IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v50y2003i2p149-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonrobustness of the normal approximation of lead‐time demand in a (Q, R) system

Author

Listed:
  • Hon‐Shiang Lau
  • Amy Hing‐Ling Lau

Abstract

For computing an optimal (Q, R) or kindred inventory policy, the current literature provides mixed signals on whether or when it is safe to approximate a nonnormal lead‐time‐demand (“LTD”) distribution by a normal distribution. The first part of this paper examines this literature critically to justify why the issue warrants further investigations, while the second part presents reliable evidence showing that the system‐cost penalty for using the normal approximation can be quite serious even when the LTD‐distribution's coefficient of variation is quite low—contrary to the prevalent view of the literature. We also identify situations that will most likely lead to large system‐cost penalty. Our results indicate that, given today's technology, it is worthwhile to estimate an LTD‐distribution's shape more accurately and to compute optimal inventory policies using statistical distributions that more accurately reflect the LTD‐distributions' actual shapes. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2003

Suggested Citation

  • Hon‐Shiang Lau & Amy Hing‐Ling Lau, 2003. "Nonrobustness of the normal approximation of lead‐time demand in a (Q, R) system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(2), pages 149-166, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:50:y:2003:i:2:p:149-166
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.10053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10053
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.10053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Min-Chiang & Subba Rao, S., 1992. "Estimating reorder points and other management science applications by bootstrap procedure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 332-342, February.
    2. Tadikamalla, Pandu R, 1984. "A comparison of several approximations to the lead time demand distribution," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 575-581.
    3. Shore, Haim, 1999. "Optimal solutions for stochastic inventory models when the lead-time demand distribution is partially specified," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 477-485, March.
    4. Bookbinder, James H. & Cakanyildirim, Metin, 1999. "Random lead times and expedited orders in (Q,r) inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 300-313, June.
    5. Eliezer Naddor, 1978. "Note--Sensitivity to Distributions in Inventory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(16), pages 1769-1772, December.
    6. Anne E. Lordahl & James H. Bookbinder, 1994. "Order‐statistic calculation, costs, and service in an (s, Q) inventory system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 81-97, February.
    7. David E. Platt & Lawrence W. Robinson & Robert B. Freund, 1997. "Tractable (Q, R) Heuristic Models for Constrained Service Levels," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(7), pages 951-965, July.
    8. Eliezer Naddor, 1975. "Optimal and Heuristic Decisions in Single-and Multi-Item Inventory Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(11), pages 1234-1249, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janssen, E. & Strijbosch, L.W.G. & Brekelmans, R.C.M., 2006. "Assessing the Effects of using Demand Parameters Estimates in Inventory Control," Discussion Paper 2006-90, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rossetti, Manuel D. & Yasin Ünlü, 2011. "Evaluating the robustness of lead time demand models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 159-176, November.
    2. Vernimmen, Bert & Dullaert, Wout & Willemé, Peter & Witlox, Frank, 2008. "Using the inventory-theoretic framework to determine cost-minimizing supply strategies in a stochastic setting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 248-259, September.
    3. Chiang, Chi, 2010. "An order expediting policy for continuous review systems with manufacturing lead-time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 526-531, June.
    4. John P. Saldanha & Bradley S. Price & Douglas J. Thomas, 2023. "A nonparametric approach for setting safety stock levels," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(4), pages 1150-1168, April.
    5. John E. Tyworth & Liam O'Neill, 1997. "Robustness of the normal approximation of lead‐time demand in a distribution setting," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 165-186, March.
    6. Mekhtiev, Mirza Arif, 2013. "Analytical evaluation of lead-time demand in polytree supply chains with uncertain demand, lead-time and inter-demand time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 304-317.
    7. Bichescu, Bogdan C. & Fry, Michael J., 2009. "A numerical analysis of supply chain performance under split decision rights," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 358-379, April.
    8. Anne E. Lordahl & James H. Bookbinder, 1994. "Order‐statistic calculation, costs, and service in an (s, Q) inventory system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(1), pages 81-97, February.
    9. Strijbosch, L.W.G. & Moors, J.J.A., 1999. "Simple Expressions for Safety Factors in Inventory Control," Discussion Paper 1999-112, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    10. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    11. Ben-Ammar, Oussama & Bettayeb, Belgacem & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Optimization of multi-period supply planning under stochastic lead times and a dynamic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 106-117.
    12. Boylan, John E. & Babai, M. Zied, 2022. "Estimating the cumulative distribution function of lead-time demand using bootstrapping with and without replacement," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    13. Kevin H. Shang & Sean X. Zhou & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2010. "Improving Supply Chain Performance: Real-Time Demand Information and Flexible Deliveries," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 430-448, May.
    14. E A Silver, 2004. "An overview of heuristic solution methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 936-956, September.
    15. Tempelmeier, Horst & Bantel, Oliver, 2015. "Integrated optimization of safety stock and transportation capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 101-112.
    16. P. Majumder & U. K. Bera & M. Maiti, 2020. "An EPQ model of substitutable products under trade credit policy with stock dependent and random substitution," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(4), pages 1205-1243, December.
    17. Chan, Chi Kin & Fang, Fei & Langevin, André, 2018. "Single-vendor multi-buyer supply chain coordination with stochastic demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 110-133.
    18. Marcus Ang & Karl Sigman & Jing-Sheng Song & Hanqin Zhang, 2017. "Closed-Form Approximations for Optimal ( r , q ) and ( S , T ) Policies in a Parallel Processing Environment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1414-1428, October.
    19. Daniela Favaretto & Alessandro Marin & Marco Tolotti, 2023. "A theoretical validation of the DDMRP reorder policy," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Riezebos, Jan, 2006. "Inventory order crossovers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 666-675, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:50:y:2003:i:2:p:149-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.