IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i21-22p3218-3229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of patients with acute abdominal pain in an emergency department observation unit and a surgical assessment unit: a prospective comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Schultz
  • Niels Qvist
  • Christian B Mogensen
  • Birthe D Pedersen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate the patient perspective when admitted with acute abdominal pain to an emergency department observation unit compared with the perspective when admitted to a surgical assessment unit. Background An increase in emergency department observation units has led to more short‐term admissions and has changed the patient journey from admission to specialised wards staffed by specialist nurses to stays in units staffed by emergency nurses. Design A comparative field study. Methods The study included 21 patients. Participant observation and qualitative interviews were performed, and the analyses were phenomenological–hermeneutic. Results Emergency department observation unit patients had extensive interaction with health professionals, which could create distrust. Surgical assessment unit patients experienced lack of interaction with nurses, also creating distrust. Emergency department observation unit patients had more encounters with fellow patients than the surgical assessment unit patients did, which was beneficial when needing assistance, but disturbing when needing rest. The limited contact with other patients in the surgical assessment unit revealed the opposite effect. In both units, there was nonpersonalised care, making it difficult for patients to make informed decisions. Conclusion The multibedded rooms in the emergency department observation unit had a positive influence on patient–nurse interaction, but a negative influence on privacy; the opposite was found in the surgical assessment unit with its rooms with fewer beds. The extensive professional–patient interactions in the emergency department observation unit created distrust. The limited professional–patient interaction in the surgical assessment unit did the same. That the emergency department observation unit was staffed by emergency nurses seemed to have a positive influence on the length of patient–nurse interactions, while the surgical assessment unit staffed by specialist nurses seemed to have the opposite effect. There was lack of information and personalised care in both units. Relevance to clinical practice Units receiving acute patients need to provide personalised care and information about how the unit functions and about care and treatment to improve the patients' ability to make decisions during admission.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Schultz & Niels Qvist & Christian B Mogensen & Birthe D Pedersen, 2014. "Perspectives of patients with acute abdominal pain in an emergency department observation unit and a surgical assessment unit: a prospective comparative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3218-3229, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3218-3229
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12570
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Tegelberg & Eva Jangland & Claes Juhlin & Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2019. "Who is in charge of the care of patients with acute abdominal pain? An interview study with managers across the acute care chain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3641-3650, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:21-22:p:3218-3229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.