IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i9-10p1969-1980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications among bedridden patients: A prospective multicentre study

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Li
  • Xinmei Zhou
  • Jing Cao
  • Zheng Li
  • Xia Wan
  • Jiaqian Li
  • Jing Jiao
  • Ge Liu
  • Ying Liu
  • Fangfang Li
  • Baoyun Song
  • Jingfen Jin
  • Yilan Liu
  • Xianxiu Wen
  • Shouzhen Cheng
  • Xinjuan Wu

Abstract

Aims and objectives To gain insight into nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications (pressure ulcers, pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis and urinary tract infections) and explore the correlation of nurses’ knowledge and attitudes with the incidence of these complications. Background Immobility complications have adverse consequences, and effective management requires appropriate knowledge, attitudes and skills. Evidence about nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding immobility complications is lacking. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods A total of 3,903 nurses and 21,333 bedridden patients from 25 hospitals in China were surveyed. Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications were assessed using researcher‐developed questionnaires. The content validity, reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaires were validated through expert review and a pilot study. The incidence of major immobility complications among bedridden patients from selected wards was surveyed by trained investigators. Correlations between knowledge, attitudes and the incidence of major immobility complications were evaluated with multilevel regression models. Results Mean knowledge scores were 64.07% for pressure ulcers, 72.92% for deep vein thrombosis, 76.54% for pneumonia and 83.30% for urinary tract infections. Mean attitude scores for these complications were 86.25%, 84.31%, 85.00% and 84.53%, respectively. Knowledge and attitude scores were significantly higher among nurses with older age, longer employment duration, higher education level, previous training experience and those working in tertiary hospitals or critical care units. Nurses’ knowledge about pressure ulcers was negatively related to the incidence of pressure ulcers, and attitude towards pneumonia was negatively correlated with the incidence of pneumonia. Conclusion Clinical nurses have relatively positive attitudes but inadequate knowledge regarding major immobility complications. Improved knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications may contribute to reducing these complications. Relevance to Clinical Practice Nursing managers should implement measures to improve nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications to reduce the incidence of these complications in bedridden patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Li & Xinmei Zhou & Jing Cao & Zheng Li & Xia Wan & Jiaqian Li & Jing Jiao & Ge Liu & Ying Liu & Fangfang Li & Baoyun Song & Jingfen Jin & Yilan Liu & Xianxiu Wen & Shouzhen Cheng & Xinjuan Wu, 2018. "Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications among bedridden patients: A prospective multicentre study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1969-1980, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:1969-1980
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14339
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silke Theisen & Anna Drabik & Stephanie Stock, 2012. "Pressure ulcers in older hospitalised patients and its impact on length of stay: a retrospective observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3‐4), pages 380-387, February.
    2. Liesbet Demarré & Katrien Vanderwee & Tom Defloor & Sofie Verhaeghe & Lisette Schoonhoven & Dimitri Beeckman, 2012. "Pressure ulcers: knowledge and attitude of nurses and nursing assistants in Belgian nursing homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1425-1434, May.
    3. Wendy Chaboyer & Brigid M. Gillespie, 2014. "Understanding nurses' views on a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a first step towards successful implementation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3415-3423, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu Wang & Xin‐Juan Wu & Yu‐Fen Ma & Yuan Xu & Xiao‐Jie Wang & Chen Zhu & Jing Cao & Jing Jiao & Ge Liu & Zhen Li & Ying Liu & Li‐Yun Zhu, 2021. "Chinese orthopaedic nurses' knowledge, attitude and venous thromboembolic prophylactic practices: A multicentric cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 773-782, March.
    2. Ling Jiang & Li Li & Lisa Lommel, 2020. "Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours related to pressure injury prevention: A large‐scale cross‐sectional survey in mainland China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3311-3324, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharon Latimer & Wendy Chaboyer & Lukman Thalib & Elizabeth McInnes & Tracey Bucknall & Brigid M. Gillespie, 2019. "Pressure injury prevalence and predictors among older adults in the first 36 hours of hospitalisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 4119-4127, November.
    2. Ami Hommel & Lena Gunningberg & Ewa Idvall & Carina Bååth, 2017. "Successful factors to prevent pressure ulcers – an interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 182-189, January.
    3. Dorothy Li Bai & Tsai-Wen Liu & Hsiu-Ling Chou & Yeh-Liang Hsu, 2020. "Relationship between a pressure redistributing foam mattress and pressure injuries: An observational prospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Sriyani A. Kumarasinghe & Priyadarshika Hettiarachchi & Sudharshani Wasalathanthri, 2018. "Nurses' knowledge on diabetic foot ulcer disease and their attitudes towards patients affected: A cross‐sectional institution‐based study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 203-212, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:1969-1980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.