IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v24y2015i1-2p69-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexities of medicines safety: communicating about managing medicines at transition points of care across emergency departments and medical wards

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Manias
  • Marie Gerdtz
  • Allison Williams
  • Michael Dooley

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how health professionals, patients and family members communicate about managing medicines across transition points of care in two Australian public hospitals. Background Medicines errors are common at transition points of care. Little qualitative work has targeted communicating about medicines management across patients' journeys from admission through to discharge. Design A qualitative descriptive study was undertaken. Methods In‐depth, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with patients and family members, and focus groups and interviews were undertaken with doctors, nurses and pharmacists (n = 103). These individuals were situated in emergency departments and general medical wards. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Four themes were identified: contextual environment of care, competing responsibilities of care, awareness of responsibility for safety, and interprofessional communication. Contextual environment of care was affected by time pressure and efficiency, and an overriding priority to move patients out of emergency departments. In competing responsibilities of care, a reactive focus was displayed in emergency departments while a proactive stance was demonstrated in medical wards. There was an awareness of responsibility for safety, whereby key stakeholders appreciated the chain of events involved, interpersonal communication affected patients and carers, and consequences existed for patient education related to lack of information. Interdisciplinary communication was associated with communication modalities used in encounters, compartmentalised thinking, and medicines changes relayed to external providers. Conclusions Medicines management at transition points involved a complex interplay of dynamic features. This interplay infiltrated across diverse environments, affecting patient care within and outside hospitals. Relevance to clinical practice Health professionals require greater appreciation of each other's roles at transition points of care. Prioritisation of high‐risk patients is needed, such as those with cognitive impairment and multiple co‐morbidities. Establishing workable protocols of communication etiquette and a structured approach to medicines activities may assist in pre‐empting problems before they occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Manias & Marie Gerdtz & Allison Williams & Michael Dooley, 2015. "Complexities of medicines safety: communicating about managing medicines at transition points of care across emergency departments and medical wards," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 69-80, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:69-80
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12685
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgia Tobiano & Christine Ting & Christine Ryan & Kim Jenkinson & Lucie Scott & Andrea P. Marshall, 2020. "Front‐line nurses' perceptions of intra‐hospital handover," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2231-2238, July.
    2. Line Melby & Berit J Brattheim & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2015. "Patients in transition – improving hospital–home care collaboration through electronic messaging: providers’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3389-3399, December.
    3. Signe Foged & Vibeke Nørholm & Ove Andersen & Helle Vendel Petersen, 2018. "Nurses’ perspectives on how an e‐message system supports cross‐sectoral communication in relation to medication administration: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 795-806, February.
    4. Elizabeth Manias & Tracey Bucknall & Robyn Woodward-Kron & Carmel Hughes & Christine Jorm & Guncag Ozavci & Kathryn Joseph, 2021. "Interprofessional and Intraprofessional Communication about Older People’s Medications across Transitions of Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-16, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:24:y:2015:i:1-2:p:69-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.