IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v39y1992i7p877-892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishing Reliability Goals for Naval Major‐Caliber Ammunition

Author

Listed:
  • Michael P. Bailey
  • Marcelo C. Bartroli
  • Keebom Kang
  • Alexander J. Callahan

Abstract

We describe a decision process for establishing the threshold reliabilities for components of naval major‐caliber ammunition. We present a measure of reliability performance, called ef*, which relates directly to the weapons system's performance in a naval gunfire support environment. We use a simulation model to establish this relationship, a regression metamodel to estimate its parameters, and a simple decision process to specify component reliability thresholds which ensure that the ammunition is mission effective. We present this article as an example of the integration of discrete event dynamic system analysis within a decision process. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael P. Bailey & Marcelo C. Bartroli & Keebom Kang & Alexander J. Callahan, 1992. "Establishing Reliability Goals for Naval Major‐Caliber Ammunition," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 877-892, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:39:y:1992:i:7:p:877-892
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199212)39:73.0.CO;2-D
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199212)39:73.0.CO;2-D
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199212)39:73.0.CO;2-D?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. G. Shanthikumar & R. G. Sargent, 1983. "A Unifying View of Hybrid Simulation/Analytic Models and Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1030-1052, December.
    2. S. S. Lavenberg & P. D. Welch, 1981. "A Perspective on the Use of Control Variables to Increase the Efficiency of Monte Carlo Simulations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 322-335, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, M.M. & Wang, Qunwei & Zhou, Dequn & Ding, H., 2019. "Evaluating uncertain investment decisions in low-carbon transition toward renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 1049-1060.
    2. Zhang, M.M. & Zhou, D.Q. & Zhou, P. & Chen, H.T., 2017. "Optimal design of subsidy to stimulate renewable energy investments: The case of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 873-883.
    3. Richard E. Nance & Robert G. Sargent, 2002. "Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 161-172, February.
    4. Boyle, Phelim & Broadie, Mark & Glasserman, Paul, 1997. "Monte Carlo methods for security pricing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 21(8-9), pages 1267-1321, June.
    5. Khamdamov, T., 2022. "A brief overview of the evolution of computer simulations in economic research," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 189-207.
    6. Mingming Zhang & Dequn Zhou & Hao Ding & Jingliang Jin, 2016. "Biomass Power Generation Investment in China: A Real Options Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Assereto, Martina & Byrne, Julie, 2021. "No real option for solar in Ireland: A real option valuation of utility scale solar investment in Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    8. Brailsford, Sally C. & Eldabi, Tillal & Kunc, Martin & Mustafee, Navonil & Osorio, Andres F., 2019. "Hybrid simulation modelling in operational research: A state-of-the-art review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 721-737.
    9. Tsai, Shing Chih, 2011. "Selecting the best simulated system with weighted control-variate estimators," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 705-717.
    10. Tsai, Shing Chih & Chu, I-Hao, 2012. "Controlled multistage selection procedures for comparison with a standard," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 709-721.
    11. Kenneth W. Bauer & James R. Wilson, 1992. "Control‐variate selection criteria," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 307-321, April.
    12. Grant, Floyd H. & Solberg, James J., 1983. "Variance reduction techniques in stochastic shortest route analysis: application procedures and results," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 366-375.
    13. Lai, Yi-Ling & Ishizaka, Alessio, 2020. "The application of multi-criteria decision analysis methods into talent identification process: A social psychological perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 637-647.
    14. Shing Chih Tsai & Chen Hao Kuo, 2012. "Screening and selection procedures with control variates and correlation induction techniques," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(5), pages 340-361, August.
    15. Russell Davidson & James G. Mackinnon, 1990. "Regression-Based Methods for Using Control and Antithetic Variates in Monte Carlo Experiments," Working Paper 781, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    16. Bilge Bilgen & Yelda Çelebi, 2013. "Integrated production scheduling and distribution planning in dairy supply chain by hybrid modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 55-82, December.
    17. Barry L. Nelson, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Stochastic Simulation Research in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 855-868, July.
    18. Amano, Tomoyuki & Taniguchi, Masanobu, 2011. "Control variate method for stationary processes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 165(1), pages 20-29.
    19. Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira & Dara G. Schniederjans & Eduardo Kunzel Teixeira, 2024. "Control variable use and reporting in operations management: a systematic literature review and revisit," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1809-1839, September.
    20. Sudip Bhattacharjee & Hong Zhang & R. Ramesh & Dee H. Andrews, 2007. "A Decomposition and Guided Simulation Methodology for Large-Scale System Design: A Study in QoS-Capable Intranets with Fixed and Mobile Components," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 429-442, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:39:y:1992:i:7:p:877-892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.