IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i1-2p217-228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients’ and parents’ perspectives of and experiences with assessing nursing students’ paediatric clinical practice

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Balasa
  • Julie Chartrand
  • Katherine Moreau
  • Kelley Tousignant
  • Kaylee Eady

Abstract

Purpose To explore patients’ and parents’ involvement in the formative assessment of undergraduate nursing students’ paediatric clinical practice. Methods We conducted semi‐structured interviews with paediatric patients between 14 to 18 years old and parents who received care from a nursing student while admitted to a paediatric tertiary care hospital in Canada. We analysed the data using qualitative content analysis as well as Lincoln and Guba's criteria for establishing trustworthiness. The Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) checklist was completed for the quality appraisal of this article. Findings Three categories emerged from the data: 1) how patients and parents are currently involved in the formative assessment of nursing students’ paediatric clinical practice; 2) how patients and parents would prefer to be involved in the formative assessment of nursing students’ paediatric clinical practice; and 3) the potential benefits and challenges of involving patients and parents in the formative assessment of nursing students’ paediatric clinical practice. Conclusion This study provided an understanding of patients’ and parents’ past encounters with nursing students and the elements of care that they have assessed as well as those that they would prefer to assess and provide feedback on, while considering the potential benefits and challenges of their involvement. The findings of this study will assist clinical instructors in determining how and when to involve patients and parents in the assessment of nursing students. Academic institutions offering nursing programmes should consider the study findings when improving or changing formative assessment strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Balasa & Julie Chartrand & Katherine Moreau & Kelley Tousignant & Kaylee Eady, 2021. "Patients’ and parents’ perspectives of and experiences with assessing nursing students’ paediatric clinical practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 217-228, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:1-2:p:217-228
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15544
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elaine Haycock‐Stuart & Eddie Donaghy & Chris Darbyshire, 2016. "Involving users and carers in the assessment of preregistration nursing students' clinical nursing practice: a strategy for patient empowerment and quality improvement?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 2052-2065, July.
    2. Satu Elo & Maria Kääriäinen & Outi Kanste & Tarja Pölkki & Kati Utriainen & Helvi Kyngäs, 2014. "Qualitative Content Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harpreet Sohal & Lisa Huddlestone & Elena Ratschen, 2016. "Preparing for Completely Smoke-Free Mental Health Settings: Findings on Patient Smoking, Resources Spent Facilitating Smoking Breaks, and the Role of Smoking in Reported Incidents from a Large Mental ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Pernille Maria Wodskou & Sasha Maria Reinhardt & Marie Borring Andersen & Stig Molsted & Lone Helle Schou, 2021. "Motivation, Barriers, and Suggestions for Intradialytic Exercise—A Qualitative Study among Patients and Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Moritz Böhmecke‐Schwafert & Marie Wehinger & Robin Teigland, 2022. "Blockchain for the circular economy: Theorizing blockchain's role in the transition to a circular economy through an empirical investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(8), pages 3786-3801, December.
    4. Perello-Marin, M Rosario & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Raúl & Alfaro-Saiz, Juan-Jose, 2022. "Analysing GRI reports for the disclosure of SDG contribution in European car manufacturers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Xiaomei Wang & Andrew South & Brett Hashimoto & Clifton Farnsworth, 2024. "Six Connotations of Sustainability in Civil and Construction Engineering: A Corpus Linguistics Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Leah M. Haverhals, 2022. "How Social Determinants of Health of Individuals Living or Working in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Home-Based Long-Term Care Programs in Puerto Rico Influenced Recovery after Hurricane Maria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-19, October.
    7. David Mhlanga, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence in the Industry 4.0, and Its Impact on Poverty, Innovation, Infrastructure Development, and the Sustainable Development Goals: Lessons from Emerging Economies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Rafaela Garbelini Anuardo & Maximilian Espuny & Ana Carolina Ferreira Costa & Ana Lígia Gil Espuny & Yiğit Kazançoğlu & Jayakrishna Kandsamy & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2023. "Transforming E-Waste into Opportunities: Driving Organizational Actions to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Ernesto Antonini & Jacopo Gaspari & Cristina Visconti, 2021. "Collaborative Learning Experiences in a Changing Environment: Innovative Educational Approaches in Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    10. Pajaree Ackaradejruangsri & Atthaphon Mumi & Sirirat Rattanapituk & Pijak Pakhunwanich, 2023. "Exploring the Determinants of Young Inclusive Leadership in Thailand: Research Taxonomy and Theoretical Framework," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 3696-3723, December.
    11. Maribel Blasco, 2022. "“We’re Just Geeks”: Disciplinary Identifications Among Business Students and Their Implications for Personal Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 279-302, June.
    12. Zakrzewska-Bielawska, Agnieszka & Czakon, Wojciech & Kraus, Sascha, 2023. "Relational orientation in B2B strategies: Measurement scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:1-2:p:217-228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.