IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i19-20p3641-3650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who is in charge of the care of patients with acute abdominal pain? An interview study with managers across the acute care chain

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Tegelberg
  • Eva Jangland
  • Claes Juhlin
  • Åsa Muntlin Athlin

Abstract

Aim and objectives To describe managers' perspectives on the care of patients with acute abdominal pain and explore how they influence the care. Background Patients with acute abdominal pain form a common group of patients who often report poor pain management. Managers are key actors in ensuring that patients receive high‐quality care. This stresses the need to deepen the understanding of their perspectives on these patients, in order to provide high‐quality fundamental care across the acute care chain. Design Qualitative descriptive semi‐structured interview study, with an inductive approach. The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) was used. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with managers (n = 17) from ambulance services, emergency departments and surgical departments at four hospitals in Sweden, representing managers at the micro‐ and macrolevels across the acute care chain. Results The patient group was described as a challenging heterogeneous group, with a focus on medical care, shaped by clinical practice guidelines, for which others were responsible. Managers with a physician background expressed that nursing care was important for the outcome of the care, while managers with a nursing background focused solely on the medical care. Additionally, the managers described that they affected the care by providing resources and serving as role models. Conclusions The solely medical perspective is worrying. By being a stakeholder, the managers' responsibility should be to highlight the patient perspective in the care and promote and support all health professionals in redesigning the care, where achieving higher quality both in nursing and in medical care for patients with acute abdominal pain becomes a shared goal. Relevance to clinical practice Managers should use their leadership to bridge the gap between medicine and nursing care by highlighting patients' need for fundamental care, and to support health professionals in providing evidence‐based and high‐quality care.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Tegelberg & Eva Jangland & Claes Juhlin & Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2019. "Who is in charge of the care of patients with acute abdominal pain? An interview study with managers across the acute care chain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3641-3650, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3641-3650
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14962
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14962
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14962?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inger Jansson & Anna Forsberg, 2016. "How do nurses and ward managers perceive that evidence‐based sources are obtained to inform relevant nursing interventions? – an exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 769-776, March.
    2. Helen Schultz & Niels Qvist & Christian B Mogensen & Birthe D Pedersen, 2014. "Discharge from an emergency department observation unit and a surgical assessment unit: experiences of patients with acute abdominal pain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2779-2789, October.
    3. Eva Jangland & Therese Teodorsson & Karin Molander & Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2018. "Inadequate environment, resources and values lead to missed nursing care: A focused ethnographic study on the surgical ward using the Fundamentals of Care framework," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2311-2321, June.
    4. Helen Schultz & Niels Qvist & Christian B Mogensen & Birthe D Pedersen, 2014. "Perspectives of patients with acute abdominal pain in an emergency department observation unit and a surgical assessment unit: a prospective comparative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3218-3229, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie‐Louise Södersved Källestedt & Margareta Asp & Anna Letterstål & Margareta Widarsson, 2020. "Perceptions of managers regarding prerequisites for the development of professional competence of newly graduated nurses: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4784-4794, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nina Halberg & Lone Assafi & Vibeke Nørholm, 2021. "Understandings of and experiences with evidence‐based practice in practice among nurses in a surgical department: A constructivist approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 488-498, February.
    2. Eva Jangland & Therese Teodorsson & Karin Molander & Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2018. "Inadequate environment, resources and values lead to missed nursing care: A focused ethnographic study on the surgical ward using the Fundamentals of Care framework," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2311-2321, June.
    3. Debra Jackson & Olga Kozlowska, 2018. "Fundamental care—the quest for evidence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2177-2178, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:19-20:p:3641-3650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.