin Kuo & Zi‐Ann Chang, 2007. "Integrated production scheduling and preventive maintenance planning for a single machine under a cumulative damage failure process," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(6), pages 602-614, September.
    3. S. E. Pilnick & K. D. Glazebrook & D. P. Gaver, 1991. "Optimal sequential replenishment of ships during combat," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 637-668, October.
    4. Sid Browne & Kevin D. Glazebrook, 1996. "Scheduling jobs that are subject to failure propagation," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 265-288, March.
    5. Zhenpeng Li & Congdian Cheng, 2023. "The Expected Competitive Ratio on a Kind of Stochastic-Online Flowtime Scheduling with Machine Subject to an Uncertain Breakdown," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Li, Wei & Glazebrook, Kevin D., 1998. "On stochastic machine scheduling with general distributional assumptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 525-536, March.
    7. Charles Du & Michael Pinedo, 1995. "A note on minimizing the expected makespan in flowshops subject to breakdowns," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(8), pages 1251-1262, December.
    8. Jonathan Bard & David Morton & Yong Wang, 2007. "Workforce planning at USPS mail processing and distribution centers using stochastic optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 51-78, November.
    9. Xiaoqiang Cai & Sean Zhou, 1999. "Stochastic Scheduling on Parallel Machines Subject to Random Breakdowns to Minimize Expected Costs for Earliness and Tardy Jobs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 422-437, June.
    10. K. D. Glazebrook, 1995. "A suboptimality bound for permutation policies in single machine stochastic scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(6), pages 993-1005, September.
    11. Masaaki Kijima & Toshio Nakagawa, 1991. "A cumulative damage shock model with imperfect preventive maintenance," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 145-156, April.
    12. Sam Ransbotham & Ishwar Murthy & Sabyasachi Mitra & Sridhar Narasimhan, 2011. "Sequential Grid Computing: Models and Computational Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 174-188, May.
    13. Lee, Chung-Yee & Lin, Chen-Sin, 2001. "Single-machine scheduling with maintenance and repair rate-modifying activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 493-513, December.
    14. Kevin D. Glazebrook, 1987. "Evaluating the effects of machine breakdowns in stochastic scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 319-335, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:37:y:1990:i:5:p:661-677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.