IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i13-14p1785-1795.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse‐sensitive indicators suitable to reflect nursing care quality: a review and discussion of issues

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Burston
  • Wendy Chaboyer
  • Brigid Gillespie

Abstract

Aims and objectives To review nurse‐sensitive indicators that may be suitable to assess nursing care quality. Background Patient safety concerns, fiscal pressures and patient expectation create a demand that healthcare providers demonstrate the quality of nursing care delivered. As a result, nurse managers are increasingly encouraged to provide evidence of nursing care quality. Nurse‐sensitive indicators are being proposed as a means of meeting this need. Design Literature review. Methods A review of the literature was conducted using CINAHL and MEDLINE from 2002–2011. Key search terms were nurs* and sensitive indicators, outcome measures, indicators, metrics and patient outcomes. Results Most of the research has examined the relationship between nursing structural variables and patient outcomes in acute care settings and have explored potential indicators for specific patient groups and nursing roles. When using nurse‐sensitive indicators, issues concerning the selection, reporting and sustained use are important for nurse managers to consider. Conclusion Evidence for the nurse‐sensitivity of some commonly used indicators is inconsistent due to the disparity in definitions used, data collection and analysis methods. Further research on the application and implementation of these indicators is required to assist nurse managers in attempting to quantify the quality of nursing care. Nurses need to continue to strive to achieve agreement on the definitions of indicators, gather strong consistent evidence of nurse‐sensitivity, resolve issues of regular data collection and consider selection, reporting and sustainment when implementing nurse‐sensitive indicators. Relevance to clinical practice Once identified, nurse‐sensitive indicators can be applied for quality improvement purposes, but consensus is required to fully realise their potential. Nurse managers need to be aware of the factors that can influence the use of indicators at unit level. Strategies need to be implemented to promote these indicators becoming integrated with routine nursing care.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Burston & Wendy Chaboyer & Brigid Gillespie, 2014. "Nurse‐sensitive indicators suitable to reflect nursing care quality: a review and discussion of issues," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 1785-1795, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:13-14:p:1785-1795
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Chen & Li‐Hua Huang & Mei‐Yuan Xing & Zhi‐Xian Feng & Le‐Wen Shao & Mei‐Yun Zhang & Rong‐Ya Shao, 2017. "Using the Delphi method to develop nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for the NICU," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 502-513, February.
    2. Kieft, R.A.M.M. & Stalpers, D. & Jansen, A.P.M. & Francke, A.L. & Delnoij, D.M.J., 2018. "The methodological quality of nurse-sensitive indicators in Dutch hospitals: A descriptive exploratory research study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(7), pages 755-764.
    3. Scott Domingue & Skip Morelock & Judith Walsh & Patricia Newcomb & Christine Russe & Alexander Nava & Ashley Jones & Jessy R. John, 2018. "Beyond fall risk assessment: A case–control study in an Urban Medical Center," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3894-3899, November.
    4. Laurie Grealish & Wendy Chaboyer & Jacob Darch & Belinda Real & Maggie Phelan & Dawn Soltau & Matthew Lunn & Susan Brandis & Jo‐anne Todd & Marie Cooke, 2019. "Caring for the older person with cognitive impairment in hospital: Qualitative analysis of nursing personnel reflections on fall events," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1346-1353, April.
    5. Ju‐Lin Gao & Xiao‐Min Liu & Wen‐Fang Che & Xia Xin, 2018. "Construction of nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis using Delphi method," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 3920-3930, November.
    6. Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Rebecca Feo & Hester Vermeulen & Maud Heinen, 2018. "Students’ perspectives on basic nursing care education," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2450-2459, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:13-14:p:1785-1795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.