IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2pe203-e212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' knowledge on diabetic foot ulcer disease and their attitudes towards patients affected: A cross‐sectional institution‐based study

Author

Listed:
  • Sriyani A. Kumarasinghe
  • Priyadarshika Hettiarachchi
  • Sudharshani Wasalathanthri

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess nurses' knowledge on diabetic ulcer disease and their attitudes towards patients suffering from it and to identify factors which influence them. Background Diabetic wound care is an evolving specialty with the rising prevalence of diabetes foot complications. As nurses play a key role in wound care, their knowledge and attitudes are important in providing optimum care to patients. Design Descriptive cross‐sectional survey design. Methods The study was conducted in three teaching hospitals. Data were collected using a pretested, validated, self‐administered questionnaire from purposively recruited, voluntarily participating nurses (n = 200) who were in diabetic wound care practice for ≥1 year. Results Lack of formal wound care training was reported by 91.2%. Mean knowledge score was 77.9 (range 53.3–100 on a scale from 0–100) with 57.8% of nurses obtaining ≥80%. Nurses demonstrated an overall positive attitude towards caring for diabetic ulcer patients (median = 41, range 23–50 on a scale from 10–50). However, the study identified deficits in core knowledge and some negative attitudes such as insensitivity to pain. Statistically significant associations were seen between nurses' knowledge and duration of nursing, wound care experience and the type of unit they are attached to. In‐service education (77.2%) and knowledge sharing with peers (77.9%) were the most popular knowledge‐updating sources. Although 98.6% of nurses were interested in wound care, only 8.3% wished to engage in research. No correlation was observed between nurses' knowledge and attitudes. Conclusion Gaps in core knowledge and negative attitudes may be attributed to inadequate training, suboptimal update of knowledge and lack of interest in wound care research. Relevance to clinical practice Wound care training should be made mandatory to improve quality of care given by nurses to patients with diabetic ulcers. Continuous professional development, evidence‐based practices and wound care research should be encouraged.

Suggested Citation

  • Sriyani A. Kumarasinghe & Priyadarshika Hettiarachchi & Sudharshani Wasalathanthri, 2018. "Nurses' knowledge on diabetic foot ulcer disease and their attitudes towards patients affected: A cross‐sectional institution‐based study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 203-212, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e203-e212
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13917
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liesbet Demarré & Katrien Vanderwee & Tom Defloor & Sofie Verhaeghe & Lisette Schoonhoven & Dimitri Beeckman, 2012. "Pressure ulcers: knowledge and attitude of nurses and nursing assistants in Belgian nursing homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1425-1434, May.
    2. Brigid M Gillespie & Wendy Chaboyer & Pamela Allen & Nicola Morely & Paul Nieuwenhoven, 2014. "Wound care practices: a survey of acute care nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2618-2627, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharon Latimer & Wendy Chaboyer & Lukman Thalib & Elizabeth McInnes & Tracey Bucknall & Brigid M. Gillespie, 2019. "Pressure injury prevalence and predictors among older adults in the first 36 hours of hospitalisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 4119-4127, November.
    2. Zhen Li & Xinmei Zhou & Jing Cao & Zheng Li & Xia Wan & Jiaqian Li & Jing Jiao & Ge Liu & Ying Liu & Fangfang Li & Baoyun Song & Jingfen Jin & Yilan Liu & Xianxiu Wen & Shouzhen Cheng & Xinjuan Wu, 2018. "Nurses’ knowledge and attitudes regarding major immobility complications among bedridden patients: A prospective multicentre study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1969-1980, May.
    3. Ami Hommel & Lena Gunningberg & Ewa Idvall & Carina Bååth, 2017. "Successful factors to prevent pressure ulcers – an interview study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 182-189, January.
    4. Frances Lin & Brigid M. Gillespie & Wendy Chaboyer & Yu Li & Karen Whitelock & Nicola Morley & Shirley Morrissey & Frances O’Callaghan & Andrea P. Marshall, 2019. "Preventing surgical site infections: Facilitators and barriers to nurses’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1643-1652, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e203-e212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.