IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v30y2021i3-4p488-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understandings of and experiences with evidence‐based practice in practice among nurses in a surgical department: A constructivist approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Halberg
  • Lone Assafi
  • Vibeke Nørholm

Abstract

Aim and objectives To explore nurses’ constructions of the concept of evidence‐based practice through their understandings of and experiences with evidence‐based practice in a clinical care setting. Background The primary purpose of evidence‐based practice is high‐quality patient outcomes. However, the adoption of evidence‐based practice is described as a complex process, and research shows that evidence‐based practice is not translated into practice. Research often explores facilitators and barriers of implementing and adopting evidence‐based practice. Yet there is limited knowledge on how nurses construct the concept in practice. Design This study has a constructivist approach and follows COREQ guidelines. Method Ten semi‐structured interviews with 26 nurses were conducted in 2019. Data were analysed with an emic and inductive approach. Results Three key constructions emerged. Understandings of evidence‐based practice were based on the original concept of evidence‐based medicine. This included the hierarchy of evidence which was perceived as an inflexible concept not encompassing the nursing care. However, while not using the term evidence‐based practice, the nurses were doing evidence‐based practice portrayed through outcomes from management‐supported nursing‐based projects and incorporated reflections and discussions into weekly meetings. A discrepancy between a theoretical understanding and a practical doing of evidence‐based practice appeared and was especially evident when the nurses’ primary evidence sources consisted of the immediate options, for example asking colleagues or following accessible guidelines. Searching for evidence was central in their theoretical understanding but not an incorporated part of their daily work tasks. Conclusion The nurses’ constructions of evidence‐based practice indicate a discrepancy between the theoretical understanding of evidence‐based practice and the practical doing of evidence‐based practice, which hinders the basis of working according to the concept. Relevance to clinical practice Theoretical discussions of evidence‐based practice within the nursing field remain academic, as nurses in practice construct the concept on standards from evidence‐based medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Halberg & Lone Assafi & Vibeke Nørholm, 2021. "Understandings of and experiences with evidence‐based practice in practice among nurses in a surgical department: A constructivist approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 488-498, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:488-498
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15563
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inger Jansson & Anna Forsberg, 2016. "How do nurses and ward managers perceive that evidence‐based sources are obtained to inform relevant nursing interventions? – an exploratory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 769-776, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Tegelberg & Eva Jangland & Claes Juhlin & Åsa Muntlin Athlin, 2019. "Who is in charge of the care of patients with acute abdominal pain? An interview study with managers across the acute care chain," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3641-3650, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:30:y:2021:i:3-4:p:488-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.