IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v41y1994i6p807-819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheduling with resource‐dependent release dates—a comparison of two different resource consumption functions

Author

Listed:
  • Chung‐Lun Li

Abstract

We consider the problem of scheduling a set of jobs on a single machine where the release time of a job is related to the amount of resource consumed. The objective is to minimize the total resource consumption with a control on the completion times of the jobs. Four different variants of the problem are studied: (i) minimization of the total resource consumption subject to a common deadline for all jobs, (ii) minimization of the total resource consumption subject to a constraint on the total completion time of the jobs, (iii) minimization of the weighted total resource consumption and maximum job completion time, and (iv) minimization of the weighted total resource consumption and the total job completion time. We compare the common resource consumption function with the function where the resource consumed is proportional to the processing time of the job. We show that these two different resource consumption functions can give rise to very different solution methods and different computational complexities for the problem. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung‐Lun Li, 1994. "Scheduling with resource‐dependent release dates—a comparison of two different resource consumption functions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(6), pages 807-819, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:6:p:807-819
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199410)41:63.0.CO;2-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199410)41:63.0.CO;2-8
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199410)41:63.0.CO;2-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas G. Hall & Wieslaw Kubiak & Suresh P. Sethi, 1991. "Earliness–Tardiness Scheduling Problems, II: Deviation of Completion Times About a Restrictive Common Due Date," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 847-856, October.
    2. Janiak, Adam, 1991. "Single machine scheduling problem with a common deadline and resource dependent release dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 317-325, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chung‐Lun Li & Edward C. Sewell & T. C. E. Cheng, 1995. "Scheduling to minimize release‐time resource consumption and tardiness penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(6), pages 949-966, September.
    2. Ventura, Jose A. & Kim, Daecheol & Garriga, Frederic, 2002. "Single machine earliness-tardiness scheduling with resource-dependent release dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(1), pages 52-69, October.
    3. Cheng, T.C. Edwin & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y. & Shakhlevich, Natalia V., 2006. "Scheduling with controllable release dates and processing times: Total completion time minimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 769-781, December.
    4. X. Cai & F. S. Tu, 1996. "Scheduling jobs with random processing times on a single machine subject to stochastic breakdowns to minimize early‐tardy penalties," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(8), pages 1127-1146, December.
    5. Mosheiov, Gur, 2005. "Minimizing total completion time and total deviation of job completion times from a restrictive due-date," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 20-33, August.
    6. Li, Y. & Ip, W. H. & Wang, D. W., 1998. "Genetic algorithm approach to earliness and tardiness production scheduling and planning problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 65-76, January.
    7. Cheng, T. C. Edwin & Janiak, Adam & Kovalyov, Mikhail Y., 2001. "Single machine batch scheduling with resource dependent setup and processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 177-183, November.
    8. Philip Kaminsky & Onur Kaya, 2008. "Scheduling and due‐date quotation in a make‐to‐order supply chain," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(5), pages 444-458, August.
    9. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    10. Baals, Julian & Emde, Simon & Turkensteen, Marcel, 2023. "Minimizing earliness-tardiness costs in supplier networks—A just-in-time truck routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 707-741.
    11. Ali Kordmostafapour & Javad Rezaeian & Iraj Mahdavi & Mahdi Yar Farjad, 2022. "Scheduling unrelated parallel machine problem with multi-mode processing times and batch delivery cost," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1438-1470, December.
    12. Feifeng Zheng & E. Zhang & Yinfeng Xu & Wei-Chiang Hong, 2014. "Competitive analysis for make-to-order scheduling with reliable lead time quotation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 182-198, January.
    13. Cai, X. & Lum, V. Y. S. & Chan, J. M. T., 1997. "Scheduling about a common due date with kob-dependent asymmetric earliness and tardiness penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 154-168, April.
    14. Dvir Shabtay & Moshe Kaspi, 2006. "Minimizing the makespan in open‐shop scheduling problems with a convex resource consumption function," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 204-216, April.
    15. Yuan, Jinjiang, 1996. "A note on the complexity of single-machine scheduling with a common due date, earliness-tardiness, and batch delivery costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 203-205, October.
    16. N. V. R. Mahadev & Aleksandar Pekeč & Fred S. Roberts, 1998. "On the Meaningfulness of Optimal Solutions to Scheduling Problems: Can an Optimal Solution be Nonoptimal?," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3-supplem), pages 120-134, June.
    17. Kerem Bülbül & Safia Kedad-Sidhoum & Halil Şen, 2019. "Single-machine common due date total earliness/tardiness scheduling with machine unavailability," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 543-565, October.
    18. Mosheiov, Gur & Shadmon, Michal, 2001. "Minmax earliness-tardiness costs with unit processing time jobs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 638-652, May.
    19. Ramon Alvarez-Valdes & Enric Crespo & Jose Tamarit & Fulgencia Villa, 2012. "Minimizing weighted earliness–tardiness on a single machine with a common due date using quadratic models," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(3), pages 754-767, October.
    20. Sourd, Francis, 2005. "Punctuality and idleness in just-in-time scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 739-751, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:41:y:1994:i:6:p:807-819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.