IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i5-6p769-776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do nurses and ward managers perceive that evidence‐based sources are obtained to inform relevant nursing interventions? – an exploratory study

Author

Listed:
  • Inger Jansson
  • Anna Forsberg

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how nurses and managers perceive that evidence‐based sources are obtained to inform relevant nursing interventions. Background Implementation of evidence‐based practice requires a systematic search and evaluation of research, clinical expertise and consideration of the patients’ preferences and values. Much has been written over the past decade about how this should be done and nurses’ mandatory education has provided them with the necessary tools to work in this way. In spite of this, nurses do not provide evidence‐based practice on a regular basis. Many of the barriers against evidence‐based practice are dependent on contextual factors. Therefore, it can be of interest to study both managers and nurses. Design This qualitative study has an explorative and retrospective design. Method Interviews were conducted with 15 participants, including eight nurses, four ward managers, two operation managers and one care developer. Directed content analysis was used. Result Nurses and managers had different approaches towards the use of scientific knowledge. Nurses’ use of clinical experience and learning from each other was common. Nurses’ work as facilitators was structured by managers. Not involving the patient in the care was common among the nurses. Conclusion The parts of evidence‐based practice that are supported by the managers are also used by the nurses. When use of research is not controlled by the managers, the nurses do not search for scientific research. Neither is the patients’ involvement in decision‐making obvious. Relevance to clinical practice A change in nurses’ attitudes to scientific knowledge and perception of patient participation is needed. For this to happen, nurses need managers with a strong interest in evidence‐based practice that support successful implementation of research in everyday clinical practise.

Suggested Citation

  • Inger Jansson & Anna Forsberg, 2016. "How do nurses and ward managers perceive that evidence‐based sources are obtained to inform relevant nursing interventions? – an exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 769-776, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:769-776
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Halberg & Lone Assafi & Vibeke Nørholm, 2021. "Understandings of and experiences with evidence‐based practice in practice among nurses in a surgical department: A constructivist approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 488-498, February.
    2. Alexander Tegelberg & Eva Jangland & Claes Juhlin & Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2019. "Who is in charge of the care of patients with acute abdominal pain? An interview study with managers across the acute care chain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3641-3650, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:769-776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.