IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i23-24p3415-3423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding nurses' views on a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a first step towards successful implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Chaboyer
  • Brigid M. Gillespie

Abstract

Aims and Objectives To explore nurses' views of the barriers and facilitators to the use of a newly devised patient‐centred pressure ulcer prevention care bundle. Background Given pressure ulcer prevention strategies are not implemented consistently, the use of a pressure ulcer care bundle may improve implementation given bundles generally assist in standardising care. Design A quality improvement project was undertaken after a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle was developed and pilot‐tested. Methods Short, conversational interviews with nurse explored their views of a patient‐centred pressure ulcer care bundle. Interviews were audio‐taped and transcribed. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse the transcripts. Results A total of 20 nurses were interviewed. Five categories with corresponding subcategories emerged from the analysis. They were increasing awareness of pressure ulcer prevention, prompting pressure ulcer prevention activities, promoting active patient participation, barriers to using a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle and enabling integration of the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle into routine practice. Conclusions Benefits of using a patient‐centred pressure ulcer prevention care bundle may include prompting patients and staff to implement prevention strategies and promote active patient participation in care. The success of the care bundle relied on both patients' willingness to participate and nurses' willingness to incorporate it into their routine work. Relevance to Clinical Practice A patient‐centred pressure ulcer prevention care bundle may facilitate more consistent implementation of pressure ulcer prevention strategies and active patient participation in care.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Chaboyer & Brigid M. Gillespie, 2014. "Understanding nurses' views on a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a first step towards successful implementation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3415-3423, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3415-3423
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12587
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen Li & Xinmei Zhou & Jing Cao & Zheng Li & Xia Wan & Jiaqian Li & Jing Jiao & Ge Liu & Ying Liu & Fangfang Li & Baoyun Song & Jingfen Jin & Yilan Liu & Xianxiu Wen & Shouzhen Cheng & Xinjuan Wu, 2018. "Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications among bedridden patients: A prospective multicentre study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1969-1980, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:23-24:p:3415-3423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.