IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/natres/v38y2014i2p109-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natural food resources bank in the form of forestry and grassland: Scenarios to ensure sustainable food security

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbiao Wu
  • Yixing Yang
  • Charles S. Brennan
  • Wei Huang

Abstract

An evaluation was conducted to establish the feasibility of a Natural Food Resources Bank (NFRB), in the form of forestry or grassland, to achieve both continuous food production and an accumulation of primary nutrients in living perennial plants. The development of an NFRB protects our living environment from deterioration (especially soil erosion) by increasing the surface coverage of the world's land, even in mountainous areas. Additionally a functioning NFRB enhances food sustainably and security, representing a tangible and renewable food resource production system. Research has identified the prospects of cultivating the NFRB in the form of forestry and also grassland. The review investigated the distinct differences of an NFRB from a range of approaches and discusses the environmental advantage and feasibility of cultivating NFRB. The ability of the NFRB to realize sustainable food resources production for ensuring food security is evaluated in terms of environmental and economical feasibility. A NFRB can attenuate climatic change by increasing CO2 absorption and fixation. It is worth considering the replacement of the annual food production system by the NFRB (especially in steeplands) in environmental law, and replacing the policy of maintaining annual food reserves by the NFRB in food security policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbiao Wu & Yixing Yang & Charles S. Brennan & Wei Huang, 2014. "Natural food resources bank in the form of forestry and grassland: Scenarios to ensure sustainable food security," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 38(2), pages 109-117, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:38:y:2014:i:2:p:109-117
    DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12039
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1477-8947.12039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiniry, James R. & Bean, Brent & Xie, Yun & Chen, Pei-yu, 2004. "Maize yield potential: critical processes and simulation modeling in a high-yielding environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 45-56, October.
    2. Allen B. Paul, 1970. "The Pricing of Binspace—A Contribution to the Theory of Storage," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 52(1), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Čerkasova, Natalja & White, Michael & Arnold, Jeffrey & Bieger, Katrin & Allen, Peter & Gao, Jungang & Gambone, Marilyn & Meki, Manyowa & Kiniry, James & Gassman, Philip W., 2023. "Field scale SWAT+ modeling of corn and soybean yields for the contiguous United States: National Agroecosystem Model Development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Zhou, Wei, 2015. "Three essays on modeling biofuel feedstock supply," ISU General Staff Papers 201501010800005728, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Folberth, Christian & Yang, Hong & Gaiser, Thomas & Abbaspour, Karim C. & Schulin, Rainer, 2013. "Modeling maize yield responses to improvement in nutrient, water and cultivar inputs in sub-Saharan Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 22-34.
    4. Colin A. Carter & Gordon C. Rausser & Aaron Smith, 2017. "Commodity Storage and the Market Effects of Biofuel Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(4), pages 1027-1055.
    5. Bhattarai, Mukesh Dev & Secchi, Silvia & Schoof, Justin, 2017. "Projecting corn and soybeans yields under climate change in a Corn Belt watershed," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 90-99.
    6. Dobrolyubova, Elena (Добролюбова, Елена), 2018. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Delegated Powers [Оценка Результативности И Эффективности Переданных Полномочий]," Working Papers 041839, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    7. Zhu, Xiaohong, 2016. "New models to estimate costs of US farm programs," ISU General Staff Papers 201601010800006209, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Mario J. Miranda & Joseph W. Glauber, 2022. "A model of asynchronous bi‐hemispheric production in global agricultural commodity markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 812-830, March.
    9. Singh, Pritpal & Sandhu, Amarjeet Singh, 2023. "Energy budgeting and economics of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivation under different sowing methods in north-western India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Liu, Hsiang-Hsi, 1983. "An annual simultaneous equation econometric model of U.S. corn and soybean cash and futures markets," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800009935, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Tatsumi, Kenichi, 2016. "Effects of automatic multi-objective optimization of crop models on corn yield reproducibility in the U.S.A," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 322(C), pages 124-137.
    12. Zhu, Xiaohong, 2016. "New models to estimate costs of US farm programs," ISU General Staff Papers 3547, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Irwin, Scott H., 2020. "Trilogy for troubleshooting convergence: Manipulation, structural imbalance, and storage rates," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    14. Zulauf, Carl & Kim, Sanghyo, 2020. "U.S. Market Net Return and Risk to Storing Corn and Soybeans, 1974–2017," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2020.
    15. Tibor Zsigmond & Péter Braun & János Mészáros & István Waltner & Ágota Horel, 2022. "Investigating Plant Response to Soil Characteristics and Slope Positions in a Small Catchment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Bobenrieth Eugenio S.A. & Bobenrieth Juan R.A. & Wright Brian D., 2012. "Strict Concavity of the Value Function for a Family of Dynamic Accumulation Models," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:natres:v:38:y:2014:i:2:p:109-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-8947 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.