IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v43y1996i6p821-837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding saddle points on polyhedra: Solving certain continuous minimax problems

Author

Listed:
  • George E. Monahan

Abstract

This article reviews procedures for computing saddle points of certain continuous concave‐convex functions defined on polyhedra and investigates how certain parameters and payoff functions influence equilibrium solutions. The discussion centers on two widely studied applications: missile defense and market‐share attraction games. In both settings, each player allocates a limited resource, called effort, among a finite number of alternatives. Equilibrium solutions to these two‐person games are particularly easy to compute under a proportional effectiveness hypothesis, either in closed form or in a finite number of steps. One of the more interesting qualitative properties we establish is the identification of conditions under which the maximizing player can ignore the values of the alternatives in determining allocation decisions. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • George E. Monahan, 1996. "Finding saddle points on polyhedra: Solving certain continuous minimax problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(6), pages 821-837, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:6:p:821-837
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199609)43:63.0.CO;2-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199609)43:63.0.CO;2-6
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199609)43:63.0.CO;2-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George E. Monahan, 1987. "The Structure of Equilibria in Market Share Attraction Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 228-243, February.
    2. Edward S. Pearsall, 1976. "A Lagrange Multiplier Method for Certain Constrained Min-Max Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 70-91, February.
    3. John S. Croucher, 1975. "Application of the fundamental theorem of games to an example concerning antiballistic missile defense," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 197-203, March.
    4. Richard Schmalensee, 1976. "A Model of Promotional Competition in Oligopoly," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 43(3), pages 493-507.
    5. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1974. "Defense Applications of Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1086-1096, October.
    6. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1974. "Technical Note—A Method for Solving Mathematical Programs with Nonlinear Programs in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1097-1101, October.
    7. Shapley, Lloyd S & Shubik, Martin, 1977. "Trade Using One Commodity as a Means of Payment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(5), pages 937-968, October.
    8. William Hogan, 1973. "Directional Derivatives for Extremal-Value Functions with Applications to the Completely Convex Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 188-209, February.
    9. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1973. "Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    10. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1974. "Optimization of strategic defenses to provide specified post‐attack production capacities," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 663-672, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ankur Sinha & Zhichao Lu & Kalyanmoy Deb & Pekka Malo, 2020. "Bilevel optimization based on iterative approximation of multiple mappings," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 151-185, April.
    2. Allan Peñafiel Mera & Chandra Balijepalli, 2020. "Towards improving resilience of cities: an optimisation approach to minimising vulnerability to disruption due to natural disasters under budgetary constraints," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1809-1842, August.
    3. Eggert, Wolfgang & Kolmar, Martin, 2006. "Contests with size effects," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 989-1008, December.
    4. Mustapha Kaci & Sonia Radjef, 2023. "An adaptive method to solve multilevel multiobjective linear programming problems," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(3), pages 29-44.
    5. Yunjia Ma & Wei Xu & Lianjie Qin & Xiujuan Zhao, 2019. "Site Selection Models in Natural Disaster Shelters: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    7. Mesak, Hani I., 1999. "On the generalizability of advertising pulsation monopoly results to an oligopoly," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 429-449, September.
    8. Gabriel Lopez Zenarosa & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2021. "On exact solution approaches for bilevel quadratic 0–1 knapsack problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 555-572, March.
    9. Hua Ke & Junjie Ma & Guangdong Tian, 2017. "Hybrid multilevel programming with uncertain random parameters," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 589-596, March.
    10. Meirowitz, Adam, 2005. "Deliberative Democracy or Market Democracy: Designing Institutions to Aggregate Preferences and Information," Papers 03-28-2005, Princeton University, Research Program in Political Economy.
    11. Dimitrios Tsomocos, 2003. "Equilibrium analysis, banking, contagion and financial fragility," FMG Discussion Papers dp450, Financial Markets Group.
    12. Menzio, Guido & Shi, Shouyong & Sun, Hongfei, 2013. "A monetary theory with non-degenerate distributions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(6), pages 2266-2312.
    13. Andrés Carvajal, 2018. "Arbitrage pricing in non-Walrasian financial markets," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(4), pages 951-978, December.
    14. Toraubally, Waseem A., 2018. "Large market games, the law of one price, and market structure," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 13-26.
    15. Germano, Fabrizio, 2003. "Bertrand-edgeworth equilibria in finite exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5-6), pages 677-692, July.
    16. Igor V. EVSTIGNEEVY & Thorsten HENS & Klaus Reiner SCHENK-HOPPE, 2010. "An evolutionary financial market model with a risk-free asset," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 10-36, Swiss Finance Institute.
    17. Amir, Rabah & Bloch, Francis, 2009. "Comparative statics in a simple class of strategic market games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 7-24, January.
    18. Malcolm Brady, 2021. "A Game-Theoretic Model of Strategic Interaction Using Advertising: Simulating the Evolution of the Cournot Nash Equilibrium under Different Competitive Scenarios," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Sjur Didrik Flåm, 2013. "Reaching Market Equilibrium Merely by Bilateral Barters," CESifo Working Paper Series 4504, CESifo.
    20. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:43:y:1996:i:6:p:821-837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.