IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v21y2012i3-4p380-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pressure ulcers in older hospitalised patients and its impact on length of stay: a retrospective observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Silke Theisen
  • Anna Drabik
  • Stephanie Stock

Abstract

Objective. To examine the effect of pressure ulcers in older patients on the length of stay in hospital. Background. Previous research on this topic did not focus solely on older people. A growing number of older people require hospital admission. Design. A retrospective observational study. Methods. Data of 3198 patients age 75 years and older were included. The setting was a 1350‐bed German University Hospital. Data were drawn from quality indicator data recorded by nurses. The independent effect of pressure ulcers was analysed using a multivariate Poisson–Regression model. Results. Of the participants, 7·1% had an ulcer during their hospitalisation. 87·3% were classified as categories I and II. Mean age was 81·6 years for all patients and 83·2 years for pressure ulcer patients. Pressure ulcer patients had a longer overall hospital stay (19·0 vs. 9·9 days) and a higher excess length of stay (2·6 vs. 0·3 days). Pressure ulcers had a statistically significant effect (p = 0·0011) on the increase in length of stay. The impact of hospital acquired pressure ulcers on length of stay was more pronounced compared to those ulcers being present on admission. The pressure ulcer category was not significant. Conclusions. Pressure ulcers during hospitalisation are an independent and significant predictor of a prolonged inpatient stay for elderly patients. This study indicates that besides complications and co‐morbidities social factors, as well as the hospital’s internal processes of patient care, also can play a significant role. Relevance to clinical practice. To evaluate the distinct role of hospital acquired pressure ulcers further research is needed. The elderly patients in this study were a heterogeneous group. The implementation of clinical and nursing processes for both the ‘fit’ and the ‘sick’ geriatric patients is an important challenge.

Suggested Citation

  • Silke Theisen & Anna Drabik & Stephanie Stock, 2012. "Pressure ulcers in older hospitalised patients and its impact on length of stay: a retrospective observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3‐4), pages 380-387, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:380-387
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03915.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03915.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03915.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorothy Li Bai & Tsai-Wen Liu & Hsiu-Ling Chou & Yeh-Liang Hsu, 2020. "Relationship between a pressure redistributing foam mattress and pressure injuries: An observational prospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Zhen Li & Xinmei Zhou & Jing Cao & Zheng Li & Xia Wan & Jiaqian Li & Jing Jiao & Ge Liu & Ying Liu & Fangfang Li & Baoyun Song & Jingfen Jin & Yilan Liu & Xianxiu Wen & Shouzhen Cheng & Xinjuan Wu, 2018. "Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications among bedridden patients: A prospective multicentre study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1969-1980, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:21:y:2012:i:3-4:p:380-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.