IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v43y2022i3p681-695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In‐store service decisions under consumer disappointment aversion

Author

Listed:
  • Junbin Wang

Abstract

This study investigates how retailers invest in‐store service by considering the possible service failure that occurs in a store, and consumers' disappointment concerns it causes. Specifically, we establish an analytical framework to examine several competitive scenarios. The results reveal that, first, the presence of disappointment concerns always decreases the in‐store service level in equilibrium, while ignoring it by retailers may result in their overinvestments in in‐store service. Although conventional wisdom may suggest offering more in‐store service to consumers helps the traditional retailer compete with online rivals, this may not be true in the presence of disappointment aversion.

Suggested Citation

  • Junbin Wang, 2022. "In‐store service decisions under consumer disappointment aversion," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 681-695, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:681-695
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3411
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1991. "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 106(4), pages 1039-1061.
    2. Rose, Susan & Clark, Moira & Samouel, Phillip & Hair, Neil, 2012. "Online Customer Experience in e-Retailing: An empirical model of Antecedents and Outcomes," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 308-322.
    3. Ding, Yi & Gao, Xing & Huang, Chao & Shu, Jia & Yang, Donghui, 2018. "Service competition in an online duopoly market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 58-72.
    4. Yan, Ruiliang & Pei, Zhi, 2009. "Retail services and firm profit in a dual-channel market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 306-314.
    5. Wen Zhang & Yi He, 2020. "Optimal advance selling discount strategy with future‐oriented consumers," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 308-320, April.
    6. Yan Dong & Kefeng Xu & Tony Haitao Cui & Yuliang Yao, 2015. "Service Failure Recovery and Prevention: Managing Stockouts in Distribution Channels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 689-701, September.
    7. Rachel R. Chen & Eitan Gerstner & Yinghui (Catherine) Yang, 2012. "Customer Bill of Rights Under No-Fault Service Failure: Confinement and Compensation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 157-171, January.
    8. Francioni, Barbara & Savelli, Elisabetta & Cioppi, Marco, 2018. "Store satisfaction and store loyalty: The moderating role of store atmosphere," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 333-341.
    9. Du, Shaofu & Wang, Li & Hu, Li, 2019. "Omnichannel management with consumer disappointment aversion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 84-101.
    10. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Gul, Faruk, 1991. "A Theory of Disappointment Aversion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 667-686, May.
    12. Yusen Xia & Tiaojun Xiao & G. Peter Zhang, 2019. "Service Investment and Channel Structure Decisions in Competing Supply Chains," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 57-74, March.
    13. J. Jeffrey Inman & James S. Dyer & Jianmin Jia, 1997. "A Generalized Utility Model of Disappointment and Regret Effects on Post-Choice Valuation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 97-111.
    14. David E. Bell, 1985. "Disappointment in Decision Making Under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Ganesh Iyer & Dmitri Kuksov, 2012. "Competition in Consumer Shopping Experience," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 913-933, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jong-Hee Hahn & Jinwoo Kim & Sang-Hyun Kim & Jihong Lee, 2018. "Price discrimination with loss averse consumers," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 65(3), pages 681-728, May.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:6:p:1324-1369 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Aurélien Baillon & Han Bleichrodt & Vitalie Spinu, 2020. "Searching for the Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 93-112, January.
    4. Achilleas Vassilopoulos & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Rodolfo M. Nayga, 2024. "Reference dependence, expectations and anchoring in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 97(4), pages 637-683, December.
    5. Carlos Laciana & Elke Weber, 2008. "Correcting expected utility for comparisons between alternative outcomes: A unified parameterization of regret and disappointment," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Wenner, Lukas M., 2015. "Expected prices as reference points—Theory and experiments," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 60-79.
    7. Fabian Herweg & Daniel Muller & Philipp Weinschenk, 2010. "Binary Payment Schemes: Moral Hazard and Loss Aversion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(5), pages 2451-2477, December.
    8. Sudeep Bhatia & Graham Loomes & Daniel Read, 2021. "Establishing the laws of preferential choice behavior," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(6), pages 1324-1369, November.
    9. Rosato, Antonio & Tymula, Agnieszka A., 2019. "Loss aversion and competition in Vickrey auctions: Money ain't no good," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 188-208.
    10. Ho, Hoa, 2021. "Loss Aversion, Moral Hazard, and Stochastic Contracts," Discussion Papers in Economics 75307, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    11. Seunghee Han & Jooyong Jun & Eunjung Yeo, 2021. "In Pursuit of Sustainable Mobile Policy: A Study of Consumer Tariff Preferences under Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Grillo, Edoardo, 2016. "The hidden cost of raising voters’ expectations: Reference dependence and politicians’ credibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 126-143.
    13. Herweg, Fabian & Müller, Daniel, 2008. "The Optimality of Simple Contracts: Moral Hazard and Loss Aversion," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 17/2008, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    14. Wenhui Zhou & Dongmei Wang & Weixiang Huang & Pengfei Guo, 2021. "To Pool or Not to Pool? The Effect of Loss Aversion on Queue Configurations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4258-4272, November.
    15. Zhihua Li & Songfa Zhong, 2023. "Reference Dependence in Intertemporal Preference," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 475-490, January.
    16. Antonio Rosato, 2016. "Selling substitute goods to loss-averse consumers: limited availability, bargains, and rip-offs," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(3), pages 709-733, August.
    17. Jianqiang Zhang & Krista J. Li, 2021. "Quality Disclosure Under Consumer Loss Aversion," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 5052-5069, August.
    18. Botond Kőszegi & Matthew Rabin, 2006. "A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(4), pages 1133-1165.
    19. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.
    20. Shen, Yinhai & Zhang, Qing & Zhang, Zhichao & Ma, Xinyu, 2022. "Omnichannel retailing return operations with consumer disappointment aversion," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    21. Abdellaoui, Mohammed & Bleichrodt, Han, 2007. "Eliciting Gul's theory of disappointment aversion by the tradeoff method," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 631-645, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:43:y:2022:i:3:p:681-695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.