IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v50y2002i1p161-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Richard E. Nance

    (Department of Computer Science and Systems Research Center, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060)

  • Robert G. Sargent

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244)

Abstract

Simulation is introduced in terms of its different forms and uses, but the focus on discrete event modeling for systems analysis is dominant as it has been during the evolution of the technique within operations research and the management sciences. This evolutionary trace of over almost fifty years notes the importance of bidirectional influences with computer science, probability and statistics, and mathematics. No area within the scope of operations research and the management sciences has been affected more by advances in computing technology than simulation. This assertion is affirmed in the review of progress in those technical areas that collectively define the art and science of simulation. A holistic description of the field must include the roles of professional societies, conferences and symposia, and publications. The closing citation of a scientific value judgment from over 30 years in the past hopefully provides a stimulus for contemplating what lies ahead in the next 50 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard E. Nance & Robert G. Sargent, 2002. "Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 161-172, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:50:y:2002:i:1:p:161-172
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.50.1.161.17790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.50.1.161.17790
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.50.1.161.17790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard K. Nance, 1971. "On Time Flow Mechanisms for Discrete System Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 59-73, September.
    2. Robert G. Sargent, 1988. "Event Graph Modelling for Simulation with an Application to Flexible Manufacturing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(10), pages 1231-1251, October.
    3. R. W. Conway, 1963. "Some Tactical Problems in Digital Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 47-61, October.
    4. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    5. J. G. Shanthikumar & R. G. Sargent, 1983. "A Unifying View of Hybrid Simulation/Analytic Models and Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1030-1052, December.
    6. Thomas H. Naylor & J. M. Finger, 1967. "Verification of Computer Simulation Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 92-101, October.
    7. Robert S. Sargent & Keebom Kang & David Goldsman, 1992. "An Investigation of Finite-Sample Behavior of Confidence Interval Estimators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 898-913, October.
    8. Tapas K. Som & Robert G. Sargent, 1989. "A Formal Development of Event Graphs as an Aid to Structured and Efficient Simulation Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 107-125, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Chica & Joaquín Bautista & Jesica de Armas, 2019. "Benefits of robust multiobjective optimization for flexible automotive assembly line balancing," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 75-103, March.
    2. S J E Taylor & T Eldabi & G Riley & R J Paul & M Pidd, 2009. "Simulation modelling is 50! Do we need a reality check?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 69-82, May.
    3. Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng & William Benjamin Haskell, 2022. "A Multilevel Simulation Optimization Approach for Quantile Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 569-585, January.
    4. Jahangirian, Mohsen & Eldabi, Tillal & Naseer, Aisha & Stergioulas, Lampros K. & Young, Terry, 2010. "Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Shaler Stidham, 2002. "Analysis, Design, and Control of Queueing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 197-216, February.
    6. Juan, Angel A. & Faulin, Javier & Grasman, Scott E. & Rabe, Markus & Figueira, Gonçalo, 2015. "A review of simheuristics: Extending metaheuristics to deal with stochastic combinatorial optimization problems," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 62-72.
    7. S Robinson, 2005. "Discrete-event simulation: from the pioneers to the present, what next?," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 619-629, June.
    8. Barry L. Nelson, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Stochastic Simulation Research in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 855-868, July.
    9. Xi Chen & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2016. "Efficient VaR and CVaR Measurement via Stochastic Kriging," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 629-644, November.
    10. K. Vela Velupillai & Stefano Zambelli, 2010. "The Epistemology of Simulation, Computation and Dynamics in Economics Ennobling Synergies, Enfeebling 'Perfection'," ASSRU Discussion Papers 1002, ASSRU - Algorithmic Social Science Research Unit.
    11. B W Hollocks, 2006. "Forty years of discrete-event simulation—a personal reflection," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(12), pages 1383-1399, December.
    12. Robinson, Stewart & Radnor, Zoe J. & Burgess, Nicola & Worthington, Claire, 2012. "SimLean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 188-197.
    13. Alberto Ferreira Pereira, 2011. "Evaluating The Performance Of An Agv Fleet In An Fms Under Minimizing Part Movement And Balancing Workload Rules," Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, ISEG, Universidade de Lisboa, vol. 0(2), pages 79-96.
    14. Thomas W. Lucas & W. David Kelton & Paul J. Sánchez & Susan M. Sanchez & Ben L. Anderson, 2015. "Changing the paradigm: Simulation, now a method of first resort," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 293-303, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ricki G. Ingalls & Douglas J. Morrice & Enver Yücesan & Andrew B. Whinston, 2003. "Execution Conditions: A Formalization of Event Cancellation in Simulation Graphs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 397-411, November.
    2. Sheldon H. Jacobson & Enver Yücesan, 1999. "On the Complexity of Verifying Structural Properties of Discrete Event Simulation Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 476-481, June.
    3. Barry L. Nelson, 2004. "50th Anniversary Article: Stochastic Simulation Research in Management Science," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(7), pages 855-868, July.
    4. Eric L. Savage & Lee W. Schruben & Enver Yücesan, 2005. "On the Generality of Event-Graph Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 3-9, February.
    5. Halkos, George & Kevork, Ilias, 2002. "Confidence intervals in stationary autocorrelated time series," MPRA Paper 31840, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Enver Yücesan & Lee Schruben, 1998. "Complexity of Simulation Models: A Graph Theoretic Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 94-106, February.
    7. Halkos, George & Kevork, Ilias, 2006. "Estimating population means in covariance stationary process," MPRA Paper 31843, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    9. Pat-Anthony Federico & Paul W. Figliozzi, 1981. "Computer Simulation of Social Systems," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 9(4), pages 513-533, May.
    10. Leroudier, Jacques & Parent, Michel, 1979. "Discrete event simulation modelling of computer systems for performance evaluation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 50-79.
    11. S Robinson, 2008. "Conceptual modelling for simulation Part II: a framework for conceptual modelling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(3), pages 291-304, March.
    12. Christopher J Lynch & Saikou Y Diallo & Hamdi Kavak & Jose J Padilla, 2020. "A content analysis-based approach to explore simulation verification and identify its current challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-33, May.
    13. Katarzyna Growiec & Jakub Growiec & Bogumil Kaminski, 2017. "Social Network Structure and The Trade-Off Between Social Utility and Economic Performance," KAE Working Papers 2017-026, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis.
    14. Acharki, Naoufal & Bertoncello, Antoine & Garnier, Josselin, 2023. "Robust prediction interval estimation for Gaussian processes by cross-validation method," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Giorgio Fagiolo & Mattia Guerini & Francesco Lamperti & Alessio Moneta & Andrea Roventini, 2017. "Validation of Agent-Based Models in Economics and Finance," LEM Papers Series 2017/23, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    16. H. Christopher Frey & Sumeet R. Patil, 2002. "Identification and Review of Sensitivity Analysis Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 553-578, June.
    17. Tunali, S. & Batmaz, I., 2003. "A metamodeling methodology involving both qualitative and quantitative input factors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(2), pages 437-450, October.
    18. Jacques Fontanel, 1982. "Introduction. Military expenditures and Economic Growth (France, Morocco)," Post-Print hal-03264692, HAL.
    19. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    20. Robertson, Joseph J. & Polly, Ben J. & Collis, Jon M., 2015. "Reduced-order modeling and simulated annealing optimization for efficient residential building utility bill calibration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 169-177.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:50:y:2002:i:1:p:161-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.