IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i13-14p2553-2564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace incivility and its influence on professional quality of life among nurses from multicultural background: A cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry
  • Nahed Alquwez
  • Joseph Almazan
  • Ibrahim Mohammed Namis
  • Rainier C. Moreno‐Lacalle
  • Jonas Preposi Cruz

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To investigate the workplace incivility of nurses working in two Saudi hospitals and analyse its influence on the nurses’ professional quality of life (ProQOL). Background The prevalence and economic impact of workplace incivility cannot be overstated and disregarded. To the current authors’ knowledge, no extensive study on this topic has been conducted in Saudi Arabia. The influence of workplace incivility to ProQOL of nurses from different cultural backgrounds has never been thoroughly investigated. Design Descriptive, cross‐sectional design. Methods A sample of 378 nurses working in two government hospitals in Saudi Arabia were surveyed using the Nursing Incivility Scale and the ProQOL Scale version 5 from February to May 2018. A multivariate multiple regression analysis was conducted to analyse the multivariate effect of workplace incivility on the nurses’ ProQOL. The study adhered to the STROBE guideline (See Supporting Information File 1). Results The nurses perceived a moderate level of workplace incivility from the different sources of uncivil acts measured in this study. Among the five sources of incivility explored in this study, the nurses reported the majority of workplace incivility experienced from patients/visitors (M = 2.44, SD = 0.80), while the lowest was from supervisors (M = 1.90, SD = 0.66). The mean scores of the respondents in the compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress subscales were 36.50 (SD = 6.30), 26.43 (SD = 4.81) and 26.47 (SD = 6.06), respectively. General incivility, supervisor incivility, physician incivility and patient/visitor incivility showed a significant multivariate effect on the three ProQOL subscales. Conclusions Nurses’ experience of workplace civility and its sources were associated with ProQOL. Relevance to clinical practice. The findings of this study can be used as guide in establishing human resource policies towards achieving nurses’ needs, reducing workplace incivility and improving ProQOL.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan & Ibrahim Mohammed Namis & Rainier C. Moreno‐Lacalle & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Workplace incivility and its influence on professional quality of life among nurses from multicultural background: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2553-2564, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2553-2564
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14840
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna A. Gaffney & Rosanna F. DeMarco & Anne Hofmeyer & Judith A. Vessey & Wendy C. Budin, 2012. "Making Things Right: Nurses' Experiences with Workplace Bullying—A Grounded Theory," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2012, pages 1-10, April.
    2. Mohammad Alboliteeh & Judy Magarey & Richard Wiechula, 2017. "The Profile of Saudi Nursing Workforce: A Cross-Sectional Study," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-9, October.
    3. Seyyed Abolfazl Vagharseyyedin, 2016. "Nurses' perspectives on workplace mistreatment: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 70-78, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdualrahman Saeed Alshehry & Nahed Alquwez & Joseph Almazan & Ibrahim Mohammed Namis & Jonas Preposi Cruz, 2019. "Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4582-4594, December.
    2. Muhammad Rashid Ali & Badar Nadeem Ashraf & Chuanmin Shuai, 2019. "Teachers’ Conflict-Inducing Attitudes and Their Repercussions on Students’ Psychological Health and Learning Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fereshteh Najafi & Masoud Fallahi‐Khoshknab & Fazlollah Ahmadi & Asghar Dalvandi & Mehdi Rahgozar, 2017. "Human dignity and professional reputation under threat: Iranian Nurses' experiences of workplace violence," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 44-50, March.
    2. Nahed Alquwez & Jonas Preposi Cruz & Farhan Alshammari & Ebaa Marwan Felemban & Joseph U. Almazan & Regie B. Tumala & Hawa M. Alabdulaziz & Fatmah Alsolami & John Paul Ben T. Silang & Hanan M. M. Tork, 2019. "A multi‐university assessment of patient safety competence during clinical training among baccalaureate nursing students: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1771-1781, May.
    3. Susan L. Johnson, 2019. "Workplace bullying, biased behaviours and performance review in the nursing profession: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1528-1537, May.
    4. Declan Fahie & Gerry Dunne, 2021. "Standing by or Standing Up? —How Philosophy Can (In)form Our Understanding of Bystander Behaviours in Workplace Bullying Dynamics," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-10, March.
    5. Janki Shankar & Lun Li & Shawn Tan, 2021. "Work Experiences and Challenges to Employment Sustainability for People With Mental Illness in Supported Employment Programs," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    6. Kwisoon Choe & Sunman Kim & Chunbok Lee & Sunghee Kim, 2020. "Effect of Ethics Seminar on Moral Sensitivity and Ethical Behavior of Clinical Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Mike O'Driscoll & Helen Allan & Liang Liu & Kevin Corbett & Laura Serrant, 2018. "Compassion in practice—Evaluating the awareness, involvement and perceived impact of a national nursing and midwifery strategy amongst healthcare professionals in NHS Trusts in England," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1097-1109, March.
    8. Yael Livne & Ruhama Goussinsky, 2018. "Workplace bullying and burnout among healthcare employees: The moderating effect of control‐related resources," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 89-98, March.
    9. Reem AL-Dossary & Abdulilah Mohammad Mayet & Javed Khan Bhutto & Neeraj Kumar Shukla & Ehsan Nazemi & Ramy Mohammed Aiesh Qaisi, 2023. "Proposing a Method Based on Artificial Neural Network for Predicting Alignment between the Saudi Nursing Workforce and the Gig Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-12, August.
    10. Elsie Hepburn & Esther Daniel & Philip Onuoha, 2020. "Nurses’ Bullying Experiences: A Case study of a Caribbean Major Island Hospital," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2553-2564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.